luckadjusted

Week 15 2019 · December 15, 2019

No FTN charting for this game (drops and interception-worthy throws are not modelled).

Browns at Cardinals, Week 15 2019: who deserved to win?

The Cardinals beat the Browns 38–24, and it was no fluke: replayed with the way both teams actually played, the Cardinals win 9 of 10.

An off day for the Browns: their defense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against the Cardinals they would win 52% of the time; with this day’s form, 14%. The numbers

Before kickoff the Browns were 59% favorites. The biggest swing (Q1, 4:59 left): the Browns converted 3rd & 9, worth 8 points of win probability to the Browns.

Final

Cleveland Browns 24
Arizona Cardinals 38

December 15, 2019 · State Farm Stadium · Closing line: Browns −3

Luck index +14 Cardinals about even · −14 Browns

Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works

Ten replays. Browns win 1, Cardinals win 9.

  1. 1 CLE 28 ARI 21
  2. 2 CLE 17 ARI 19
  3. 3 CLE 16 ARI 20
  4. 4 CLE 23 ARI 30
  5. 5 CLE 7 ARI 16
  6. 6 CLE 17 ARI 28
  7. 7 CLE 21 ARI 35
  8. 8 CLE 6 ARI 24
  9. 9 CLE 10 ARI 33
  10. 10 CLE 7 ARI 38

Three other ways to ask

Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.

The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.

The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.

Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.

An off day for the Browns

Their defense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against the Cardinals they would win 52% of the time; with this day’s form, 14%.

38 points apart for the Browns: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.

UnitThis gameUsual levelBetter or worse than usual
Browns offenseEPA per play gained +0.22 +0.10 better by 0.12
Browns defenseEPA per play allowed +0.44 +0.10 worse by 0.34
Cardinals offenseEPA per play gained +0.44 +0.04 better by 0.40
Cardinals defenseEPA per play allowed +0.22 +0.17 worse by 0.05

EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.

How 4,000 replays ended

Browns win 14% of them, Cardinals 86%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Cardinals by 14.

Show as a table
Final margin in the replaysShare of replays
Browns by 17+1.1%
Browns by 9–163.3%
Browns by 1–89.4%
Level after regulation1.7%
Cardinals by 1–819.7%
Cardinals by 9–1624.8%
Cardinals by 17+40.0%

Where the luck was

Take the luck out

The final margin was Cardinals by 14. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Cardinals by 8.3.

Each row takes one kind of luck out of the margin. Color shows which team it helped. Luck shares are the fitted ones (how much of each component is luck).

The kicks

How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.

  • A. Seibert, 44 yds made · 84% expected
  • A. Seibert, 45 yds missed · 81% expected
  • Z. Gonzalez, 21 yds made · 99% expected
Bar: expected chance of a make. Filled dot: made. Open dot: missed or blocked.

When it happened

Cardinals’ chance of winning

Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.

nflfastR’s in-game win probability. It ignores the betting line, so it starts near even. Shaded above the middle while the Cardinals were ahead in it, below while the Browns were.
#WhenWhat happenedWin probability forNext drive
1 Q1 12:02 The Cardinals converted 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 38% expected +7% ARI ARI: Touchdown
2 Q1 4:59 The Browns converted 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 28% expected +8% CLE CLE: Turnover
3 Q2 13:23 The Cardinals converted 3rd & 143rd & 4th downs · 22% expected +7% ARI ARI: Touchdown
4 Q2 5:23 The Browns were stopped on 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 59% expected +5% ARI CLE: Field goal
5 Q2 2:12 The Cardinals converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 74% expected +6% ARI ARI: Touchdown
6 Q3 4:58 The Browns were stopped on 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 33% expected +4% ARI CLE: Punt
7 Q4 12:55 The Browns were stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 40% expected +4% ARI CLE: Missed field goal
8 Q4 12:09 A. Seibert missed 45-yard field goalKicks · 81% expected for him, 4 of 7 from 45+ before +4% ARI CLE: Turnover

Missing players

Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.

  • Rodney Gunter (ARI DE), out (IR) · 0.4 pts
  • Jonathan Bullard (ARI DE), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
  • Olivier Vernon (CLE DE), out · 0.9 pts
  • Morgan Burnett (CLE SS), out (IR) · 0.4 pts
  • Eric Murray (CLE FS), out · 0.2 pts

Adjust the assumptions

Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.

Only coin-flips re-rolled

Browns 3% · Cardinals 97%

Final margin
Cardinals by 14
Luck in points
5.7 for the Cardinals
Luck-adjusted margin
Cardinals by 8.3
Replay with same day's form
Browns 14% · Cardinals 86% unchanged: why
How much of each is luck?

0% treats it as skill, 100% as pure luck. The tick is our fit.

What counts

We tested momentum on 19,000 lucky breaks and found none, so it's off by default. Why

Flip a play

Force the other outcome, in this game and in every replay: a made kick becomes a miss, a stop becomes a conversion, a flag goes the other way.

About these numbers

Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting (not available for this game); injuries from snap counts and injury reports. No FTN charting for this game (drops and interception-worthy throws are not modelled).

Methodology and validation · All Week 15 2019 games · Browns · Cardinals

More from Week 15 2019