Week 16 2019 · December 23, 2019
No FTN charting for this game (drops and interception-worthy throws are not modelled).
Packers at Vikings, Week 16 2019: who deserved to win?
The Packers beat the Vikings 23–10 and were the better team on the day: replayed with the same form, they win 8 of 10.
Before kickoff the Vikings were 62% favorites. The biggest swing (Q1, 14:13 left): the Packers were stopped on 3rd & 5, worth 19 points of win probability to the Vikings.
Final
| 23 | |
| 10 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +25 Packers about even · −25 Vikings
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Packers win 8, Vikings win 2.
- 1 GB 34 MIN 3
- 2 GB 30 MIN 7
- 3 GB 42 MIN 23
- 4 GB 28 MIN 13
- 5 GB 41 MIN 30
- 6 GB 38 MIN 29
- 7 GB 30 MIN 24
- 8 GB 15 MIN 13
- 9 GB 26 MIN 29
- 10 GB 20 MIN 33
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Packers win 75% of them, Vikings 25%, counting the 4% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Packers by 13.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Packers by 17+ | 29.5% |
| Packers by 9–16 | 19.7% |
| Packers by 1–8 | 22.8% |
| Level after regulation | 3.6% |
| Vikings by 1–8 | 13.2% |
| Vikings by 9–16 | 7.3% |
| Vikings by 17+ | 3.9% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Packers by 13. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Packers by 5.9.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- D. Bailey, 23 yds made · 99% expected
- M. Crosby, 42 yds made · 87% expected
- M. Crosby, 33 yds made · 96% expected
- M. Crosby, 19 yds made · 100% expected
- Extra point missed · 95% expected
When it happened
Vikings’ chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 79%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 14:13 | The Packers were stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 39% expectedThe Packers fumbled and the Vikings recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +19% MIN | GB: Punt |
| 2 | Q2 2:42 | The Vikings were stopped on 4th & 43rd & 4th downs · 41% expected | +8% GB | MIN: Punt |
| 3 | Q2 0:52 | The Packers fumbled and recovered it themselvesFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +8% GB | GB: Field goal |
| 4 | Q2 0:03 | M. Crosby made 19-yard field goalKicks · 100% expected for him | +17% MIN | GB: Punt |
| 5 | Q3 13:44 | The Packers fumbled and recovered it themselvesFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +9% GB | GB: Punt |
| 6 | Q3 9:02 | The Vikings converted 3rd & 183rd & 4th downs · 16% expected | +10% MIN | MIN: Turnover |
| 7 | Q4 15:00 | The Vikings were stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 47% expected | +8% GB | MIN: Punt |
| 8 | Q4 4:16 | Offensive Holding on the Vikings, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +14% GB | GB: Punt |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Dalvin Cook (MIN RB), out · 0.4 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Packers 75% · Vikings 25%
- Final margin
- Packers by 13
- Luck in points
- 7.1 for the Packers
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Packers by 5.9
- Replay with same day's form
- Packers 75% · Vikings 25% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting (not available for this game); injuries from snap counts and injury reports. No FTN charting for this game (drops and interception-worthy throws are not modelled).
Methodology and validation · All Week 16 2019 games ·
Packers ·
Vikings
More from Week 16 2019
- Texans at Buccaneers HOU 23–20 · replay 8% for the winner
- Bills at Patriots NE 24–17 · replay 78% for the winner
- Rams at 49ers SF 34–31 · replay 57% for the winner
- Ravens at Browns BAL 31–15 · replay 88% for the winner
- Panthers at Colts IND 38–6 · replay 93% for the winner
- Bengals at Dolphins MIA 38–35 · replay 78% for the winner
- Jaguars at Falcons ATL 24–12 · replay 95% for the winner
- Saints at Titans NO 38–28 · replay 72% for the winner
- Giants at Washington NYG 41–35 · replay 84% for the winner
- Steelers at Jets NYJ 16–10 · replay 51% for the winner
- Lions at Broncos DEN 27–17 · replay 76% for the winner
- Raiders at Chargers OAK 24–17 · replay 42% for the winner
- Cardinals at Seahawks ARI 27–13 · replay 93% for the winner
- Cowboys at Eagles PHI 17–9 · replay 55% for the winner
- Chiefs at Bears KC 26–3 · replay 96% for the winner