Week 15 2019 · December 15, 2019
No FTN charting for this game (drops and interception-worthy throws are not modelled).
Bears at Packers, Week 15 2019: who deserved to win?
The Packers beat the Bears 21–13 and were the better team on the day: replayed with the same form, they win 8 of 10. The Bears had the bounces: fumble bounces alone were worth 1.6 points to the Bears.
Before kickoff the Packers were 62% favorites. The biggest swing (Q1, 4:53 left): the Packers converted 4th & 4, worth 12 points of win probability to the Packers.
Final
| 13 | |
| 21 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +22 Packers about even · −22 Bears
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Bears win 2, Packers win 8.
- 1 CHI 27 GB 13
- 2 CHI 31 GB 27
- 3 CHI 28 GB 30
- 4 CHI 26 GB 31
- 5 CHI 23 GB 30
- 6 CHI 10 GB 20
- 7 CHI 9 GB 23
- 8 CHI 6 GB 24
- 9 CHI 6 GB 28
- 10 CHI 10 GB 40
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Bears win 22% of them, Packers 78%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Packers by 8.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Bears by 17+ | 2.1% |
| Bears by 9–16 | 6.6% |
| Bears by 1–8 | 11.7% |
| Level after regulation | 2.0% |
| Packers by 1–8 | 26.3% |
| Packers by 9–16 | 20.4% |
| Packers by 17+ | 30.9% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Packers by 8. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Packers by 9.0.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- E. Pineiro, 30 yds made · 95% expected
- E. Pineiro, 27 yds made · 96% expected
When it happened
Packers’ chance of winning
Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 10:33 | The Packers converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 36% expected | +4% GB | GB: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 7:04 | Kick Catch Interference on the Bears (Cordarrelle Patterson), 15 yardsJudgment calls · 2 flags in 333 snaps before, position avg 1 per 331 | +4% GB | GB: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q1 4:53 | The Packers converted 4th & 43rd & 4th downs · 44% expected | +12% GB | GB: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q2 5:09 | The Packers were stopped on 4th & 63rd & 4th downs · 35% expected | +4% CHI | GB: Turnover on downs |
| 5 | Q2 1:51 | The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 34% expected | +5% GB | CHI: Field goal |
| 6 | Q2 0:16 | The Packers were stopped on 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 44% expectedIntentional Grounding on the Packers (Aaron Rodgers), 10 yardsJudgment calls · 1 flag in 833 snaps before, position avg 1 per 751 | +10% CHI | GB: Turnover on downs |
| 7 | Q3 10:23 | The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 42% expected | +5% GB | CHI: Turnover on downs |
| 8 | Q3 8:58 | The Packers converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 44% expected | +4% GB | GB: Touchdown |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Bobby Massie (CHI T), out · 0.8 pts
- Roquan Smith (CHI LB), out (IR) · 0.7 pts
- Taylor Gabriel (CHI WR), out · 0.5 pts
- Danny Trevathan (CHI LB), out · 0.4 pts
- Trey Burton (CHI TE), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
- Roy Robertson-Harris (CHI DT), out · 0.2 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Bears 1% · Packers 99%
- Final margin
- Packers by 8
- Luck in points
- 1.0 for the Bears
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Packers by 9.0
- Replay with same day's form
- Bears 22% · Packers 78% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting (not available for this game); injuries from snap counts and injury reports. No FTN charting for this game (drops and interception-worthy throws are not modelled).
Methodology and validation · All Week 15 2019 games ·
Bears ·
Packers
More from Week 15 2019
- Jets at Ravens BAL 42–21 · replay 98% for the winner
- Broncos at Chiefs KC 23–3 · replay 98% for the winner
- Texans at Titans HOU 24–21 · replay 70% for the winner
- Dolphins at Giants NYG 36–20 · replay 93% for the winner
- Patriots at Bengals NE 34–13 · replay 38% for the winner
- Eagles at Washington PHI 37–27 · replay 28% for the winner
- Seahawks at Panthers SEA 30–24 · replay 79% for the winner
- Buccaneers at Lions TB 38–17 · replay 96% for the winner
- Browns at Cardinals ARI 38–24 · replay 86% for the winner
- Jaguars at Raiders JAX 20–16 · replay 25% for the winner
- Vikings at Chargers MIN 39–10 · replay 74% for the winner
- Falcons at 49ers ATL 29–22 · replay 67% for the winner
- Rams at Cowboys DAL 44–21 · replay 92% for the winner
- Bills at Steelers BUF 17–10 · replay 73% for the winner
- Colts at Saints NO 34–7 · replay 92% for the winner