Week 1 2026 · September 5, 2026
Missouri State at Texas A&M, Week 1 2026: who deserved to win?
Texas A&M beat Missouri State 50–0, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Texas A&M wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Texas A&M was a 99% favorite.
Final
| 0 | |
| 50 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index 0 Texas A&M about even · 0 Missouri State
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Missouri State wins 0, Texas A&M wins 10.
- 1 MOST 0 TA&M 13
- 2 MOST 0 TA&M 17
- 3 MOST 0 TA&M 20
- 4 MOST 0 TA&M 24
- 5 MOST 0 TA&M 26
- 6 MOST 0 TA&M 28
- 7 MOST 0 TA&M 31
- 8 MOST 3 TA&M 37
- 9 MOST 3 TA&M 42
- 10 MOST 3 TA&M 49
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Missouri State wins 0% of them, Texas A&M 100%. The line is what actually happened: Texas A&M by 50.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Missouri State by 17+ | 0.0% |
| Missouri State by 9–16 | 0.1% |
| Missouri State by 1–8 | 0.1% |
| Level after regulation | 0.0% |
| Texas A&M by 1–8 | 2.1% |
| Texas A&M by 9–16 | 6.1% |
| Texas A&M by 17+ | 91.6% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
No play in this game swung win probability by luck.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- D. Olano, 28 yds made · 88% expected
- A. Murray, 47 yds made · 59% expected
Penalties: Missouri State 8 for 41 yards, Texas A&M 8 for 75 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 12:29 | False Start on Texas A&M, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MOST +0.5 pts |
| Q1 9:25 | Roughing the Passer on Texas A&M, 15 yards | 0% MOST +3.5 pts |
| Q1 7:20 | Pass Interference on Texas A&M, 10 yards, wiping out the play | 0% MOST +4.3 pts |
| Q1 5:19 | Delay of Game on Missouri State, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% TA&M +0.4 pts |
| Q1 5:11 | Offside on Missouri State, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% TA&M +0.4 pts |
| Q1 0:36 | Delay of Game on Texas A&M, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MOST +0.1 pts |
| Q1 0:35 | Illegal Kick on Missouri State, 0 yards | 0% TA&M 0.0 pts |
| Q2 11:24 | Holding on Texas A&M, 10 yards | 0% MOST +1.5 pts |
| Q2 11:08 | Holding on Texas A&M, 10 yards | 0% MOST +1.5 pts |
| Q3 15:00 | Offside on Missouri State, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% TA&M +0.3 pts |
| Q3 8:50 | Personal Foul on Texas A&M, 15 yards | 0% MOST +0.9 pts |
| Q3 3:13 | False Start on Texas A&M, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% MOST +0.7 pts |
| Q3 2:16 | Pass Interference on Missouri State, 1 yard | 0% TA&M +0.3 pts |
| Q4 14:26 | Holding on Missouri State, 10 yards | 0% TA&M +0.4 pts |
| Q4 11:50 | Holding on Missouri State, 10 yards | 0% TA&M +0.6 pts |
| Q4 2:29 | Illegal Formation on Missouri State, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% TA&M +0.3 pts |
When it happened
Texas A&M’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 9:25 | Roughing the Passer on Texas A&M, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +0% MOST | MOST: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 7:20 | Pass Interference on Texas A&M, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +0% MOST | MOST: Punt |
| 3 | Q1 5:19 | Missouri State was stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 33% expectedDelay of Game on Missouri State, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +0% TA&M | MOST: Punt |
| 4 | Q2 11:08 | Holding on Texas A&M, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +0% MOST | MOST: Turnover on downs |
| 5 | Q2 9:38 | Missouri State converted 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 44% expectedMissouri State was stopped on 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 54% expectedTexas A&M fumbled and Missouri State recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +0% MOST | MOST: Turnover on downs |
| 6 | Q2 5:57 | Missouri State was stopped on 4th & 23rd & 4th downs · 53% expected | +0% TA&M | MOST: Turnover |
| 7 | Q2 2:40 | Missouri State fumbled and Texas A&M recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +0% TA&M | MOST: End of half |
| 8 | Q4 2:29 | Illegal Formation on Missouri State, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +0% TA&M | TA&M: End of game |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Missouri State 0% · Texas A&M 100%
- Final margin
- Texas A&M by 50
- Luck in points
- 10.9 for Texas A&M
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Texas A&M by 39.1
- Replay with same day's form
- Missouri State 0% · Texas A&M 100% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 1 2026 games ·
Missouri State ·
Texas A&M
More from Week 1 2026
- Florida International at South Florida USF 19–9 · replay 44% for the winner
- Sam Houston at Troy TROY 24–21 · replay 55% for the winner
- Louisville vs Ole Miss MISS 41–38 · replay 57% for the winner
- New Mexico State at Florida State FSU 34–17 · replay 82% for the winner
- Baylor vs Auburn AUB 17–16 · replay 82% for the winner
- Liberty at James Madison JMU 20–13 · replay 89% for the winner
- Murray State at Middle Tennessee MTSU 38–14 · replay 95% for the winner
- Austin Peay at Vanderbilt VAN 28–9 · replay 95% for the winner
- Mercyhurst at New Mexico State NMSU 51–14 · replay 96% for the winner
- Jacksonville State at North Dakota State NDSU 33–7 · replay 97% for the winner
- North Alabama at Arkansas ARK 31–14 · replay 98% for the winner
- Texas State at Texas TEX 59–7 · replay 98% for the winner