Week 3 2025 · September 13, 2025
Texas A&M at Notre Dame, Week 3 2025: who deserved to win?
Texas A&M beat Notre Dame 41–40, but the replays lean toward Notre Dame: it takes 6 of 10 with the same day's form. Luck ran its way: 3rd & 4th downs alone were worth 15 points of win probability to Texas A&M.
Before kickoff Notre Dame was a 66% favorite. The game turned on a luck play (Q4, 0:13 left): Texas A&M converted 4th & 11, worth 34 points of win probability to Texas A&M.
Final
| 41 | |
| 40 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +63 Texas A&M very lucky · −63 Notre Dame
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Texas A&M wins 4, Notre Dame wins 6.
- 1 TA&M 56 ND 31
- 2 TA&M 31 ND 17
- 3 TA&M 31 ND 23
- 4 TA&M 17 ND 14
- 5 TA&M 33 ND 35
- 6 TA&M 30 ND 35
- 7 TA&M 24 ND 31
- 8 TA&M 28 ND 40
- 9 TA&M 20 ND 38
- 10 TA&M 17 ND 45
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Texas A&M wins 37% of them, Notre Dame 63%, counting the 5% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Texas A&M by 1.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Texas A&M by 17+ | 8.2% |
| Texas A&M by 9–16 | 9.6% |
| Texas A&M by 1–8 | 15.8% |
| Level after regulation | 4.8% |
| Notre Dame by 1–8 | 22.5% |
| Notre Dame by 9–16 | 17.2% |
| Notre Dame by 17+ | 21.9% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- N. Burnette, 22 yds made · 93% expected
- R. Bond, 52 yds missed · 52% expected
- R. Bond, 43 yds made · 68% expected
- N. Burnette, 39 yds made · 75% expected
- R. Bond, 45 yds made · 64% expected
Penalties: Texas A&M 13 for 85 yards, Notre Dame 5 for 31 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 14:25 | Holding on Texas A&M, 10 yards | +3% ND +1.4 pts |
| Q1 13:06 | False Start on Texas A&M, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% ND +0.8 pts |
| Q1 8:12 | Unnecessary Roughness on Texas A&M, 15 yards | +6% ND +3.2 pts |
| Q2 8:20 | False Start on Texas A&M, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% ND +0.6 pts |
| Q2 1:55 | Face Mask on Notre Dame, 1 yard | +2% TA&M +0.8 pts |
| Q2 1:04 | Holding on Texas A&M, 10 yards | +1% ND +0.3 pts |
| Q3 14:25 | False Start on Notre Dame, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% TA&M +0.8 pts |
| Q3 12:16 | Intentional Grounding on Notre Dame, 0 yards | 0% TA&M 0.0 pts |
| Q3 11:30 | False Start on Texas A&M, 1 yard · pre-snap | 0% TA&M 0.0 pts |
| Q3 6:20 | False Start on Texas A&M, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% ND +0.6 pts |
| Q3 6:11 | Illegal Formation on Texas A&M, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% ND +0.3 pts |
| Q4 13:51 | Personal Foul on Notre Dame, 15 yards | +11% TA&M +2.9 pts |
| Q4 11:41 | False Start on Texas A&M, 5 yards · pre-snap | +3% ND +0.6 pts |
| Q4 10:19 | False Start on Texas A&M, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% ND +0.5 pts |
| Q4 2:53 | Holding on Texas A&M, 9 yards | +2% ND +0.6 pts |
| Q4 0:54 | False Start on Texas A&M, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% ND +0.3 pts |
| Q4 0:54 | False Start on Texas A&M, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% ND +0.3 pts |
| Q4 0:39 | Holding on Notre Dame, 10 yards | +11% TA&M +1.9 pts |
When it happened
Notre Dame’s chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 93%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 13:06 | False Start on Texas A&M, 5 yardsPre-snap flagsReturn touchdown by Notre DameSpecial teams | +9% ND | ND: Punt |
| 2 | Q3 3:34 | Notre Dame was stopped on 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 77% expected | +13% TA&M | ND: Field goal |
| 3 | Q4 13:51 | Personal Foul on Notre Dame, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +11% TA&M | TA&M: Field goal |
| 4 | Q4 11:10 | Texas A&M converted 3rd & 123rd & 4th downs · 23% expected | +11% TA&M | TA&M: Field goal |
| 5 | Q4 7:48 | Notre Dame converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 35% expected | +12% ND | ND: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q4 3:35 | Notre Dame converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 77% expected | +9% ND | ND: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q4 0:39 | Holding on Notre Dame, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +11% TA&M | TA&M: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q4 0:13 | The game turned hereTexas A&M converted 4th & 113rd & 4th downs · 25% expected | +34% TA&M | – |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Texas A&M 52% · Notre Dame 48%
- Final margin
- Texas A&M by 1
- Luck in points
- 0.4 for Texas A&M
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Texas A&M by 0.6
- Replay with same day's form
- Texas A&M 37% · Notre Dame 63% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 3 2025 games ·
Texas A&M ·
Notre Dame
More from Week 3 2025
- Georgia at Tennessee UGA 44–41 · replay 20% for the winner
- Florida at LSU LSU 20–10 · replay 30% for the winner
- Arkansas at Ole Miss MISS 41–35 · replay 37% for the winner
- UConn at Delaware DEL 44–41 · replay 50% for the winner
- Vanderbilt at South Carolina VAN 31–7 · replay 67% for the winner
- UTEP at Texas TEX 27–10 · replay 89% for the winner
- Eastern Michigan at Kentucky UK 48–23 · replay 90% for the winner
- South Alabama at Auburn AUB 31–15 · replay 91% for the winner
- Wisconsin at Alabama ALA 38–14 · replay 96% for the winner
- Louisiana at Missouri MIZ 52–10 · replay 100% for the winner
- Oklahoma at Temple OU 42–3 · replay 100% for the winner
- Alcorn State at Mississippi State MSST 63–0 · replay 100% for the winner