Week 13 2025 · November 19, 2025
Miami (OH) at Buffalo, Week 13 2025: who deserved to win?
Miami (OH) beat Buffalo 37–20, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Miami (OH) wins 8 of 10. Buffalo had the bounces: 3rd & 4th downs alone were worth 13 points of win probability to Buffalo.
Before kickoff Miami (OH) was a 56% favorite. The biggest swing (Q3, 10:24 left): Miami (OH) was stopped on 4th & 1, worth 10 points of win probability to Buffalo.
Final
| 37 | |
| 20 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +20 Miami (OH) about even · −20 Buffalo
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Miami (OH) wins 8, Buffalo wins 2.
- 1 M-OH 45 BUF 7
- 2 M-OH 38 BUF 13
- 3 M-OH 28 BUF 7
- 4 M-OH 28 BUF 10
- 5 M-OH 37 BUF 23
- 6 M-OH 21 BUF 10
- 7 M-OH 33 BUF 26
- 8 M-OH 10 BUF 7
- 9 M-OH 17 BUF 21
- 10 M-OH 7 BUF 21
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Miami (OH) wins 80% of them, Buffalo 20%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Miami (OH) by 17.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Miami (OH) by 17+ | 42.4% |
| Miami (OH) by 9–16 | 19.6% |
| Miami (OH) by 1–8 | 17.7% |
| Level after regulation | 1.5% |
| Buffalo by 1–8 | 9.9% |
| Buffalo by 9–16 | 6.0% |
| Buffalo by 17+ | 2.9% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- J. Howes, 33 yds made · 84% expected
- D. Dzioban, 49 yds made · 60% expected
- D. Dzioban, 42 yds made · 73% expected
- J. Howes, 47 yds made · 60% expected
- D. Dzioban, 37 yds made · 82% expected
- D. Dzioban, 49 yds made · 61% expected
Penalties: Miami (OH) 4 for 25 yards, Buffalo 8 for 44 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 12:55 | False Start on Buffalo, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% M-OH +1.1 pts |
| Q1 9:15 | False Start on Miami (OH), 5 yards · pre-snap | +3% BUF +1.7 pts |
| Q1 7:45 | Holding on Buffalo, 9 yards | +1% M-OH +0.6 pts |
| Q2 13:35 | Offside on Miami (OH), 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% BUF +0.3 pts |
| Q2 11:55 | False Start on Buffalo, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% M-OH +0.8 pts |
| Q2 7:32 | False Start on Buffalo, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% M-OH +0.3 pts |
| Q2 3:16 | False Start on Buffalo, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% BUF +0.4 pts |
| Q2 1:43 | Holding on Miami (OH), 10 yards | 0% BUF +0.3 pts |
| Q4 12:49 | False Start on Buffalo, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% M-OH +0.7 pts |
| Q4 12:02 | False Start on Buffalo, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% M-OH +0.6 pts |
| Q4 8:49 | False Start on Miami (OH), 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% BUF +0.4 pts |
| Q4 2:45 | False Start on Buffalo, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% M-OH +0.4 pts |
When it happened
Buffalo’s chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 61%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 5:52 | Buffalo converted 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +6% BUF | BUF: Field goal |
| 2 | Q2 9:39 | Miami (OH) converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 26% expected | +6% M-OH | M-OH: Punt |
| 3 | Q2 0:13 | Buffalo converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 29% expected | +5% BUF | BUF: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q3 11:01 | Miami (OH) was stopped on 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 62% expected | +5% BUF | M-OH: Turnover on downs |
| 5 | Q3 10:24 | Miami (OH) was stopped on 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 74% expected | +10% BUF | M-OH: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q3 6:50 | J. Howes made a 47-yard field goalKicks · 60% expected for him, 2 of 3 from 45+ before | +5% BUF | BUF: Punt |
| 7 | Q3 4:50 | Buffalo was stopped on 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 45% expected | +4% M-OH | BUF: Punt |
| 8 | Q3 3:26 | Miami (OH) was stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 41% expected | +4% BUF | M-OH: Punt |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Miami (OH) 100% · Buffalo 0%
- Final margin
- Miami (OH) by 17
- Luck in points
- 5.8 for Buffalo
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Miami (OH) by 22.8
- Replay with same day's form
- Miami (OH) 80% · Buffalo 20% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 13 2025 games ·
Miami (OH) ·
Buffalo
More from Week 13 2025
- Akron at Bowling Green AKR 19–16 · replay 64% for the winner
- Central Michigan at Kent State CMU 28–16 · replay 65% for the winner
- Massachusetts at Ohio OHIO 42–14 · replay 97% for the winner
- Western Michigan at Northern Illinois WMU 35–19 · replay 100% for the winner
- Ball State at Toledo TOL 38–9 · replay 100% for the winner
- Marshall at App State APP 26–24 · replay 13% for the winner
- Duke at North Carolina DUKE 32–25 · replay 13% for the winner
- Louisiana at Arkansas State UL 34–30 · replay 16% for the winner
- Florida State at NC State NCSU 21–11 · replay 18% for the winner
- Missouri State at Kennesaw State KENN 41–34 · replay 23% for the winner
- UConn at Florida Atlantic CONN 48–45 · replay 25% for the winner
- Utah State at Fresno State USU 28–17 · replay 30% for the winner