luckadjusted
CFB Week 4 · 2026

Week 2 2025 · September 6, 2025

Stanford at BYU, Week 2 2025: who deserved to win?

BYU beat Stanford 27–3, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, BYU wins 10 of 10.

Before kickoff BYU was a 91% favorite.

Final

Stanford Cardinal 3
BYU Cougars 27

September 6, 2025 · LaVell Edwards Stadium · Closing line: BYU −20.5

Luck index +3 BYU about even · −3 Stanford

Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works

Ten replays. Stanford wins 0, BYU wins 10.

  1. 1 STAN 6 BYU 10
  2. 2 STAN 7 BYU 16
  3. 3 STAN 14 BYU 27
  4. 4 STAN 0 BYU 16
  5. 5 STAN 6 BYU 24
  6. 6 STAN 10 BYU 31
  7. 7 STAN 0 BYU 24
  8. 8 STAN 10 BYU 37
  9. 9 STAN 0 BYU 31
  10. 10 STAN 0 BYU 37

Three other ways to ask

Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.

The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.

The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.

Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.

How 4,000 replays ended

Stanford wins 3% of them, BYU 97%. The line is what actually happened: BYU by 24.

Show as a table
Final margin in the replaysShare of replays
Stanford by 17+0.1%
Stanford by 9–160.7%
Stanford by 1–82.1%
Level after regulation0.2%
BYU by 1–811.6%
BYU by 9–1615.7%
BYU by 17+69.6%

Where the luck was

What the luck was worth

Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.

Swings add up across a game, so in one that went back and forth they can pass 100%. On the scoreboard the same luck was worth +3.6 points to BYU: the final margin was BYU by 24, without the luck BYU by 20.4. Luck shares are the fitted ones (how much of each kind is luck).

The kicks

How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.

  • W. Ferrin, 36 yds made · 84% expected
  • W. Ferrin, 30 yds made · 92% expected
  • W. Ferrin, 21 yds made · 99% expected
  • E. Kenney, 26 yds made · 92% expected
  • W. Ferrin, 23 yds made · 98% expected
Bar: expected chance of a make. Filled dot: made. Open dot: missed or blocked.

Penalties: Stanford 6 for 45 yards, BYU 4 for 35 yards

Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued

WhenFlagWin probability for
Q2 13:32 False Start on Stanford, 5 yards · pre-snap +1% BYU +1.3 pts
Q2 13:18 False Start on Stanford, 5 yards · pre-snap 0% BYU +0.7 pts
Q2 12:30 Holding on BYU, 10 yards 0% STAN +0.6 pts
Q2 6:30 Illegal Block on BYU, 10 yards 0% STAN +1.3 pts
Q2 3:54 Holding on BYU, 10 yards 0% STAN +0.6 pts
Q3 14:38 Holding on Stanford, 10 yards 0% BYU +1.3 pts
Q3 14:10 Personal Foul on Stanford, 15 yards 0% BYU +1.6 pts
Q3 12:36 Illegal Procedure on Stanford, 5 yards · pre-snap 0% BYU +0.9 pts
Q4 7:04 False Start on BYU, 5 yards · pre-snap 0% STAN +0.3 pts
Q4 3:12 Delay of Game on Stanford, 5 yards · pre-snap 0% BYU +0.5 pts

When it happened

BYU’s chance of winning

Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.

Our in-game win probability: the score, the value of the possession and the time left, starting from the betting line. Overtime has no clock and is drawn at a fixed width. Shaded above the middle while BYU was ahead in it, below while Stanford was.
#WhenWhat happenedWin probability forNext drive
1 Q1 13:37 Stanford was stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 37% expected +1% BYU STAN: Punt
2 Q1 12:27 BYU converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 50% expected +1% BYU BYU: Turnover on downs
3 Q1 10:59 BYU was stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 45% expected +1% STAN BYU: Turnover on downs
4 Q1 10:15 BYU converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 79% expected +1% BYU BYU: Turnover on downs
5 Q1 8:45 BYU was stopped on 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 32% expected +1% STAN BYU: Turnover on downs
6 Q1 8:13 BYU was stopped on 4th & 63rd & 4th downs · 40% expected +2% STAN BYU: Touchdown
7 Q1 6:49 Stanford was stopped on 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 29% expected +1% BYU STAN: Punt
8 Q2 1:26 Stanford fumbled and recovered itFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 +1% STAN STAN: Punt

Adjust the assumptions

Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.

Only coin-flips re-rolled

Stanford 0% · BYU 100%

Final margin
BYU by 24
Luck in points
3.6 for BYU
Luck-adjusted margin
BYU by 20.4
Replay with same day's form
Stanford 3% · BYU 97% unchanged: why
How much of each is luck?

0% treats it as skill, 100% as pure luck. The tick is our fit.

What counts

None by default: our tests measured no carryover after a lucky break. Slide it up to count a break for more than its own swing. Why

Flip a play

Force the other outcome, in this game and in every replay: a made kick becomes a miss, a stop becomes a conversion, a flag goes the other way.

About these numbers

Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.

Methodology and validation · All Week 2 2025 games · Stanford · BYU

More from Week 2 2025

Every week 2 game, 2025