luckadjusted
CFB Week 4 · 2026

Week 14 2025 · November 29, 2025

Virginia Tech at Virginia, Week 14 2025: who deserved to win?

Virginia beat Virginia Tech 27–7, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, Virginia wins 10 of 10.

Before kickoff Virginia was a 71% favorite.

Final

Virginia Tech Hokies 7
Virginia Cavaliers 27

November 29, 2025 · Scott Stadium · Closing line: Virginia −8.5

Luck index +2 Virginia about even · −2 Virginia Tech

Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works

Ten replays. Virginia Tech wins 0, Virginia wins 10.

  1. 1 VT 3 UVA 7
  2. 2 VT 9 UVA 17
  3. 3 VT 3 UVA 16
  4. 4 VT 2 UVA 17
  5. 5 VT 3 UVA 20
  6. 6 VT 0 UVA 20
  7. 7 VT 0 UVA 23
  8. 8 VT 0 UVA 24
  9. 9 VT 0 UVA 29
  10. 10 VT 0 UVA 38

Three other ways to ask

Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.

The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.

The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.

Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.

How 4,000 replays ended

Virginia Tech wins 1% of them, Virginia 99%. The line is what actually happened: Virginia by 20.

Show as a table
Final margin in the replaysShare of replays
Virginia Tech by 17+0.0%
Virginia Tech by 9–160.1%
Virginia Tech by 1–81.3%
Level after regulation0.3%
Virginia by 1–85.5%
Virginia by 9–1617.3%
Virginia by 17+75.5%

Where the luck was

What the luck was worth

Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.

Swings add up across a game, so in one that went back and forth they can pass 100%. On the scoreboard the same luck was worth +7.2 points to Virginia: the final margin was Virginia by 20, without the luck Virginia by 12.8. Luck shares are the fitted ones (how much of each kind is luck).

The kicks

How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.

  • J. Love, 45 yds missed · 68% expected
  • W. Bettridge, 27 yds made · 91% expected
  • W. Bettridge, 32 yds made · 86% expected
Bar: expected chance of a make. Filled dot: made. Open dot: missed or blocked.

Penalties: Virginia Tech 6 for 44 yards, Virginia 4 for 35 yards

Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued

WhenFlagWin probability for
Q1 8:17 Holding on Virginia Tech, 8 yards +1% UVA +0.5 pts
Q2 12:42 Delay of Game on Virginia Tech, 5 yards · pre-snap 0% UVA +0.3 pts
Q2 12:24 Holding on Virginia, 10 yards +1% VT +0.6 pts
Q2 11:13 False Start on Virginia, 5 yards · pre-snap +1% VT +0.6 pts
Q2 4:26 Illegal Block on Virginia Tech, 10 yards +1% UVA +0.6 pts
Q2 0:38 Holding on Virginia, 10 yards 0% VT +0.4 pts
Q3 12:43 Illegal Block on Virginia Tech, 4 yards 0% UVA +0.2 pts
Q3 12:41 False Start on Virginia Tech, 2 yards · pre-snap 0% UVA +0.3 pts
Q4 12:47 Pass Interference on Virginia Tech, 15 yards 0% UVA +1.8 pts
Q4 11:58 Holding on Virginia, 10 yards 0% VT +0.7 pts

When it happened

Virginia’s chance of winning

Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.

Our in-game win probability: the score, the value of the possession and the time left, starting from the betting line. Overtime has no clock and is drawn at a fixed width. Shaded above the middle while Virginia was ahead in it, below while Virginia Tech was.
#WhenWhat happenedWin probability forNext drive
1 Q1 13:34 Virginia Tech converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 42% expected +3% VT VT: Turnover
2 Q1 9:16 Virginia converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 40% expected +3% UVA UVA: Touchdown
3 Q1 6:01 Virginia Tech converted 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 58% expected +2% VT VT: Missed field goal
4 Q1 3:48 Virginia Tech converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 72% expected +3% VT VT: Missed field goal
5 Q1 1:47 J. Love missed a 45-yard field goalKicks · 68% expected for him, 10 of 17 from 45+ before +4% UVA VT: Punt
6 Q2 13:25 Virginia Tech was stopped on 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 42% expected +2% UVA VT: Punt
7 Q2 5:07 Virginia converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 42% expected +2% UVA UVA: End of half
8 Q3 9:24 Virginia converted 4th & 43rd & 4th downs · 49% expected +2% UVA UVA: Field goal

Adjust the assumptions

Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.

Only coin-flips re-rolled

Virginia Tech 1% · Virginia 99%

Final margin
Virginia by 20
Luck in points
7.2 for Virginia
Luck-adjusted margin
Virginia by 12.8
Replay with same day's form
Virginia Tech 1% · Virginia 99% unchanged: why
How much of each is luck?

0% treats it as skill, 100% as pure luck. The tick is our fit.

What counts

None by default: our tests measured no carryover after a lucky break. Slide it up to count a break for more than its own swing. Why

Flip a play

Force the other outcome, in this game and in every replay: a made kick becomes a miss, a stop becomes a conversion, a flag goes the other way.

About these numbers

Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.

Methodology and validation · All Week 14 2025 games · Virginia Tech · Virginia

More from Week 14 2025

Every week 14 game, 2025