Week 9 2025 · October 25, 2025
Part of this game's play-by-play is missing from the source: the plays on file account for 47 of the 61 points, so the replay rests on the plays there are.
Baylor at Cincinnati, Week 9 2025: who deserved to win?
Cincinnati beat Baylor 41–20, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Cincinnati wins 9 of 10.
Before kickoff Cincinnati was a 59% favorite.
Final
| 20 | |
| 41 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +8 Cincinnati about even · −8 Baylor
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Baylor wins 1, Cincinnati wins 9.
- 1 BAY 27 CIN 21
- 2 BAY 21 CIN 24
- 3 BAY 17 CIN 24
- 4 BAY 14 CIN 24
- 5 BAY 21 CIN 34
- 6 BAY 0 CIN 16
- 7 BAY 3 CIN 21
- 8 BAY 17 CIN 38
- 9 BAY 10 CIN 35
- 10 BAY 7 CIN 42
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Baylor wins 8% of them, Cincinnati 92%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Cincinnati by 21.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Baylor by 17+ | 0.5% |
| Baylor by 9–16 | 1.8% |
| Baylor by 1–8 | 4.9% |
| Level after regulation | 1.5% |
| Cincinnati by 1–8 | 20.2% |
| Cincinnati by 9–16 | 20.7% |
| Cincinnati by 17+ | 50.3% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- S. Rusnak, 46 yds made · 63% expected
- S. Rusnak, 36 yds made · 81% expected
Penalties: Baylor 3 for 40 yards, Cincinnati 7 for 75 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 14:15 | Pass Interference on Baylor, 15 yards | +5% CIN +2.9 pts |
| Q2 14:14 | Delay of Game on Cincinnati, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% BAY +0.8 pts |
| Q2 11:43 | Holding on Baylor, 10 yards | +2% CIN +1.5 pts |
| Q3 7:51 | Pass Interference on Baylor, 15 yards | +1% CIN +1.4 pts |
| Q3 7:16 | Face Mask on Cincinnati, 15 yards | +1% BAY +1.0 pts |
| Q3 4:36 | Pass Interference on Cincinnati, 15 yards | +2% BAY +2.1 pts |
| Q4 14:30 | Pass Interference on Cincinnati, 15 yards | +3% BAY +1.9 pts |
| Q4 13:34 | Pass Interference on Cincinnati, 1 yard, wiping out the play | 0% BAY +8.7 pts |
| Q4 12:56 | Holding on Cincinnati, 10 yards | +5% BAY +2.0 pts |
| Q4 4:19 | Personal Foul on Cincinnati, 14 yards | 0% BAY +0.9 pts |
When it happened
Cincinnati’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 14:15 | Pass Interference on Baylor, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +5% CIN | CIN: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q2 9:01 | Baylor was stopped on 4th & 33rd & 4th downs · 46% expected | +3% CIN | BAY: Turnover |
| 3 | Q3 12:19 | Baylor converted 4th & 33rd & 4th downs · 46% expected | +2% BAY | BAY: End of half |
| 4 | Q3 11:05 | Baylor converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 28% expected | +3% BAY | BAY: End of half |
| 5 | Q3 2:26 | Baylor converted 4th & 23rd & 4th downs · 56% expected | +3% BAY | BAY: End of half |
| 6 | Q4 14:30 | Pass Interference on Cincinnati, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +3% BAY | BAY: End of game |
| 7 | Q4 12:56 | Holding on Cincinnati, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +5% BAY | BAY: Turnover on downs |
| 8 | Q4 7:40 | Cincinnati converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 78% expected | +2% CIN | CIN: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Baylor 0% · Cincinnati 100%
- Final margin
- Cincinnati by 21
- Luck in points
- 4.1 for Cincinnati
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Cincinnati by 16.9
- Replay with same day's form
- Baylor 8% · Cincinnati 92% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here. Part of this game's play-by-play is missing from the source: the plays on file account for 47 of the 61 points, so the replay rests on the plays there are.
Methodology and validation · All Week 9 2025 games ·
Baylor ·
Cincinnati
More from Week 9 2025
- BYU at Iowa State BYU 41–27 · replay 26% for the winner
- TCU at West Virginia TCU 23–17 · replay 40% for the winner
- Houston at Arizona State HOU 24–16 · replay 54% for the winner
- Oklahoma State at Texas Tech TTU 42–0 · replay 96% for the winner
- Kansas State at Kansas KSU 42–17 · replay 97% for the winner
- Colorado at Utah UTAH 53–7 · replay 100% for the winner
- Virginia at North Carolina UVA 17–16 · replay 15% for the winner
- South Florida at Memphis MEM 34–31 · replay 28% for the winner
- Akron at Buffalo AKR 24–16 · replay 30% for the winner
- Auburn at Arkansas AUB 33–24 · replay 30% for the winner
- Bowling Green at Kent State KENT 24–21 · replay 38% for the winner
- Alabama at South Carolina ALA 29–22 · replay 38% for the winner