Week 1 2026 · September 7, 2026
SMU at Florida State, Week 1 2026: who deserved to win?
SMU beat Florida State 27–24, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, SMU wins 10 of 10. Florida State had the bounces: fumble bounces alone were worth 13 points of win probability to Florida State.
An off day for Florida State: its offense and defense both played far below their usual level. In a fresh game against SMU it would win 42% of the time; with this day’s form, 3%. The numbers
Before kickoff SMU was a 58% favorite. The biggest swing (Q4, 3:45 left): Holding on SMU, 9 yards, wiping out the play, worth 23 points of win probability to Florida State.
Final
| 27 | |
| 24 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +3 SMU about even · −3 Florida State
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. SMU wins 10, Florida State wins 0.
- 1 SMU 48 FSU 3
- 2 SMU 41 FSU 3
- 3 SMU 49 FSU 17
- 4 SMU 35 FSU 6
- 5 SMU 28 FSU 3
- 6 SMU 35 FSU 13
- 7 SMU 30 FSU 10
- 8 SMU 20 FSU 6
- 9 SMU 24 FSU 14
- 10 SMU 30 FSU 26
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
An off day for Florida State
Its offense and defense both played far below their usual level. In a fresh game against SMU it would win 42% of the time; with this day’s form, 3%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
39 points apart for Florida State: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMU offenseEPA per play gained | +0.42 | +0.10 | better by 0.32 |
| SMU defenseEPA per play allowed | −0.01 | +0.03 | better by 0.04 |
| Florida State offenseEPA per play gained | −0.01 | +0.09 | worse by 0.10 |
| Florida State defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.42 | +0.10 | worse by 0.32 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
SMU wins 97% of them, Florida State 3%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: SMU by 3.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| SMU by 17+ | 74.4% |
| SMU by 9–16 | 13.5% |
| SMU by 1–8 | 8.1% |
| Level after regulation | 1.4% |
| Florida State by 1–8 | 2.1% |
| Florida State by 9–16 | 0.4% |
| Florida State by 17+ | 0.1% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- N. Reed, 38 yds missed · 76% expected
- G. Panikowski, 46 yds made · 62% expected
- N. Reed, 22 yds made · 92% expected
- N. Reed, 20 yds made · 93% expected
Penalties: SMU 6 for 48 yards, Florida State 3 for 27 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 12:38 | Illegal Block on SMU, 10 yards | +1% FSU +0.6 pts |
| Q1 2:20 | Face Mask on SMU, 9 yards | +2% FSU +1.1 pts |
| Q2 6:08 | Illegal Substitution on SMU, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% FSU +0.2 pts |
| Q2 5:20 | Illegal Block on Florida State, 10 yards | +3% SMU +1.3 pts |
| Q3 4:48 | Offside on SMU, 5 yards · pre-snap | +8% FSU +2.5 pts |
| Q3 2:00 | Holding on SMU, 10 yards | +4% FSU +1.0 pts |
| Q4 8:30 | False Start on Florida State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +4% SMU +1.0 pts |
| Q4 3:45 | Holding on SMU, 9 yards, wiping out the play | +23% FSU +3.0 pts |
| Q4 2:00 | Face Mask on Florida State, 12 yards | +8% SMU +1.5 pts |
When it happened
Florida State’s chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 53%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q3 6:48 | SMU fumbled and Florida State recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +8% FSU | SMU: Punt |
| 2 | Q3 2:30 | Florida State converted 4th & 23rd & 4th downs · 56% expected | +8% FSU | FSU: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q4 12:37 | SMU converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 41% expected | +8% SMU | SMU: Turnover |
| 4 | Q4 8:17 | Florida State converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 33% expected | +11% FSU | FSU: Punt |
| 5 | Q4 5:20 | Florida State was stopped on 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 31% expected | +8% SMU | FSU: Punt |
| 6 | Q4 3:45 | Holding on SMU, 9 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +23% FSU | FSU: Turnover |
| 7 | Q4 2:45 | SMU converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 30% expected | +21% SMU | SMU: Field goal |
| 8 | Q4 2:00 | Face Mask on Florida State, 12 yardsJudgment calls | +8% SMU | SMU: Field goal |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
SMU 44% · Florida State 56%
- Final margin
- SMU by 3
- Luck in points
- 4.1 for SMU
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Florida State by 1.1
- Replay with same day's form
- SMU 97% · Florida State 3% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 1 2026 games ·
SMU ·
Florida State
More from Week 1 2026
- Colorado at Georgia Tech COLO 14–13 · replay 19% for the winner
- Louisville vs Ole Miss MISS 41–38 · replay 57% for the winner
- North Carolina vs TCU UNC 15–10 · replay 75% for the winner
- New Mexico State at Florida State FSU 34–17 · replay 82% for the winner
- Boston College at Cincinnati CIN 34–15 · replay 89% for the winner
- Akron at Wake Forest WAKE 38–16 · replay 92% for the winner
- Miami (OH) at Pittsburgh PITT 59–14 · replay 96% for the winner
- UCLA at California UCLA 45–24 · replay 96% for the winner
- Tulane at Duke DUKE 17–3 · replay 97% for the winner
- Hawai'i at Stanford STAN 37–27 · replay 97% for the winner
- NC State at Virginia UVA 34–8 · replay 98% for the winner
- Clemson at LSU LSU 51–10 · replay 100% for the winner