Week 7 2025 · October 10, 2025
Rutgers at Washington, Week 7 2025: who deserved to win?
Washington beat Rutgers 38–19, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Washington wins 8 of 10.
Before kickoff Washington was a 73% favorite. The biggest swing (Q2, 11:54 left): Pass Interference on Washington, 15 yards, wiping out the play, worth 10 points of win probability to Rutgers.
Final
| 19 | |
| 38 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +17 Washington about even · −17 Rutgers
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Rutgers wins 2, Washington wins 8.
- 1 RUTG 48 WASH 31
- 2 RUTG 31 WASH 27
- 3 RUTG 38 WASH 41
- 4 RUTG 35 WASH 41
- 5 RUTG 35 WASH 45
- 6 RUTG 24 WASH 38
- 7 RUTG 13 WASH 31
- 8 RUTG 24 WASH 45
- 9 RUTG 21 WASH 49
- 10 RUTG 14 WASH 52
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Rutgers wins 17% of them, Washington 83%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Washington by 19.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Rutgers by 17+ | 2.6% |
| Rutgers by 9–16 | 5.1% |
| Rutgers by 1–8 | 8.8% |
| Level after regulation | 1.7% |
| Washington by 1–8 | 20.5% |
| Washington by 9–16 | 17.4% |
| Washington by 17+ | 44.0% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- G. Gross, 39 yds missed · 74% expected
- J. Patel, 35 yds made · 80% expected
- J. Patel, 45 yds missed · 63% expected
- J. Patel, 37 yds made · 77% expected
- G. Gross, 36 yds made · 78% expected
Penalties: Rutgers 4 for 31 yards, Washington 8 for 71 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 13:37 | Holding on Washington, 7 yards | +1% RUTG +0.4 pts |
| Q1 10:21 | Illegal Substitution on Washington, 5 yards · pre-snap | +4% RUTG +1.9 pts |
| Q1 5:43 | False Start on Rutgers, 5 yards · pre-snap | +6% WASH +0.4 pts |
| Q1 3:43 | Illegal Formation on Washington, 4 yards · pre-snap | +1% RUTG +0.2 pts |
| Q2 13:21 | Unnecessary Roughness on Washington, 15 yards | +4% WASH +1.8 pts |
| Q2 13:13 | Holding on Rutgers, 10 yards | +2% WASH +0.6 pts |
| Q2 11:54 | Pass Interference on Washington, 15 yards, wiping out the play | +10% RUTG +4.1 pts |
| Q2 2:00 | False Start on Rutgers, 1 yard · pre-snap | 0% WASH 0.0 pts |
| Q3 11:36 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Rutgers, 15 yards | +2% WASH +0.9 pts |
| Q3 9:29 | Pass Interference on Washington, 15 yards | +2% RUTG +1.3 pts |
| Q3 7:43 | False Start on Washington, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% RUTG +0.6 pts |
| Q4 5:53 | Offside on Washington, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% RUTG +0.8 pts |
When it happened
Washington’s chance of winning
As low as 39% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 10:53 | G. Gross missed a 39-yard field goalKicks · 74% expected for him | +5% RUTG | WASH: Field goal |
| 2 | Q1 5:43 | Rutgers was stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 43% expectedFalse Start on Rutgers, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +10% WASH | RUTG: Field goal |
| 3 | Q1 1:59 | J. Patel missed a 45-yard field goalKicks · 63% expected for him, 6 of 10 from 45+ before | +5% WASH | RUTG: Punt |
| 4 | Q2 11:54 | Pass Interference on Washington, 15 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +10% RUTG | RUTG: Turnover on downs |
| 5 | Q2 9:53 | Rutgers converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 32% expected | +5% RUTG | RUTG: Turnover on downs |
| 6 | Q2 6:49 | Rutgers was stopped on 4th & 33rd & 4th downs · 50% expected | +6% WASH | RUTG: Field goal |
| 7 | Q2 5:26 | Washington converted 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 34% expected | +6% WASH | WASH: Turnover |
| 8 | Q3 11:36 | Rutgers was stopped on 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 39% expectedUnsportsmanlike Conduct on Rutgers, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +5% WASH | RUTG: Punt |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Rutgers 0% · Washington 100%
- Final margin
- Washington by 19
- Luck in points
- 1.8 for Rutgers
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Washington by 20.8
- Replay with same day's form
- Rutgers 17% · Washington 83% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 7 2025 games ·
Rutgers ·
Washington
More from Week 7 2025
- Northwestern at Penn State NU 22–21 · replay 19% for the winner
- Purdue at Minnesota MINN 27–20 · replay 25% for the winner
- Indiana at Oregon IU 30–20 · replay 55% for the winner
- Ohio State at Illinois OSU 34–16 · replay 61% for the winner
- Michigan at USC USC 31–13 · replay 85% for the winner
- UCLA at Michigan State UCLA 38–13 · replay 96% for the winner
- Nebraska at Maryland NEB 34–31 · replay 96% for the winner
- Iowa at Wisconsin IOWA 37–0 · replay 100% for the winner
- Navy at Temple NAVY 32–31 · replay 15% for the winner
- Toledo at Bowling Green BGSU 28–23 · replay 21% for the winner
- Alabama at Missouri ALA 27–24 · replay 30% for the winner
- UL Monroe at Coastal Carolina CCU 23–8 · replay 31% for the winner