Week 16 2024 · December 22, 2024
Lions at Bears, Week 16 2024: who deserved to win?
The Lions beat the Bears 34–17, and it was no fluke: replayed with the way both teams actually played, the Lions win 10 of 10. The Bears had the bounces: kicks alone were worth 1.7 points to the Bears.
Before kickoff the Lions were 70% favorites.
Final
| 34 | |
| 17 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +2 Lions about even · −2 Bears
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Lions win 10, Bears win 0.
- 1 DET 44 CHI 6
- 2 DET 38 CHI 7
- 3 DET 38 CHI 13
- 4 DET 41 CHI 19
- 5 DET 22 CHI 3
- 6 DET 31 CHI 16
- 7 DET 37 CHI 24
- 8 DET 17 CHI 7
- 9 DET 24 CHI 17
- 10 DET 16 CHI 13
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Lions win 98% of them, Bears 2%. The line is what actually happened: Lions by 17.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Lions by 17+ | 78.7% |
| Lions by 9–16 | 13.3% |
| Lions by 1–8 | 5.8% |
| Level after regulation | 0.3% |
| Bears by 1–8 | 1.7% |
| Bears by 9–16 | 0.2% |
| Bears by 17+ | 0.0% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Lions by 17. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Lions by 17.4.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- J. Bates, 30 yds made · 96% expected
- J. Bates, 34 yds made · 93% expected
- J. Bates, 65 yds missed · 46% expected
- C. Santos, 30 yds made · 96% expected
When it happened
Bears’ chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 55%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 14:08 | The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +3% DET | CHI: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 13:17 | Taunting on the Lions (Jameson Williams), 15 yardsJudgment calls · 3 flags in 1319 snaps before, position avg 1 per 409 | +4% CHI | CHI: Turnover |
| 3 | Q1 8:31 | The Bears fumbled and the Lions recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +7% DET | CHI: Turnover |
| 4 | Q1 7:02 | The Lions converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 34% expected | +6% DET | DET: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q1 3:41 | The Bears fumbled and the Lions recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +3% DET | CHI: Punt |
| 6 | Q1 0:06 | J. Bates made 34-yard field goalKicks · 93% expected for him | +3% DET | DET: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q2 9:18 | The Bears converted 4th & 33rd & 4th downs · 49% expected | +4% CHI | CHI: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q3 9:09 | The Bears converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 71% expected | +5% CHI | CHI: Field goal |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Kiran Amegadjie (CHI T), out · 0.3 pts
- Ryan Bates (CHI C), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
- Andrew Billings (CHI DT), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
- Carlton Davis (DET CB), out (IR) · 0.7 pts
- Graham Glasgow (DET G), out · 0.4 pts
- Alim McNeill (DET DT), out (IR) · 0.4 pts
- Alex Anzalone (DET LB), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
- Malcolm Rodriguez (DET LB), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Lions 100% · Bears 0%
- Final margin
- Lions by 17
- Luck in points
- 0.4 for the Bears
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Lions by 17.4
- Replay with same day's form
- Lions 98% · Bears 2% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 16 2024 games ·
Lions ·
Bears
More from Week 16 2024
- Broncos at Chargers LAC 34–27 · replay 74% for the winner
- Texans at Chiefs KC 27–19 · replay 87% for the winner
- Steelers at Ravens BAL 34–17 · replay 93% for the winner
- Cardinals at Panthers CAR 36–30 · replay 26% for the winner
- Browns at Bengals CIN 24–6 · replay 99% for the winner
- Rams at Jets LA 19–9 · replay 84% for the winner
- Giants at Falcons ATL 34–7 · replay 99% for the winner
- Eagles at Commanders WAS 36–33 · replay 58% for the winner
- Titans at Colts IND 38–30 · replay 88% for the winner
- Vikings at Seahawks MIN 27–24 · replay 61% for the winner
- Jaguars at Raiders LV 19–14 · replay 80% for the winner
- Patriots at Bills BUF 24–21 · replay 65% for the winner
- 49ers at Dolphins MIA 29–17 · replay 27% for the winner
- Buccaneers at Cowboys DAL 26–24 · replay 38% for the winner
- Saints at Packers GB 34–0 · replay 97% for the winner