Week 4 2025 · September 18, 2025
Part of this game's play-by-play is missing from the source: the plays on file account for 38 of the 45 points, so the replay rests on the plays there are.
Rice at Charlotte, Week 4 2025: who deserved to win?
Rice beat Charlotte 28–17, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Rice wins 9 of 10.
Before kickoff Rice was a 54% favorite.
Final
| 28 | |
| 17 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +13 Rice about even · −13 Charlotte
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Rice wins 9, Charlotte wins 1.
- 1 RICE 45 CLT 7
- 2 RICE 41 CLT 10
- 3 RICE 26 CLT 0
- 4 RICE 35 CLT 14
- 5 RICE 17 CLT 0
- 6 RICE 38 CLT 24
- 7 RICE 24 CLT 14
- 8 RICE 24 CLT 17
- 9 RICE 17 CLT 14
- 10 RICE 13 CLT 20
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Rice wins 87% of them, Charlotte 13%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Rice by 11.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Rice by 17+ | 46.3% |
| Rice by 9–16 | 19.4% |
| Rice by 1–8 | 20.7% |
| Level after regulation | 1.4% |
| Charlotte by 1–8 | 8.1% |
| Charlotte by 9–16 | 3.0% |
| Charlotte by 17+ | 1.1% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- L. Boyd, 29 yds made · 87% expected
- L. Boyd, 25 yds made · 91% expected
- L. Boyd, 40 yds made · 72% expected
- L. Boyd, 42 yds missed · 69% expected
- E. Gota, 55 yds missed · 44% expected
Penalties: Rice 7 for 82 yards, Charlotte 5 for 43 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 12:06 | Holding on Rice, 10 yards | +4% CLT +1.8 pts |
| Q1 12:00 | Pass Interference on Rice, 12 yards | +1% CLT +0.7 pts |
| Q1 10:15 | Holding on Charlotte, 10 yards | +2% RICE +1.2 pts |
| Q1 0:58 | Personal Foul on Rice, 15 yards | +2% CLT +1.1 pts |
| Q2 9:13 | Pass Interference on Rice, 15 yards | +2% CLT +1.0 pts |
| Q3 10:53 | Pass Interference on Charlotte, 13 yards | +3% RICE +1.8 pts |
| Q3 8:28 | Holding on Rice, 10 yards | +1% CLT +1.2 pts |
| Q3 6:49 | False Start on Charlotte, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% RICE +0.7 pts |
| Q3 3:19 | False Start on Rice, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% CLT +1.4 pts |
| Q4 7:40 | Pass Interference on Rice, 15 yards | 0% CLT +2.5 pts |
| Q4 1:46 | Holding on Charlotte, 10 yards | 0% RICE +0.6 pts |
| Q4 1:37 | False Start on Charlotte, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% RICE +0.3 pts |
When it happened
Charlotte’s chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 56%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 12:06 | Holding on Rice, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +4% CLT | CLT: Field goal |
| 2 | Q1 10:55 | Charlotte converted 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 25% expected | +5% CLT | CLT: Field goal |
| 3 | Q1 3:11 | Charlotte was stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 53% expected | +4% RICE | CLT: Punt |
| 4 | Q2 11:42 | Charlotte converted 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 29% expected | +6% CLT | CLT: Field goal |
| 5 | Q2 9:50 | Charlotte fumbled and recovered itFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +4% CLT | CLT: Field goal |
| 6 | Q2 9:42 | Charlotte converted 3rd & 183rd & 4th downs · 18% expected | +7% CLT | CLT: Field goal |
| 7 | Q3 12:23 | Rice converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 44% expected | +5% RICE | RICE: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q3 0:15 | Charlotte converted 4th & 73rd & 4th downs · 33% expected | +8% CLT | CLT: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Rice 100% · Charlotte 0%
- Final margin
- Rice by 11
- Luck in points
- 9.8 for Charlotte
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Rice by 20.8
- Replay with same day's form
- Rice 87% · Charlotte 13% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here. Part of this game's play-by-play is missing from the source: the plays on file account for 38 of the 45 points, so the replay rests on the plays there are.
Methodology and validation · All Week 4 2025 games ·
Rice ·
Charlotte
More from Week 4 2025
- Arkansas at Memphis MEM 32–31 · replay 30% for the winner
- UTSA at Colorado State UTSA 17–16 · replay 40% for the winner
- Tulsa at Oklahoma State TLSA 19–12 · replay 44% for the winner
- North Texas at Army UNT 45–38 · replay 50% for the winner
- BYU at East Carolina BYU 34–13 · replay 66% for the winner
- Tulane at Ole Miss MISS 45–10 · replay 98% for the winner
- South Carolina State at South Florida USF 63–14 · replay 100% for the winner
- Temple at Georgia Tech GT 45–24 · replay 100% for the winner
- UAB at Tennessee TENN 56–24 · replay 100% for the winner
- Fresno State at Hawai'i FRES 23–21 · replay 24% for the winner
- Troy at Buffalo TROY 21–17 · replay 30% for the winner
- Syracuse at Clemson SYR 34–21 · replay 34% for the winner