Week 4 2025 · September 20, 2025
North Carolina at UCF, Week 4 2025: who deserved to win?
UCF beat North Carolina 34–9, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, UCF wins 9 of 10. North Carolina had the bounces: pre-snap flags alone were worth 9 points of win probability to North Carolina.
Before kickoff UCF was a 68% favorite.
Final
| 9 | |
| 34 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +9 UCF about even · −9 North Carolina
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. North Carolina wins 1, UCF wins 9.
- 1 UNC 31 UCF 24
- 2 UNC 17 UCF 20
- 3 UNC 20 UCF 27
- 4 UNC 10 UCF 20
- 5 UNC 7 UCF 20
- 6 UNC 10 UCF 27
- 7 UNC 10 UCF 30
- 8 UNC 10 UCF 33
- 9 UNC 0 UCF 28
- 10 UNC 0 UCF 34
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
North Carolina wins 9% of them, UCF 91%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: UCF by 25.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| North Carolina by 17+ | 0.8% |
| North Carolina by 9–16 | 2.3% |
| North Carolina by 1–8 | 5.5% |
| Level after regulation | 1.8% |
| UCF by 1–8 | 19.7% |
| UCF by 9–16 | 20.0% |
| UCF by 17+ | 50.0% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- N. Ruelas, 36 yds made · 79% expected
- N. Ruelas, 41 yds made · 71% expected
- R. Verhoff, 40 yds made · 73% expected
Penalties: North Carolina 6 for 52 yards, UCF 7 for 40 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 13:14 | False Start on UCF, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UNC +0.8 pts |
| Q1 6:51 | Offside on UCF, 5 yards, wiping out the play · pre-snap | +6% UNC +4.0 pts |
| Q2 11:25 | False Start on UCF, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% UNC +0.4 pts |
| Q2 10:09 | Illegal Formation on UCF, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UNC +0.6 pts |
| Q2 5:27 | Penalty on North Carolina, 2 yards | 0% UCF 0.0 pts |
| Q2 2:00 | False Start on North Carolina, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UCF +0.4 pts |
| Q2 1:06 | Illegal Formation on UCF, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UNC +0.6 pts |
| Q2 0:57 | Holding on North Carolina, 10 yards | +1% UCF +0.8 pts |
| Q2 0:37 | Roughing the Passer on North Carolina, 15 yards | +1% UCF +0.5 pts |
| Q4 14:56 | Offside on UCF, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UNC +1.4 pts |
| Q4 12:38 | Holding on North Carolina, 10 yards | +1% UCF +1.5 pts |
| Q4 9:41 | Holding on UCF, 10 yards | 0% UNC +1.7 pts |
| Q4 1:46 | Holding on North Carolina, 10 yards | 0% UCF +0.2 pts |
When it happened
UCF’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 14:17 | UCF converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 45% expected | +3% UCF | UCF: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q1 11:39 | UCF converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 79% expected | +2% UCF | UCF: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q1 9:53 | UCF converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 38% expected | +3% UCF | UCF: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q1 8:23 | UCF converted 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 67% expected | +2% UCF | UCF: Field goal |
| 5 | Q1 6:51 | Offside on UCF, 5 yards, wiping out the playPre-snap flags | +6% UNC | UNC: Turnover |
| 6 | Q1 6:43 | North Carolina converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 41% expected | +3% UNC | UNC: Turnover |
| 7 | Q1 5:22 | UCF was stopped on 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 35% expected | +2% UNC | UCF: Field goal |
| 8 | Q1 3:36 | North Carolina was stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 53% expected | +2% UCF | UNC: Punt |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
North Carolina 0% · UCF 100%
- Final margin
- UCF by 25
- Luck in points
- 4.9 for North Carolina
- Luck-adjusted margin
- UCF by 29.9
- Replay with same day's form
- North Carolina 9% · UCF 91% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 4 2025 games ·
North Carolina ·
UCF
More from Week 4 2025
- Syracuse at Clemson SYR 34–21 · replay 34% for the winner
- NC State at Duke DUKE 45–33 · replay 35% for the winner
- Arizona State at Baylor ASU 27–24 · replay 39% for the winner
- Tulsa at Oklahoma State TLSA 19–12 · replay 44% for the winner
- BYU at East Carolina BYU 34–13 · replay 66% for the winner
- SMU at TCU TCU 35–24 · replay 74% for the winner
- Texas Tech at Utah TTU 34–10 · replay 87% for the winner
- Wyoming at Colorado COLO 37–20 · replay 91% for the winner
- California at San Diego State SDSU 34–0 · replay 92% for the winner
- Florida at Miami MIA 26–7 · replay 98% for the winner
- Bowling Green at Louisville LOU 40–17 · replay 99% for the winner
- Stanford at Virginia UVA 48–20 · replay 99% for the winner