Week 1 2026 · September 4, 2026
Part of this game's play-by-play is missing from the source: the plays on file account for 35 of the 39 points, so the replay rests on the plays there are.
Fresno State at USC, Week 1 2026: who deserved to win?
USC beat Fresno State 39–0, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, USC wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff USC was a 92% favorite.
Final
| 0 | |
| 39 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +1 USC about even · −1 Fresno State
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Fresno State wins 0, USC wins 10.
- 1 FRES 13 USC 19
- 2 FRES 10 USC 21
- 3 FRES 0 USC 16
- 4 FRES 0 USC 19
- 5 FRES 0 USC 21
- 6 FRES 6 USC 31
- 7 FRES 0 USC 28
- 8 FRES 3 USC 35
- 9 FRES 13 USC 48
- 10 FRES 3 USC 45
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Fresno State wins 1% of them, USC 99%. The line is what actually happened: USC by 39.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Fresno State by 17+ | 0.0% |
| Fresno State by 9–16 | 0.2% |
| Fresno State by 1–8 | 0.7% |
| Level after regulation | 0.2% |
| USC by 1–8 | 4.2% |
| USC by 9–16 | 8.2% |
| USC by 17+ | 86.4% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
Penalties: Fresno State 3 for 20 yards, USC 5 for 44 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 5:23 | Illegal Shift on USC, 5 yards, wiping out the play · pre-snap | +1% FRES +1.1 pts |
| Q2 14:39 | False Start on Fresno State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% USC +1.9 pts |
| Q2 7:23 | Intentional Grounding on Fresno State, 10 yards | 0% USC +0.6 pts |
| Q2 4:02 | Roughing the Passer on USC, 15 yards | 0% FRES +0.9 pts |
| Q3 13:20 | Illegal Block on USC, 9 yards | 0% FRES +0.6 pts |
| Q3 9:21 | Offside on Fresno State, 5 yards, wiping out the play · pre-snap | +1% USC +3.3 pts |
| Q3 0:02 | False Start on USC, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% FRES +0.2 pts |
| Q4 13:41 | Holding on USC, 10 yards | 0% FRES +3.6 pts |
When it happened
USC’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 13:58 | USC converted 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 36% expected | +1% USC | USC: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q1 11:12 | USC was stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 49% expected | +1% FRES | USC: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q1 10:56 | USC converted 4th & 53rd & 4th downs · 48% expected | +2% USC | USC: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q1 9:27 | USC converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 31% expected | +2% USC | USC: Turnover |
| 5 | Q1 8:34 | Fresno State converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 31% expected | +1% FRES | FRES: Turnover |
| 6 | Q1 2:32 | USC fumbled and Fresno State recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +1% FRES | USC: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q1 1:39 | Fresno State converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 41% expected | +1% FRES | FRES: Punt |
| 8 | Q2 14:39 | False Start on Fresno State, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +1% USC | USC: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Fresno State 0% · USC 100%
- Final margin
- USC by 39
- Luck in points
- 5.7 for USC
- Luck-adjusted margin
- USC by 33.3
- Replay with same day's form
- Fresno State 1% · USC 99% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here. Part of this game's play-by-play is missing from the source: the plays on file account for 35 of the 39 points, so the replay rests on the plays there are.
Methodology and validation · All Week 1 2026 games ·
Fresno State ·
USC
More from Week 1 2026
- Idaho State at Utah State IDST 29–17 · replay 16% for the winner
- Toledo at Michigan State MSU 30–20 · replay 49% for the winner
- Massachusetts at Rutgers MASS 37–21 · replay 74% for the winner
- Wyoming at Colorado State CSU 35–13 · replay 75% for the winner
- Wisconsin vs Notre Dame ND 41–13 · replay 79% for the winner
- Portland State at San Diego State SDSU 53–20 · replay 80% for the winner
- Western Michigan at Michigan MICH 13–12 · replay 86% for the winner
- Oregon State at Houston HOU 33–20 · replay 89% for the winner
- Washington State at Washington WASH 24–10 · replay 89% for the winner
- Boise State at Oregon ORE 34–27 · replay 91% for the winner
- North Texas at Indiana IU 52–16 · replay 92% for the winner
- Ohio at Nebraska NEB 49–21 · replay 93% for the winner