Week 6 2025 · October 4, 2025
Central Michigan at Akron, Week 6 2025: who deserved to win?
Akron beat Central Michigan 28–22, and the replays lean its way: with the same day's form, it wins 8 of 10.
An off day for Central Michigan: its defense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against Akron it would win 59% of the time; with this day’s form, 24%. The numbers
Before kickoff Central Michigan was a 68% favorite. The biggest swing (Q2, 0:11 left): Intentional Grounding on Central Michigan, 64 yards, worth 16 points of win probability to Akron.
Final
| 22 | |
| 28 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +24 Akron about even · −24 Central Michigan
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Central Michigan wins 2, Akron wins 8.
- 1 CMU 16 AKR 3
- 2 CMU 24 AKR 21
- 3 CMU 28 AKR 31
- 4 CMU 16 AKR 21
- 5 CMU 19 AKR 28
- 6 CMU 10 AKR 21
- 7 CMU 14 AKR 28
- 8 CMU 10 AKR 28
- 9 CMU 14 AKR 36
- 10 CMU 7 AKR 40
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
An off day for Central Michigan
Its defense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against Akron it would win 59% of the time; with this day’s form, 24%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
34 points apart for Central Michigan: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Central Michigan offenseEPA per play gained | +0.13 | +0.02 | better by 0.10 |
| Central Michigan defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.45 | +0.08 | worse by 0.37 |
| Akron offenseEPA per play gained | +0.45 | −0.01 | better by 0.46 |
| Akron defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.13 | +0.06 | worse by 0.06 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
Central Michigan wins 24% of them, Akron 76%, counting the 4% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Akron by 6.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Central Michigan by 17+ | 3.5% |
| Central Michigan by 9–16 | 6.5% |
| Central Michigan by 1–8 | 13.9% |
| Level after regulation | 4.0% |
| Akron by 1–8 | 22.1% |
| Akron by 9–16 | 19.4% |
| Akron by 17+ | 30.5% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance), and what happened.
- C. Graham, 46 yds made · 60% expected
- O. Wiley, 48 yds missed · 55% expected
- C. Graham, 35 yds made · 80% expected
- C. Graham, 47 yds made · 59% expected
Penalties: Central Michigan 9 for 164 yards, Akron 8 for 69 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count toward luck, pre-snap fouls mostly don’t. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 12:50 | False Start on Central Michigan, 5 yards · pre-snap | +3% AKR +1.9 pts |
| Q1 9:04 | Delay of Game on Akron, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% CMU +1.2 pts |
| Q1 1:36 | False Start on Akron, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% CMU +0.8 pts |
| Q1 0:40 | False Start on Central Michigan, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% AKR +0.7 pts |
| Q2 11:07 | Personal Foul on Central Michigan, 50 yards | +8% AKR +3.1 pts |
| Q2 2:14 | False Start on Central Michigan, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CMU 0.0 pts |
| Q2 0:30 | Roughing the Passer on Akron, 14 yards | +4% CMU +1.6 pts |
| Q2 0:11 | Intentional Grounding on Central Michigan, 64 yards | +16% AKR +4.6 pts |
| Q3 10:38 | Unsportsmanlike Conduct on Akron, 15 yards | 0% CMU +0.9 pts |
| Q3 8:23 | Personal Foul on Central Michigan, 15 yards | +4% AKR +1.6 pts |
| Q3 0:52 | False Start on Central Michigan, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% AKR +0.7 pts |
| Q4 13:03 | Face Mask on Akron, 15 yards | +1% CMU +1.6 pts |
| Q4 10:17 | Holding on Central Michigan, 10 yards | +1% AKR +0.6 pts |
| Q4 6:14 | False Start on Akron, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CMU +0.6 pts |
| Q4 3:19 | Illegal Substitution on Akron, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CMU +0.3 pts |
| Q4 1:57 | Illegal Substitution on Akron, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CMU +0.3 pts |
| Q4 0:56 | Delay of Game on Central Michigan, 5 yards · pre-snap | 0% CMU +0.2 pts |
When it happened
Akron’s chance of winning
As low as 24% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 12:50 | False Start on Central Michigan, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +3% AKR | AKR: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 5:00 | Akron converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 42% expected | +4% AKR | AKR: Missed field goal |
| 3 | Q1 3:15 | Akron converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 34% expected | +5% AKR | AKR: Missed field goal |
| 4 | Q2 11:07 | Personal Foul on Central Michigan, 50 yardsJudgment calls | +8% AKR | AKR: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q2 0:30 | Roughing the Passer on Akron, 14 yardsJudgment calls | +4% CMU | CMU: End of half |
| 6 | Q2 0:11 | Intentional Grounding on Central Michigan, 64 yardsJudgment calls | +16% AKR | AKR: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q3 13:43 | Akron converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 35% expected | +7% AKR | AKR: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q3 8:23 | Personal Foul on Central Michigan, 15 yardsJudgment calls | +4% AKR | AKR: Touchdown |
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Central Michigan 21% · Akron 79%
- Final margin
- Akron by 6
- Luck in points
- 1.2 for Akron
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Akron by 4.8
- Replay with same day's form
- Central Michigan 24% · Akron 76% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and expected points from CollegeFootballData.com via cfbfastR; win probability from our own model of the score, the possession and the betting line; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record. College play-by-play has no charting of drops or interception-worthy throws and no injury reports, so those kinds of luck aren’t counted here.
Methodology and validation · All Week 6 2025 games ·
Central Michigan ·
Akron
More from Week 6 2025
- Ohio at Ball State BALL 20–14 · replay 38% for the winner
- Eastern Michigan at Buffalo BUF 31–30 · replay 68% for the winner
- Miami (OH) at Northern Illinois M-OH 25–14 · replay 75% for the winner
- Western Michigan at Massachusetts WMU 21–3 · replay 94% for the winner
- Kent State at Oklahoma OU 44–0 · replay 99% for the winner
- Virginia at Louisville UVA 30–27 · replay 19% for the winner
- Oregon State at App State APP 27–23 · replay 20% for the winner
- Western Kentucky at Delaware WKU 27–24 · replay 23% for the winner
- UNLV at Wyoming UNLV 31–17 · replay 25% for the winner
- Florida Atlantic at Rice FAU 27–21 · replay 38% for the winner
- Colorado at TCU TCU 35–21 · replay 41% for the winner
- Texas Tech at Houston TTU 35–11 · replay 45% for the winner