Week 17 2019 · December 29, 2019
No FTN charting for this game (drops and interception-worthy throws are not modelled).
Packers at Lions, Week 17 2019: who deserved to win?
The Packers beat the Lions 23–20, but it was a coin flip: replayed with the way both teams played, the Packers win 4 of 10. Luck ran their way: injuries alone were worth 3.4 points to the Packers.
The Packers won on an off day: they played far below what the matchup promised. In a fresh game against the Lions they would win 83% of the time; with this day’s form, 43%. The numbers
Before kickoff the Packers were 84% favorites. The biggest swing (Q4, 5:24 left): the Packers converted 3rd & 10, worth 23 points of win probability to the Packers.
Final
| 23 | |
| 20 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +57 Packers lucky · −57 Lions
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Packers win 4, Lions win 6.
- 1 GB 33 DET 13
- 2 GB 20 DET 10
- 3 GB 30 DET 25
- 4 GB 37 DET 35
- 5 GB 17 DET 20
- 6 GB 19 DET 24
- 7 GB 23 DET 31
- 8 GB 20 DET 33
- 9 GB 13 DET 30
- 10 GB 10 DET 34
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
The Packers won on an off day
They played far below what the matchup promised. In a fresh game against the Lions they would win 83% of the time; with this day’s form, 43%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
40 points apart for the Packers: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packers offenseEPA per play gained | +0.09 | +0.13 | worse by 0.04 |
| Packers defenseEPA per play allowed | −0.05 | +0.10 | better by 0.15 |
| Lions offenseEPA per play gained | −0.05 | +0.08 | worse by 0.14 |
| Lions defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.09 | +0.14 | better by 0.06 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
Packers win 43% of them, Lions 57%, counting the 3% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Packers by 3.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Packers by 17+ | 8.8% |
| Packers by 9–16 | 12.3% |
| Packers by 1–8 | 19.4% |
| Level after regulation | 2.8% |
| Lions by 1–8 | 25.7% |
| Lions by 9–16 | 16.0% |
| Lions by 17+ | 15.0% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Packers by 3. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Packers by 1.7.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- M. Crosby, 32 yds made · 96% expected
- M. Prater, 42 yds made · 86% expected
- M. Crosby, 51 yds missed · 74% expected
- M. Crosby, 40 yds made · 89% expected
- M. Prater, 56 yds made · 65% expected
- M. Crosby, 33 yds made · 95% expected
When it happened
Lions’ chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 94%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q3 3:16 | The Packers converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +8% GB | GB: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q4 6:40 | The Packers were stopped on 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 73% expected | +11% DET | GB: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q4 5:24 | The Packers converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +23% GB | GB: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q4 2:44 | The Packers converted 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 29% expected | +17% GB | GB: Turnover |
| 5 | Q4 1:49 | The Packers were stopped on 3rd & 203rd & 4th downs · 17% expected | +10% DET | GB: Field goal |
| 6 | Q4 1:32 | The Lions were stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 40% expected | +8% GB | DET: Punt |
| 7 | Q4 1:20 | Unnecessary Roughness on the Lions (Tavon Wilson), 15 yardsJudgment calls · 0 flags in 868 snaps before, position avg 1 per 441 | +8% GB | GB: Field goal |
| 8 | Q4 0:03 | M. Crosby made 33-yard field goalKicks · 95% expected for him | +20% GB | – |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Marvin Jones (DET WR), out (IR) · 0.8 pts
- T.J. Hockenson (DET TE), out (IR) · 0.7 pts
- Jeff Driskel (DET QB), out (IR), replaced by d.blough · 0.5 pts
- Jarrad Davis (DET LB), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
- Jahlani Tavai (DET LB), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
- A'Shawn Robinson (DET DT), out · 0.2 pts
- Christian Jones (DET LB), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
- Da'Shawn Hand (DET DE), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
- Joe Dahl (DET G), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Packers 75% · Lions 25%
- Final margin
- Packers by 3
- Luck in points
- 1.3 for the Packers
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Packers by 1.7
- Replay with same day's form
- Packers 43% · Lions 57% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting (not available for this game); injuries from snap counts and injury reports. No FTN charting for this game (drops and interception-worthy throws are not modelled).
Methodology and validation · All Week 17 2019 games ·
Packers ·
Lions
More from Week 17 2019
- Falcons at Buccaneers ATL 28–22 · replay 14% for the winner
- Bears at Vikings CHI 21–19 · replay 9% for the winner
- Browns at Bengals CIN 33–23 · replay 49% for the winner
- Chargers at Chiefs KC 31–21 · replay 80% for the winner
- Dolphins at Patriots MIA 27–24 · replay 43% for the winner
- Saints at Panthers NO 42–10 · replay 95% for the winner
- Jets at Bills NYJ 13–6 · replay 38% for the winner
- Cardinals at Rams LA 31–24 · replay 62% for the winner
- Colts at Jaguars JAX 38–20 · replay 59% for the winner
- Raiders at Broncos DEN 16–15 · replay 13% for the winner
- Eagles at Giants PHI 34–17 · replay 66% for the winner
- Steelers at Ravens BAL 28–10 · replay 96% for the winner
- Titans at Texans TEN 35–14 · replay 87% for the winner
- Washington at Cowboys DAL 47–16 · replay 96% for the winner
- 49ers at Seahawks SF 26–21 · replay 72% for the winner