Week 1 2025 · August 23, 2025
Fresno State at Kansas, Week 1 2025: who deserved to win?
Kansas beat Fresno State 31–7, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Kansas wins 10 of 10. Fresno State had the bounces: pre-snap flags alone were worth 12 points of win probability to Fresno State.
Before kickoff Kansas was an 82% favorite. The biggest swing (Q1, 7:25 left): Offside on Kansas, 2 yards, worth 12 points of win probability to Fresno State.
Final
| 7 | |
| 31 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index 0 Kansas about even · 0 Fresno State
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Fresno State wins 0, Kansas wins 10.
- 1 FRES 31 KU 49
- 2 FRES 14 KU 41
- 3 FRES 17 KU 49
- 4 FRES 10 KU 45
- 5 FRES 3 KU 42
- 6 FRES 7 KU 49
- 7 FRES 10 KU 56
- 8 FRES 7 KU 56
- 9 FRES 10 KU 63
- 10 FRES 0 KU 59
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Fresno State wins 0% of them, Kansas 100%. The line is what actually happened: Kansas by 24.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Fresno State by 17+ | 0.0% |
| Fresno State by 9–16 | 0.0% |
| Fresno State by 1–8 | 0.0% |
| Level after regulation | 0.1% |
| Kansas by 1–8 | 0.7% |
| Kansas by 9–16 | 1.8% |
| Kansas by 17+ | 97.3% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- L. Marjan, 47 yds made · 59% expected
- D. Lynch, 55 yds missed · 45% expected
Penalties: Fresno State 11 for 110 yards, Kansas 3 for 12 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 7:25 | Offside on Kansas, 2 yards · pre-snap | +12% FRES +1.1 pts |
| Q1 7:20 | Face Mask on Fresno State, 15 yards | 0% KU +1.6 pts |
| Q1 5:51 | Holding on Fresno State, 10 yards | +1% KU +0.6 pts |
| Q1 5:28 | False Start on Fresno State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% FRES +0.5 pts |
| Q1 4:44 | Pass Interference on Fresno State, 15 yards | +2% KU +1.6 pts |
| Q1 3:59 | Holding on Fresno State, 10 yards | +1% KU +0.6 pts |
| Q2 13:16 | Pass Interference on Fresno State, 15 yards | +2% KU +1.6 pts |
| Q2 4:57 | False Start on Fresno State, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% KU +0.9 pts |
| Q3 14:56 | Offside on Fresno State, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% FRES +1.0 pts |
| Q3 9:16 | Holding on Fresno State, 10 yards | 0% KU +0.6 pts |
| Q3 5:03 | Holding on Fresno State, 10 yards | 0% KU +0.6 pts |
| Q4 14:56 | Holding on Kansas, 0 yards | 0% FRES 0.0 pts |
| Q4 12:54 | Holding on Kansas, 10 yards | 0% FRES +0.6 pts |
| Q4 5:52 | Holding on Fresno State, 10 yards | 0% KU +0.6 pts |
When it happened
Kansas’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 13:35 | Kansas converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 43% expected | +2% KU | KU: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q1 12:17 | Kansas converted 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 59% expected | +1% KU | KU: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q1 9:56 | Fresno State converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 36% expected | +2% FRES | FRES: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q1 7:25 | Offside on Kansas, 2 yardsPre-snap flags | +12% FRES | FRES: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q1 4:44 | Pass Interference on Fresno State, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +2% KU | KU: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q1 0:57 | Fresno State converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 26% expected | +3% FRES | FRES: Punt |
| 7 | Q2 13:16 | Pass Interference on Fresno State, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +2% KU | KU: Punt |
| 8 | Q2 11:48 | Kansas was stopped on 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 30% expected | +1% FRES | KU: Punt |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Fresno State 0% · Kansas 100%
- Final margin
- Kansas by 24
- Luck in points
- 3.9 for Fresno State
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Kansas by 27.9
- Replay with same day's form
- Fresno State 0% · Kansas 100% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 1 2025 games ·
Fresno State ·
Kansas
More from Week 1 2025
- Nebraska vs Cincinnati NEB 20–17 · replay 19% for the winner
- Iowa State vs Kansas State ISU 24–21 · replay 31% for the winner
- Central Michigan at San José State CMU 16–14 · replay 65% for the winner
- Idaho State at UNLV UNLV 38–31 · replay 69% for the winner
- Auburn at Baylor AUB 38–24 · replay 71% for the winner
- Utah at UCLA UTAH 43–10 · replay 72% for the winner
- Stanford at Hawai'i HAW 23–20 · replay 75% for the winner
- Jacksonville State at UCF UCF 17–10 · replay 79% for the winner
- UT Martin at Oklahoma State OKST 27–7 · replay 81% for the winner
- Boise State at South Florida USF 34–7 · replay 87% for the winner
- Georgia Tech at Colorado GT 27–20 · replay 88% for the winner
- Hawai'i at Arizona ARIZ 40–6 · replay 90% for the winner