Week 17 2022 · January 1, 2023
Bears at Lions, Week 17 2022: who deserved to win?
The Lions beat the Bears 41–10, and it was no fluke: replayed with the way both teams actually played, the Lions win 10 of 10.
An off day for the Bears: their defense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against the Lions they would win 33% of the time; with this day’s form, 1%. The numbers
Before kickoff the Lions were 63% favorites. The biggest swing (Q1, 5:21 left): the Bears converted 3rd & 4, worth 18 points of win probability to the Bears.
Final
| 10 | |
| 41 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +1 Lions about even · −1 Bears
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Bears win 0, Lions win 10.
- 1 CHI 26 DET 31
- 2 CHI 10 DET 20
- 3 CHI 20 DET 34
- 4 CHI 13 DET 30
- 5 CHI 10 DET 30
- 6 CHI 20 DET 43
- 7 CHI 12 DET 38
- 8 CHI 13 DET 44
- 9 CHI 6 DET 41
- 10 CHI 0 DET 43
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
An off day for the Bears
Their defense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against the Lions they would win 33% of the time; with this day’s form, 1%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
32 points apart for the Bears: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bears offenseEPA per play gained | +0.17 | +0.07 | better by 0.10 |
| Bears defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.34 | +0.17 | worse by 0.18 |
| Lions offenseEPA per play gained | +0.34 | +0.10 | better by 0.24 |
| Lions defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.17 | +0.18 | better by 0.01 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
Bears win 1% of them, Lions 99%. The line is what actually happened: Lions by 31.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Bears by 17+ | 0.0% |
| Bears by 9–16 | 0.1% |
| Bears by 1–8 | 0.4% |
| Level after regulation | 0.1% |
| Lions by 1–8 | 1.8% |
| Lions by 9–16 | 8.0% |
| Lions by 17+ | 89.5% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Lions by 31. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Lions by 19.8.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- C. Santos, 23 yds made · 99% expected
- M. Badgley, 23 yds made · 97% expected
- M. Badgley, 41 yds made · 86% expected
When it happened
Lions’ chance of winning
As low as 37% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 12:26 | The Bears converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 72% expected | +9% CHI | CHI: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q1 11:00 | The Bears converted 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 58% expected | +6% CHI | CHI: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q1 9:35 | The Lions converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 48% expected | +5% DET | DET: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q1 7:38 | Defensive Pass Interference on the Bears, 34 yardsJudgment calls | +14% DET | DET: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q1 5:21 | The Bears converted 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 43% expected | +18% CHI | CHI: Field goal |
| 6 | Q1 3:06 | The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 50% expected | +7% DET | CHI: Field goal |
| 7 | Q1 2:28 | C. Santos made 23-yard field goalKicks · 99% expected for him | +5% DET | CHI: Punt |
| 8 | Q2 9:47 | The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 35% expected | +8% DET | CHI: Punt |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- DeShon Elliott (DET FS), out · 0.4 pts
- Jaylon Johnson (CHI CB), out (IR) · 0.9 pts
- Trevor Siemian (CHI QB), out (IR), replaced by j.fields · 0.9 pts
- Darnell Mooney (CHI WR), out (IR) · 0.8 pts
- Eddie Jackson (CHI SS), out (IR) · 0.8 pts
- Jack Sanborn (CHI LB), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
- Kindle Vildor (CHI CB), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Bears 0% · Lions 100%
- Final margin
- Lions by 31
- Luck in points
- 11.2 for the Lions
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Lions by 19.8
- Replay with same day's form
- Bears 1% · Lions 99% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 17 2022 games ·
Bears ·
Lions
More from Week 17 2022
- Cowboys at Titans DAL 27–13 · replay 96% for the winner
- Cardinals at Falcons ATL 20–19 · replay 58% for the winner
- Panthers at Buccaneers TB 30–24 · replay 74% for the winner
- Browns at Commanders CLE 24–10 · replay 90% for the winner
- Broncos at Chiefs KC 27–24 · replay 97% for the winner
- Colts at Giants NYG 38–10 · replay 89% for the winner
- Jaguars at Texans JAX 31–3 · replay 83% for the winner
- Dolphins at Patriots NE 23–21 · replay 41% for the winner
- Saints at Eagles NO 20–10 · replay 89% for the winner
- Jets at Seahawks SEA 23–6 · replay 91% for the winner
- 49ers at Raiders SF 37–34 · replay 52% for the winner
- Rams at Chargers LAC 31–10 · replay 87% for the winner
- Vikings at Packers GB 41–17 · replay 81% for the winner
- Steelers at Ravens PIT 16–13 · replay 82% for the winner