Week 5 2025 · September 27, 2025
Lindenwood at Miami (OH), Week 5 2025: who deserved to win?
Miami (OH) beat Lindenwood 38–0, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Miami (OH) wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Miami (OH) was a 93% favorite.
Final
| 0 | |
| 38 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index 0 Miami (OH) about even · 0 Lindenwood
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Lindenwood wins 0, Miami (OH) wins 10.
- 1 LIN 13 M-OH 23
- 2 LIN 14 M-OH 31
- 3 LIN 10 M-OH 31
- 4 LIN 12 M-OH 38
- 5 LIN 0 M-OH 31
- 6 LIN 16 M-OH 49
- 7 LIN 3 M-OH 39
- 8 LIN 6 M-OH 45
- 9 LIN 10 M-OH 55
- 10 LIN 0 M-OH 52
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Lindenwood wins 0% of them, Miami (OH) 100%. The line is what actually happened: Miami (OH) by 38.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Lindenwood by 17+ | 0.0% |
| Lindenwood by 9–16 | 0.0% |
| Lindenwood by 1–8 | 0.3% |
| Level after regulation | 0.1% |
| Miami (OH) by 1–8 | 1.3% |
| Miami (OH) by 9–16 | 3.5% |
| Miami (OH) by 17+ | 94.8% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- D. Dzioban, 33 yds made · 86% expected
- D. Dzioban, 25 yds missed · 94% expected
Penalties: Lindenwood 2 for 23 yards, Miami (OH) 6 for 50 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 11:28 | False Start on Miami (OH), 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% LIN +0.4 pts |
| Q1 6:28 | Offside on Miami (OH), 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% LIN +0.9 pts |
| Q1 0:49 | Pass Interference on Miami (OH), 15 yards | +1% LIN +1.6 pts |
| Q2 0:33 | False Start on Miami (OH), 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% LIN +0.4 pts |
| Q3 12:19 | Holding on Lindenwood, 10 yards | 0% M-OH +1.1 pts |
| Q3 6:35 | Personal Foul on Miami (OH), 15 yards | 0% LIN +3.0 pts |
| Q3 3:45 | Delay of Game on Miami (OH), 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% LIN +1.1 pts |
| Q3 2:12 | Intentional Grounding on Lindenwood, 13 yards | 0% M-OH +2.9 pts |
When it happened
Miami (OH)’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 11:41 | Miami (OH) was stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 57% expected | +1% LIN | M-OH: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 9:42 | Miami (OH) was stopped on 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 72% expected | +1% LIN | M-OH: Punt |
| 3 | Q1 8:26 | Lindenwood was stopped on 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 33% expected | +1% M-OH | LIN: Punt |
| 4 | Q1 8:21 | Return touchdown by Miami (OH)Special teams | +2% M-OH | M-OH: Punt |
| 5 | Q1 5:30 | Lindenwood was stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 54% expected | +1% M-OH | LIN: Punt |
| 6 | Q1 2:59 | Miami (OH) was stopped on 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 78% expected | +1% LIN | M-OH: Punt |
| 7 | Q1 0:49 | Pass Interference on Miami (OH), 15 yardsJudgment calls | +1% LIN | LIN: Punt |
| 8 | Q1 0:15 | Lindenwood was stopped on 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 32% expected | +1% M-OH | LIN: Punt |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Lindenwood 0% · Miami (OH) 100%
- Final margin
- Miami (OH) by 38
- Luck in points
- 3.9 for Lindenwood
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Miami (OH) by 41.9
- Replay with same day's form
- Lindenwood 0% · Miami (OH) 100% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 5 2025 games ·
Lindenwood ·
Miami (OH)
More from Week 5 2025
- Bowling Green at Ohio OHIO 35–20 · replay 62% for the winner
- UConn at Buffalo CONN 20–17 · replay 71% for the winner
- San Diego State at Northern Illinois SDSU 6–3 · replay 82% for the winner
- Rhode Island at Western Michigan WMU 47–14 · replay 88% for the winner
- Eastern Michigan at Central Michigan CMU 24–13 · replay 90% for the winner
- Akron at Toledo TOL 45–3 · replay 100% for the winner
- Massachusetts at Missouri MIZ 42–6 · replay 100% for the winner
- Hawai'i at Air Force HAW 44–35 · replay 5% for the winner
- Louisville at Pittsburgh LOU 34–27 · replay 11% for the winner
- California at Boston College CAL 28–24 · replay 28% for the winner
- Marshall at Louisiana UL 54–51 · replay 29% for the winner
- Cincinnati at Kansas CIN 37–34 · replay 30% for the winner