Week 11 2025 · November 8, 2025
Bowling Green at Eastern Michigan, Week 11 2025: who deserved to win?
Eastern Michigan beat Bowling Green 27–21, but the replays lean toward Bowling Green: it takes 7 of 10 with the same day's form. Luck ran its way: 3rd & 4th downs alone were worth 28 points of win probability to Eastern Michigan.
Eastern Michigan won on an off day: it played far below what the matchup promised. In a fresh game against Bowling Green it would win 57% of the time; with this day’s form, 26%. The numbers
Before kickoff Eastern Michigan was a 58% favorite. The biggest swing (Q3, 5:57 left): Eastern Michigan converted 3rd & 12, worth 12 points of win probability to Eastern Michigan.
Final
| 21 | |
| 27 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +74 Eastern Michigan very lucky · −74 Bowling Green
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Bowling Green wins 7, Eastern Michigan wins 3.
- 1 BGSU 37 EMU 6
- 2 BGSU 34 EMU 10
- 3 BGSU 31 EMU 13
- 4 BGSU 38 EMU 24
- 5 BGSU 24 EMU 14
- 6 BGSU 27 EMU 20
- 7 BGSU 23 EMU 20
- 8 BGSU 21 EMU 24
- 9 BGSU 17 EMU 24
- 10 BGSU 24 EMU 40
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
Eastern Michigan won on an off day
It played far below what the matchup promised. In a fresh game against Bowling Green it would win 57% of the time; with this day’s form, 26%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
31 points apart for Eastern Michigan: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bowling Green offenseEPA per play gained | +0.04 | +0.01 | better by 0.03 |
| Bowling Green defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.12 | +0.04 | worse by 0.08 |
| Eastern Michigan offenseEPA per play gained | +0.12 | +0.09 | better by 0.04 |
| Eastern Michigan defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.04 | +0.13 | better by 0.09 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
Bowling Green wins 74% of them, Eastern Michigan 26%, counting the 5% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Eastern Michigan by 6.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Bowling Green by 17+ | 30.4% |
| Bowling Green by 9–16 | 19.3% |
| Bowling Green by 1–8 | 21.0% |
| Level after regulation | 5.0% |
| Eastern Michigan by 1–8 | 14.0% |
| Eastern Michigan by 9–16 | 6.8% |
| Eastern Michigan by 17+ | 3.5% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- R. Kessinger, 27 yds made · 90% expected
- R. Kessinger, 42 yds missed · 70% expected
- R. Kessinger, 44 yds made · 65% expected
Penalties: Bowling Green 9 for 103 yards, Eastern Michigan 6 for 50 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 12:21 | Holding on Bowling Green, 10 yards | +2% EMU +1.2 pts |
| Q1 8:41 | Holding on Bowling Green, 10 yards | 0% EMU +1.3 pts |
| Q1 5:59 | Pass Interference on Bowling Green, 15 yards | +2% EMU +0.8 pts |
| Q1 5:43 | Delay of Game on Bowling Green, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% EMU +0.9 pts |
| Q1 4:05 | Holding on Eastern Michigan, 10 yards, wiping out the play | +7% BGSU +3.4 pts |
| Q2 8:48 | Holding on Eastern Michigan, 10 yards | +3% BGSU +1.6 pts |
| Q2 7:46 | Roughing the Passer on Bowling Green, 15 yards | +4% EMU +2.0 pts |
| Q2 4:36 | Pass Interference on Eastern Michigan, 15 yards | +5% BGSU +2.0 pts |
| Q2 0:58 | False Start on Eastern Michigan, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% BGSU +0.2 pts |
| Q3 12:19 | Holding on Bowling Green, 10 yards | +2% EMU +0.6 pts |
| Q3 9:20 | Pass Interference on Bowling Green, 15 yards | +5% EMU +1.6 pts |
| Q3 9:16 | False Start on Eastern Michigan, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% BGSU +0.8 pts |
| Q3 8:36 | Pass Interference on Bowling Green, 15 yards | +5% EMU +1.7 pts |
| Q3 6:22 | False Start on Eastern Michigan, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% BGSU +0.5 pts |
| Q3 1:58 | Pass Interference on Bowling Green, 8 yards | +3% EMU +0.9 pts |
When it happened
Eastern Michigan’s chance of winning
As low as 40% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 12:43 | Eastern Michigan converted 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 28% expected | +5% EMU | EMU: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q1 4:05 | Holding on Eastern Michigan, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +7% BGSU | BGSU: Punt |
| 3 | Q3 12:57 | Eastern Michigan was stopped on 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 75% expected | +6% BGSU | EMU: Punt |
| 4 | Q3 8:36 | Pass Interference on Bowling Green, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +5% EMU | EMU: End of half |
| 5 | Q3 5:57 | Eastern Michigan converted 3rd & 123rd & 4th downs · 22% expected | +12% EMU | EMU: Punt |
| 6 | Q4 14:12 | Bowling Green was stopped on 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 76% expected | +6% EMU | BGSU: Punt |
| 7 | Q4 2:59 | Eastern Michigan converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 33% expected | +9% EMU | EMU: Field goal |
| 8 | Q4 1:54 | Eastern Michigan converted 3rd & 123rd & 4th downs · 23% expected | +8% EMU | EMU: Field goal |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Bowling Green 39% · Eastern Michigan 61%
- Final margin
- Eastern Michigan by 6
- Luck in points
- 4.5 for Eastern Michigan
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Eastern Michigan by 1.5
- Replay with same day's form
- Bowling Green 74% · Eastern Michigan 26% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 11 2025 games ·
Bowling Green ·
Eastern Michigan
More from Week 11 2025
- Kent State at Ball State BALL 17–13 · replay 40% for the winner
- Miami (OH) at Ohio OHIO 24–20 · replay 60% for the winner
- Massachusetts at Akron AKR 44–10 · replay 100% for the winner
- Northern Illinois at Toledo TOL 42–3 · replay 100% for the winner
- Sam Houston at Oregon State SHSU 21–17 · replay 2% for the winner
- Air Force at San José State AF 26–16 · replay 5% for the winner
- Texas State at Louisiana UL 42–39 · replay 14% for the winner
- Iowa State at TCU ISU 20–17 · replay 22% for the winner
- Wake Forest at Virginia WAKE 16–9 · replay 22% for the winner
- Washington at Wisconsin WIS 13–10 · replay 23% for the winner
- Louisiana Tech at Delaware DEL 25–24 · replay 25% for the winner
- Stanford at North Carolina UNC 20–15 · replay 34% for the winner