Week 5 2025 · September 27, 2025
UCLA at Northwestern, Week 5 2025: who deserved to win?
Northwestern beat UCLA 17–14, and the replays lean its way: with the same day's form, it wins 7 of 10. UCLA had the bounces: fumble bounces alone were worth 15 points of win probability to UCLA.
Before kickoff Northwestern was a 65% favorite. The biggest swing (Q4, 1:29 left): UCLA fumbled and recovered it, worth 14 points of win probability to UCLA.
Final
| 14 | |
| 17 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +34 Northwestern lucky · −34 UCLA
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. UCLA wins 3, Northwestern wins 7.
- 1 UCLA 28 NU 12
- 2 UCLA 21 NU 13
- 3 UCLA 17 NU 14
- 4 UCLA 17 NU 19
- 5 UCLA 14 NU 18
- 6 UCLA 7 NU 14
- 7 UCLA 7 NU 17
- 8 UCLA 14 NU 27
- 9 UCLA 0 NU 17
- 10 UCLA 14 NU 39
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
UCLA wins 34% of them, Northwestern 66%, counting the 3% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Northwestern by 3.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| UCLA by 17+ | 4.9% |
| UCLA by 9–16 | 9.3% |
| UCLA by 1–8 | 19.0% |
| Level after regulation | 2.6% |
| Northwestern by 1–8 | 27.3% |
| Northwestern by 9–16 | 20.4% |
| Northwestern by 17+ | 16.4% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- J. Olsen, 33 yds made · 82% expected
- M. Bhaghani, 28 yds made · 92% expected
- M. Bhaghani, 25 yds made · 94% expected
- J. Olsen, 20 yds missed · 94% expected
Penalties: UCLA 4 for 25 yards, Northwestern 5 for 55 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 14:26 | False Start on UCLA, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% NU +0.8 pts |
| Q1 10:12 | False Start on Northwestern, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UCLA +0.8 pts |
| Q2 8:53 | Illegal Formation on Northwestern, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% UCLA +0.3 pts |
| Q2 6:18 | Illegal Formation on UCLA, 0 yards · pre-snap | 0% NU 0.0 pts |
| Q3 10:39 | Personal Foul on Northwestern, 15 yards | +2% UCLA +1.6 pts |
| Q3 2:48 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on UCLA, 15 yards | 0% NU +0.9 pts |
| Q4 14:12 | Pass Interference on Northwestern, 15 yards | +3% UCLA +1.6 pts |
| Q4 6:42 | Personal Foul on Northwestern, 15 yards | +3% UCLA +0.9 pts |
| Q4 1:29 | False Start on UCLA, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% NU +0.1 pts |
When it happened
Northwestern’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 13:34 | UCLA converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 34% expected | +4% UCLA | UCLA: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 4:44 | Northwestern converted 4th & 43rd & 4th downs · 51% expected | +5% NU | NU: Field goal |
| 3 | Q4 7:50 | J. Olsen missed a 20-yard field goalKicks · 94% expected for him | +6% UCLA | NU: Punt |
| 4 | Q4 6:19 | UCLA’s two-point try was good3rd & 4th downs · 46% expected | +5% UCLA | UCLA: Punt |
| 5 | Q4 5:34 | Northwestern converted 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 67% expected | +5% NU | NU: Punt |
| 6 | Q4 3:27 | Northwestern was stopped on 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 52% expected | +6% UCLA | NU: Punt |
| 7 | Q4 1:43 | Northwestern was stopped on 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 51% expected | +5% UCLA | NU: Punt |
| 8 | Q4 1:29 | UCLA was stopped on 3rd & 223rd & 4th downs · 15% expectedUCLA fumbled and recovered itFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50False Start on UCLA, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +14% UCLA | UCLA: End of game |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
UCLA 6% · Northwestern 94%
- Final margin
- Northwestern by 3
- Luck in points
- 5.8 for UCLA
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Northwestern by 8.8
- Replay with same day's form
- UCLA 34% · Northwestern 66% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 5 2025 games ·
UCLA ·
Northwestern
More from Week 5 2025
- Oregon at Penn State ORE 30–24 · replay 39% for the winner
- Rutgers at Minnesota MINN 31–28 · replay 41% for the winner
- Indiana at Iowa IU 20–15 · replay 48% for the winner
- USC at Illinois ILL 34–32 · replay 76% for the winner
- Ohio State at Washington OSU 24–6 · replay 79% for the winner
- Hawai'i at Air Force HAW 44–35 · replay 5% for the winner
- Louisville at Pittsburgh LOU 34–27 · replay 11% for the winner
- California at Boston College CAL 28–24 · replay 28% for the winner
- Marshall at Louisiana UL 54–51 · replay 29% for the winner
- Cincinnati at Kansas CIN 37–34 · replay 30% for the winner
- Houston at Oregon State HOU 27–24 · replay 34% for the winner
- Georgia Tech at Wake Forest GT 30–29 · replay 40% for the winner