luckadjusted

Week 13 2022 · December 4, 2022

Packers at Bears, Week 13 2022: who deserved to win?

The Packers beat the Bears 28–19 and were the better team on the day: replayed with the same form, they win 7 of 10. The Bears had the bounces: drops alone were worth 1.6 points to the Bears.

Before kickoff the Packers were 62% favorites. The biggest swing (Q4, 11:44 left): C. Santos had a 40-yard field goal blocked, worth 15 points of win probability to the Packers.

Final

Green Bay Packers 28
Chicago Bears 19

December 4, 2022 · Soldier Field · Closing line: Packers −4

Luck index +28 Packers lucky · −28 Bears

Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works

Ten replays. Packers win 7, Bears win 3.

  1. 1 GB 55 CHI 28
  2. 2 GB 27 CHI 8
  3. 3 GB 28 CHI 14
  4. 4 GB 34 CHI 23
  5. 5 GB 21 CHI 14
  6. 6 GB 24 CHI 20
  7. 7 GB 29 CHI 27
  8. 8 GB 20 CHI 23
  9. 9 GB 16 CHI 24
  10. 10 GB 20 CHI 38

Three other ways to ask

Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.

The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.

The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.

Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.

How 4,000 replays ended

Packers win 72% of them, Bears 28%, counting the 4% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Packers by 9.

Show as a table
Final margin in the replaysShare of replays
Packers by 17+22.8%
Packers by 9–1621.6%
Packers by 1–825.6%
Level after regulation3.8%
Bears by 1–815.0%
Bears by 9–167.8%
Bears by 17+3.4%

Where the luck was

Take the luck out

The final margin was Packers by 9. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Packers by 1.1.

Each row takes one kind of luck out of the margin. Color shows which team it helped. Luck shares are the fitted ones (how much of each component is luck).

The kicks

How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.

  • C. Santos, 40 yds made · 83% expected
  • M. Crosby, 24 yds made · 97% expected
  • C. Santos, 28 yds made · 96% expected
  • C. Santos, 40 yds blocked · 83% expected
  • M. Crosby, 32 yds made · 93% expected
  • Extra point missed · 93% expected
Bar: expected chance of a make. Filled dot: made. Open dot: missed or blocked.

When it happened

Bears’ chance of winning

As low as 0% and as high as 89%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.

nflfastR’s in-game win probability. It ignores the betting line, so it starts near even. Shaded above the middle while the Bears were ahead in it, below while the Packers were.
#WhenWhat happenedWin probability forNext drive
1 Q2 10:25 M. Crosby made 24-yard field goalKicks · 97% expected for him +8% GB GB: Turnover on downs
2 Q2 0:23 The Packers converted 4th & 43rd & 4th downs · 46% expected +13% GB GB: Touchdown
3 Q4 15:00 Defensive Pass Interference on the Bears, 38 yardsJudgment calls +7% GB GB: Touchdown
4 Q4 11:44 C. Santos had a 40-yard field goal blockedKicks · 83% expected for him +15% GB CHI: Turnover
5 Q4 6:23 The Packers converted 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 53% expected +7% GB GB: Field goal
6 Q4 4:57 The Packers were stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 42% expected +7% CHI GB: Field goal
7 Q4 2:57 The Bears threw an interception-worthy pass, and it was pickedInterceptions · 45% expected to stay out of the defense's hands +14% GB CHI: Turnover
8 Q4 0:51 The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 74% expectedThe Bears threw an interception-worthy pass, and it was pickedInterceptions · 46% expected to stay out of the defense's hands +9% GB –

Missing players

Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.

  • Trevor Siemian (CHI QB), out (IR), replaced by j.fields · 0.9 pts
  • Darnell Mooney (CHI WR), out (IR) · 0.8 pts
  • Eddie Jackson (CHI SS), out (IR) · 0.8 pts
  • Kyler Gordon (CHI CB), out · 0.7 pts
  • Larry Borom (CHI T), out · 0.5 pts
  • Jaquan Brisker (CHI SS), out · 0.4 pts
  • Kindle Vildor (CHI CB), out · 0.3 pts
  • Lucas Patrick (CHI G), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
  • David Bakhtiari (GB T), out · 1.4 pts
  • Romeo Doubs (GB WR), out · 0.8 pts
  • Eric Stokes (GB CB), out (IR) · 0.5 pts
  • Rashan Gary (GB LB), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
  • Krys Barnes (GB LB), out · 0.2 pts

Adjust the assumptions

Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.

Only coin-flips re-rolled

Packers 67% · Bears 33%

Final margin
Packers by 9
Luck in points
7.9 for the Packers
Luck-adjusted margin
Packers by 1.1
Replay with same day's form
Packers 72% · Bears 28% unchanged: why
How much of each is luck?

0% treats it as skill, 100% as pure luck. The tick is our fit.

What counts

We tested momentum on 19,000 lucky breaks and found none, so it's off by default. Why

Flip a play

Force the other outcome, in this game and in every replay: a made kick becomes a miss, a stop becomes a conversion, a flag goes the other way.

About these numbers

Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.

Methodology and validation · All Week 13 2022 games · Packers · Bears

More from Week 13 2022