Week 11 2025 · November 5, 2025
Northern Illinois at Toledo, Week 11 2025: who deserved to win?
Toledo beat Northern Illinois 42–3, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Toledo wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff Toledo was an 83% favorite.
Final
| 3 | |
| 42 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index 0 Toledo about even · 0 Northern Illinois
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Northern Illinois wins 0, Toledo wins 10.
- 1 NIU 0 TOL 14
- 2 NIU 7 TOL 29
- 3 NIU 3 TOL 31
- 4 NIU 3 TOL 34
- 5 NIU 3 TOL 38
- 6 NIU 10 TOL 48
- 7 NIU 14 TOL 56
- 8 NIU 3 TOL 49
- 9 NIU 0 TOL 52
- 10 NIU 0 TOL 58
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Northern Illinois wins 0% of them, Toledo 100%. The line is what actually happened: Toledo by 39.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Northern Illinois by 17+ | 0.0% |
| Northern Illinois by 9–16 | 0.0% |
| Northern Illinois by 1–8 | 0.1% |
| Level after regulation | 0.0% |
| Toledo by 1–8 | 0.1% |
| Toledo by 9–16 | 1.2% |
| Toledo by 17+ | 98.6% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- A. Glass, 50 yds made · 54% expected
- A. Glass, 43 yds missed · 67% expected
- D. Cunanan, 46 yds missed · 60% expected
Penalties: Northern Illinois 7 for 74 yards, Toledo 9 for 77 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 10:46 | Pass Interference on Toledo, 5 yards | +3% NIU +3.9 pts |
| Q1 7:38 | Pass Interference on Northern Illinois, 15 yards | +1% TOL +1.3 pts |
| Q1 5:24 | Holding on Toledo, 10 yards, wiping out the play | +5% NIU +3.8 pts |
| Q2 6:25 | Pass Interference on Toledo, 15 yards, wiping out the play | +2% NIU +4.2 pts |
| Q2 5:57 | False Start on Toledo, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% NIU +0.5 pts |
| Q2 4:58 | False Start on Northern Illinois, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% TOL 0.0 pts |
| Q2 0:57 | Pass Interference on Northern Illinois, 15 yards | 0% TOL +0.5 pts |
| Q3 10:11 | Pass Interference on Toledo, 9 yards, wiping out the play | 0% NIU +5.8 pts |
| Q3 3:08 | False Start on Toledo, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% NIU +0.3 pts |
| Q3 3:03 | Holding on Toledo, 10 yards | 0% NIU +1.8 pts |
| Q4 13:37 | Intentional Grounding on Northern Illinois, 14 yards | 0% TOL +0.9 pts |
| Q4 12:36 | Illegal Formation on Northern Illinois, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% TOL +0.3 pts |
| Q4 9:55 | Delay of Game on Northern Illinois, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% TOL +0.3 pts |
| Q4 7:05 | Illegal Shift on Toledo, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% NIU +0.6 pts |
| Q4 4:13 | Chop Block on Northern Illinois, 15 yards | 0% TOL +1.2 pts |
| Q4 0:46 | Personal Foul on Toledo, 13 yards | 0% NIU +1.3 pts |
When it happened
Toledo’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 12:40 | Northern Illinois converted 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 25% expected | +2% NIU | NIU: Field goal |
| 2 | Q1 10:46 | Pass Interference on Toledo, 5 yardsJudgment calls | +3% NIU | NIU: Field goal |
| 3 | Q1 7:55 | Toledo converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 46% expected | +2% TOL | TOL: Punt |
| 4 | Q1 5:24 | Holding on Toledo, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +5% NIU | NIU: Punt |
| 5 | Q1 1:09 | Toledo was stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 53% expected | +2% NIU | TOL: Punt |
| 6 | Q2 11:33 | Toledo converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 46% expected | +2% TOL | TOL: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q2 6:25 | Pass Interference on Toledo, 15 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +2% NIU | NIU: Punt |
| 8 | Q2 5:18 | Toledo converted 3rd & 183rd & 4th downs · 16% expected | +2% TOL | TOL: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Northern Illinois 0% · Toledo 100%
- Final margin
- Toledo by 39
- Luck in points
- 5.3 for Toledo
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Toledo by 33.7
- Replay with same day's form
- Northern Illinois 0% · Toledo 100% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 11 2025 games ·
Northern Illinois ·
Toledo
More from Week 11 2025
- Bowling Green at Eastern Michigan EMU 27–21 · replay 26% for the winner
- Kent State at Ball State BALL 17–13 · replay 40% for the winner
- Miami (OH) at Ohio OHIO 24–20 · replay 60% for the winner
- Massachusetts at Akron AKR 44–10 · replay 100% for the winner
- Sam Houston at Oregon State SHSU 21–17 · replay 2% for the winner
- Air Force at San José State AF 26–16 · replay 5% for the winner
- Texas State at Louisiana UL 42–39 · replay 14% for the winner
- Iowa State at TCU ISU 20–17 · replay 22% for the winner
- Wake Forest at Virginia WAKE 16–9 · replay 22% for the winner
- Washington at Wisconsin WIS 13–10 · replay 23% for the winner
- Louisiana Tech at Delaware DEL 25–24 · replay 25% for the winner
- Stanford at North Carolina UNC 20–15 · replay 34% for the winner