Week 11 2025 · November 6, 2025
UTSA at South Florida, Week 11 2025: who deserved to win?
South Florida beat UTSA 55–23, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, South Florida wins 10 of 10.
Before kickoff South Florida was an 82% favorite. The biggest swing (Q1, 7:06 left): Return touchdown by South Florida, worth 17 points of win probability to South Florida.
Final
| 23 | |
| 55 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +3 South Florida about even · −3 UTSA
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. UTSA wins 0, South Florida wins 10.
- 1 UTSA 21 USF 27
- 2 UTSA 12 USF 24
- 3 UTSA 7 USF 23
- 4 UTSA 10 USF 30
- 5 UTSA 9 USF 31
- 6 UTSA 10 USF 37
- 7 UTSA 7 USF 38
- 8 UTSA 14 USF 48
- 9 UTSA 14 USF 53
- 10 UTSA 10 USF 56
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
UTSA wins 3% of them, South Florida 97%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: South Florida by 32.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| UTSA by 17+ | 0.1% |
| UTSA by 9–16 | 0.4% |
| UTSA by 1–8 | 1.8% |
| Level after regulation | 0.7% |
| South Florida by 1–8 | 6.2% |
| South Florida by 9–16 | 10.2% |
| South Florida by 17+ | 80.5% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- M. Petro, 33 yds made · 84% expected
- N. Gramatica, 40 yds made · 74% expected
- M. Petro, 39 yds made · 76% expected
- N. Gramatica, 51 yds made · 54% expected
- M. Petro, 27 yds made · 91% expected
Penalties: UTSA 11 for 85 yards, South Florida 5 for 56 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 14:23 | Pass Interference on South Florida, 11 yards | +1% UTSA +1.3 pts |
| Q1 10:13 | False Start on UTSA, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% USF +0.6 pts |
| Q1 7:22 | Pass Interference on South Florida, 15 yards | +4% UTSA +3.4 pts |
| Q1 6:15 | Pass Interference on UTSA, 15 yards, wiping out the play | +3% USF +4.2 pts |
| Q2 13:28 | Holding on South Florida, 10 yards, wiping out the play | 0% UTSA +0.7 pts |
| Q2 12:19 | Illegal Shift on UTSA, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% USF +1.4 pts |
| Q2 11:24 | False Start on UTSA, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% USF +0.5 pts |
| Q2 7:24 | Delay of Game on UTSA, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% USF +0.2 pts |
| Q2 5:06 | False Start on UTSA, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% USF +0.5 pts |
| Q2 3:23 | Illegal Substitution on South Florida, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% USF +0.1 pts |
| Q3 9:25 | False Start on UTSA, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% USF +3.8 pts |
| Q3 7:24 | Personal Foul on South Florida, 15 yards | 0% UTSA +1.6 pts |
| Q4 14:29 | False Start on UTSA, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% USF +0.9 pts |
| Q4 11:26 | Unnecessary Roughness on UTSA, 15 yards | 0% USF +1.6 pts |
| Q4 11:21 | Unnecessary Roughness on UTSA, 15 yards | 0% USF +1.1 pts |
| Q4 9:58 | Illegal Snap on UTSA, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% USF +0.7 pts |
When it happened
South Florida’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 14:23 | Pass Interference on South Florida, 11 yardsJudgment calls | +1% UTSA | UTSA: Field goal |
| 2 | Q1 11:48 | UTSA converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 31% expected | +2% UTSA | UTSA: Field goal |
| 3 | Q1 10:39 | UTSA converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 34% expected | +2% UTSA | UTSA: Field goal |
| 4 | Q1 8:34 | UTSA converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 70% expected | +1% UTSA | UTSA: Field goal |
| 5 | Q1 7:22 | Pass Interference on South Florida, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +4% UTSA | UTSA: Field goal |
| 6 | Q1 7:06 | UTSA fumbled and South Florida recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50Return touchdown by South FloridaSpecial teams | +17% USF | UTSA: Field goal |
| 7 | Q1 6:15 | Pass Interference on UTSA, 15 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +3% USF | USF: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q1 3:01 | UTSA converted 4th & 113rd & 4th downs · 25% expected | +3% UTSA | UTSA: Field goal |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
UTSA 0% · South Florida 100%
- Final margin
- South Florida by 32
- Luck in points
- 7.9 for South Florida
- Luck-adjusted margin
- South Florida by 24.1
- Replay with same day's form
- UTSA 3% · South Florida 97% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 11 2025 games ·
UTSA ·
South Florida
More from Week 11 2025
- UAB at Rice RICE 24–17 · replay 35% for the winner
- Temple at Army ARMY 14–13 · replay 48% for the winner
- Tulane at Memphis TULN 38–32 · replay 74% for the winner
- Tulsa at Florida Atlantic FAU 40–21 · replay 80% for the winner
- Charlotte at East Carolina ECU 48–22 · replay 91% for the winner
- Navy at Notre Dame ND 49–10 · replay 100% for the winner
- Sam Houston at Oregon State SHSU 21–17 · replay 2% for the winner
- Air Force at San José State AF 26–16 · replay 5% for the winner
- Texas State at Louisiana UL 42–39 · replay 14% for the winner
- Iowa State at TCU ISU 20–17 · replay 22% for the winner
- Wake Forest at Virginia WAKE 16–9 · replay 22% for the winner
- Washington at Wisconsin WIS 13–10 · replay 23% for the winner