luckadjusted

Week 7 2019 · October 20, 2019

No FTN charting for this game (drops and interception-worthy throws are not modelled).

Raiders at Packers, Week 7 2019: who deserved to win?

The Packers beat the Raiders 42–24, but the Raiders played well enough to win it: they take 6 of 10 replays with the same day's form. Luck ran their way: judgment calls alone were worth 11.6 points to the Packers.

The Packers won on an off day: their defense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against the Raiders they would win 70% of the time; with this day’s form, 38%. The numbers

Before kickoff the Packers were 66% favorites. The biggest swing (Q2, 14:26 left): Offensive Holding on the Raiders, 10 yards, wiping out the play, worth 16 points of win probability to the Packers.

Final

Oakland Raiders 24
Green Bay Packers 42

October 20, 2019 · Lambeau Field · Closing line: Packers −5.5

Luck index +62 Packers very lucky · −62 Raiders

Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works

Ten replays. Raiders win 6, Packers win 4.

  1. 1 OAK 44 GB 17
  2. 2 OAK 51 GB 34
  3. 3 OAK 45 GB 33
  4. 4 OAK 25 GB 16
  5. 5 OAK 30 GB 24
  6. 6 OAK 17 GB 14
  7. 7 OAK 32 GB 34
  8. 8 OAK 22 GB 27
  9. 9 OAK 17 GB 27
  10. 10 OAK 21 GB 41

Three other ways to ask

Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.

The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.

The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.

Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.

The Packers won on an off day

Their defense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against the Raiders they would win 70% of the time; with this day’s form, 38%.

32 points apart for the Packers: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.

UnitThis gameUsual levelBetter or worse than usual
Raiders offenseEPA per play gained +0.53 +0.13 better by 0.39
Raiders defenseEPA per play allowed +0.62 +0.17 worse by 0.45
Packers offenseEPA per play gained +0.62 +0.12 better by 0.50
Packers defenseEPA per play allowed +0.53 +0.12 worse by 0.40

EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.

How 4,000 replays ended

Raiders win 62% of them, Packers 38%, counting the 3% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Packers by 18.

Show as a table
Final margin in the replaysShare of replays
Raiders by 17+15.5%
Raiders by 9–1616.9%
Raiders by 1–827.2%
Level after regulation2.9%
Packers by 1–819.2%
Packers by 9–1612.0%
Packers by 17+6.3%

Where the luck was

Take the luck out

The final margin was Packers by 18. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Packers by 7.6.

Each row takes one kind of luck out of the margin. Color shows which team it helped. Luck shares are the fitted ones (how much of each component is luck).

When it happened

Packers’ chance of winning

As low as 45% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.

nflfastR’s in-game win probability. It ignores the betting line, so it starts near even. Shaded above the middle while the Packers were ahead in it, below while the Raiders were.
#WhenWhat happenedWin probability forNext drive
1 Q1 10:20 The Packers converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 36% expected +12% GB GB: Touchdown
2 Q1 9:42 Offensive Pass Interference on the Raiders (Trevor Davis), 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls · 1 flag in 168 snaps before, position avg 1 per 331 +8% GB GB: Punt
3 Q1 2:03 Offensive Holding on the Raiders, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls +6% GB GB: Touchdown
4 Q1 0:13 The Raiders converted 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 27% expected +14% OAK OAK: Touchdown
5 Q2 14:26 Offensive Holding on the Raiders, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls +16% GB GB: Touchdown
6 Q2 11:38 The Raiders converted 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 45% expected +8% OAK OAK: Touchdown
7 Q2 9:26 Offensive Pass Interference on the Packers (Jake Kumerow), 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls · 0 flags in 160 snaps before, position avg 1 per 331 +8% OAK OAK: Turnover
8 Q2 8:04 The Packers converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 34% expected +10% GB GB: Touchdown

Missing players

Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.

  • Davante Adams (GB WR), out · 1.4 pts
  • Lane Taylor (GB G), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
  • Raven Greene (GB FS), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
  • Tyrell Williams (OAK WR), out · 0.7 pts
  • Trent Brown (OAK T), out · 0.5 pts
  • Jordan Devey (OAK C), out (IR) · 0.4 pts

Adjust the assumptions

Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.

Only coin-flips re-rolled

Raiders 23% · Packers 77%

Final margin
Packers by 18
Luck in points
10.4 for the Packers
Luck-adjusted margin
Packers by 7.6
Replay with same day's form
Raiders 62% · Packers 38% unchanged: why
How much of each is luck?

0% treats it as skill, 100% as pure luck. The tick is our fit.

What counts

We tested momentum on 19,000 lucky breaks and found none, so it's off by default. Why

Flip a play

Force the other outcome, in this game and in every replay: a made kick becomes a miss, a stop becomes a conversion, a flag goes the other way.

About these numbers

Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting (not available for this game); injuries from snap counts and injury reports. No FTN charting for this game (drops and interception-worthy throws are not modelled).

Methodology and validation · All Week 7 2019 games · Raiders · Packers

More from Week 7 2019