Week 14 2025 · November 29, 2025
UCLA at USC, Week 14 2025: who deserved to win?
USC beat UCLA 29–10, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, USC wins 9 of 10.
Before kickoff USC was a 92% favorite.
Final
| 10 | |
| 29 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +7 USC about even · −7 UCLA
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. UCLA wins 1, USC wins 9.
- 1 UCLA 27 USC 21
- 2 UCLA 14 USC 17
- 3 UCLA 10 USC 17
- 4 UCLA 10 USC 21
- 5 UCLA 3 USC 17
- 6 UCLA 10 USC 27
- 7 UCLA 0 USC 20
- 8 UCLA 0 USC 23
- 9 UCLA 10 USC 38
- 10 UCLA 7 USC 42
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
UCLA wins 7% of them, USC 93%. The line is what actually happened: USC by 19.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| UCLA by 17+ | 0.4% |
| UCLA by 9–16 | 1.6% |
| UCLA by 1–8 | 4.8% |
| Level after regulation | 0.2% |
| USC by 1–8 | 14.8% |
| USC by 9–16 | 21.3% |
| USC by 17+ | 56.9% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- R. Sayeri, 38 yds blocked · 79% expected
- R. Sayeri, 30 yds missed · 88% expected
- M. Bhaghani, 38 yds made · 79% expected
Penalties: UCLA 5 for 34 yards, USC 3 for 30 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 8:13 | Holding on USC, 10 yards | 0% UCLA +0.6 pts |
| Q1 0:05 | Offside on USC, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% UCLA +0.5 pts |
| Q3 15:00 | Unnecessary Roughness on UCLA, 14 yards | +2% USC +0.9 pts |
| Q4 9:54 | False Start on UCLA, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% USC +0.7 pts |
| Q4 8:46 | Delay of Game on UCLA, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% USC +0.5 pts |
| Q4 5:52 | Delay of Game on UCLA, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% USC +0.5 pts |
| Q4 5:32 | False Start on UCLA, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% USC +0.4 pts |
| Q4 2:29 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on USC, 15 yards | 0% UCLA +1.6 pts |
When it happened
USC’s chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q2 5:42 | R. Sayeri missed a 30-yard field goalKicks · 88% expected for him | +4% UCLA | USC: End of half |
| 2 | Q3 12:30 | USC was stopped on 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 37% expected | +3% UCLA | USC: Punt |
| 3 | Q3 11:36 | UCLA fumbled and recovered itFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +3% UCLA | UCLA: Punt |
| 4 | Q3 10:42 | UCLA converted 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 62% expected | +3% UCLA | UCLA: Punt |
| 5 | Q3 6:00 | UCLA was stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 41% expected | +4% USC | UCLA: Punt |
| 6 | Q3 3:22 | USC converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 57% expected | +4% USC | USC: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q3 1:33 | USC converted 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 64% expected | +3% USC | USC: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q4 14:08 | UCLA was stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 36% expected | +3% USC | UCLA: Punt |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
UCLA 0% · USC 100%
- Final margin
- USC by 19
- Luck in points
- 3.7 for UCLA
- Luck-adjusted margin
- USC by 22.7
- Replay with same day's form
- UCLA 7% · USC 93% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 14 2025 games ·
UCLA ·
USC
More from Week 14 2025
- Oregon at Washington ORE 26–14 · replay 34% for the winner
- Wisconsin at Minnesota MINN 17–7 · replay 38% for the winner
- Penn State at Rutgers PSU 40–36 · replay 51% for the winner
- Maryland vs Michigan State MSU 38–28 · replay 55% for the winner
- Iowa at Nebraska IOWA 40–16 · replay 76% for the winner
- Northwestern at Illinois ILL 20–13 · replay 88% for the winner
- Ohio State at Michigan OSU 27–9 · replay 95% for the winner
- Indiana at Purdue IU 56–3 · replay 100% for the winner
- UL Monroe at Louisiana UL 30–27 · replay 13% for the winner
- SMU at California CAL 38–35 · replay 18% for the winner
- Utah at Kansas UTAH 31–21 · replay 20% for the winner
- Army at UTSA ARMY 27–24 · replay 24% for the winner