Week 7 2025 · October 11, 2025
Clemson at Boston College, Week 7 2025: who deserved to win?
Clemson beat Boston College 41–10, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Clemson wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Clemson was an 82% favorite.
Final
| 41 | |
| 10 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +1 Clemson about even · −1 Boston College
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Clemson wins 10, Boston College wins 0.
- 1 CLEM 55 BC 10
- 2 CLEM 56 BC 17
- 3 CLEM 45 BC 10
- 4 CLEM 37 BC 6
- 5 CLEM 38 BC 10
- 6 CLEM 35 BC 10
- 7 CLEM 38 BC 17
- 8 CLEM 26 BC 7
- 9 CLEM 42 BC 28
- 10 CLEM 21 BC 13
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Clemson wins 99% of them, Boston College 1%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Clemson by 31.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Clemson by 17+ | 84.0% |
| Clemson by 9–16 | 10.1% |
| Clemson by 1–8 | 4.5% |
| Level after regulation | 0.6% |
| Boston College by 1–8 | 0.7% |
| Boston College by 9–16 | 0.1% |
| Boston College by 17+ | 0.1% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- N. Hauser, 46 yds made · 60% expected
- L. Lombardo, 45 yds made · 65% expected
Penalties: Clemson 2 for 18 yards, Boston College 3 for 25 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 3:02 | Pass Interference on Clemson, 12 yards | +1% BC +1.5 pts |
| Q2 9:19 | Roughing the Passer on Clemson, 6 yards | +1% BC +1.1 pts |
| Q2 9:09 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Boston College, 15 yards | 0% CLEM +0.9 pts |
| Q3 14:57 | Holding on Boston College, 10 yards | 0% CLEM +0.6 pts |
| Q4 3:48 | Offside on Boston College, 0 yards · pre-snap | 0% CLEM +0.7 pts |
When it happened
Boston College’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 11:52 | Clemson was stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 58% expected | +2% BC | CLEM: Field goal |
| 2 | Q1 11:08 | Clemson converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 79% expected | +1% CLEM | CLEM: Field goal |
| 3 | Q1 9:16 | Clemson was stopped on 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 79% expected | +3% BC | CLEM: Field goal |
| 4 | Q1 8:24 | N. Hauser made a 46-yard field goalKicks · 60% expected for him, 2 of 6 from 45+ before | +2% CLEM | CLEM: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q1 3:02 | Pass Interference on Clemson, 12 yardsJudgment calls | +1% BC | BC: Field goal |
| 6 | Q2 9:19 | Roughing the Passer on Clemson, 6 yardsJudgment calls | +1% BC | BC: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q2 6:32 | Clemson converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 35% expected | +2% CLEM | CLEM: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q2 2:38 | Boston College converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 47% expected | +1% BC | BC: Turnover |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Clemson 100% · Boston College 0%
- Final margin
- Clemson by 31
- Luck in points
- 6.9 for Clemson
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Clemson by 24.1
- Replay with same day's form
- Clemson 99% · Boston College 1% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 7 2025 games ·
Clemson ·
Boston College
More from Week 7 2025
- Pittsburgh at Florida State PITT 34–31 · replay 66% for the winner
- Virginia Tech at Georgia Tech GT 35–20 · replay 77% for the winner
- Stanford at SMU SMU 34–10 · replay 92% for the winner
- NC State at Notre Dame ND 36–7 · replay 96% for the winner
- Wake Forest at Oregon State WAKE 39–14 · replay 100% for the winner
- Navy at Temple NAVY 32–31 · replay 15% for the winner
- Northwestern at Penn State NU 22–21 · replay 19% for the winner
- Toledo at Bowling Green BGSU 28–23 · replay 21% for the winner
- Purdue at Minnesota MINN 27–20 · replay 25% for the winner
- Alabama at Missouri ALA 27–24 · replay 30% for the winner
- UL Monroe at Coastal Carolina CCU 23–8 · replay 31% for the winner
- TCU at Kansas State KSU 41–28 · replay 31% for the winner