Week 7 2019 · October 20, 2019
No FTN charting for this game (drops and interception-worthy throws are not modelled).
Chargers at Titans, Week 7 2019: who deserved to win?
The Titans stole one. They beat the Chargers 23–20, but replayed with the way both teams actually played, the Chargers win 8 of 10. Luck ran their way: fumble bounces alone were worth 3.1 points to the Titans.
The Titans won on an off day: they played far below what the matchup promised. In a fresh game against the Chargers they would win 60% of the time; with this day’s form, 20%. The numbers
Before kickoff the Titans were 59% favorites. The biggest swing (Q4, 0:19 left): the Chargers fumbled and the Titans recovered, worth 26 points of win probability to the Titans.
Final
| 20 | |
| 23 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +80 Titans very lucky · −80 Chargers
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Chargers win 8, Titans win 2.
- 1 LAC 34 TEN 7
- 2 LAC 23 TEN 3
- 3 LAC 20 TEN 3
- 4 LAC 30 TEN 16
- 5 LAC 21 TEN 10
- 6 LAC 24 TEN 16
- 7 LAC 19 TEN 14
- 8 LAC 19 TEN 17
- 9 LAC 21 TEN 24
- 10 LAC 16 TEN 27
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
The Titans won on an off day
They played far below what the matchup promised. In a fresh game against the Chargers they would win 60% of the time; with this day’s form, 20%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
40 points apart for the Titans: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chargers offenseEPA per play gained | +0.13 | +0.15 | worse by 0.02 |
| Chargers defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.27 | +0.14 | worse by 0.14 |
| Titans offenseEPA per play gained | +0.27 | +0.04 | better by 0.23 |
| Titans defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.13 | +0.07 | worse by 0.07 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
Chargers win 80% of them, Titans 20%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Titans by 3.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Chargers by 17+ | 31.1% |
| Chargers by 9–16 | 20.9% |
| Chargers by 1–8 | 27.1% |
| Level after regulation | 2.5% |
| Titans by 1–8 | 11.5% |
| Titans by 9–16 | 5.3% |
| Titans by 17+ | 1.8% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Titans by 3. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Titans by 2.5.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- C. Parkey, 45 yds made · 82% expected
- C. McLaughlin, 29 yds made · 97% expected
- C. McLaughlin, 50 yds made · 73% expected
- Extra point missed · 93% expected
When it happened
Titans’ chance of winning
As low as 33% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 8:18 | The Titans converted 4th & 83rd & 4th downs · 30% expected | +11% TEN | TEN: Field goal |
| 2 | Q1 1:34 | The Chargers converted 3rd & 153rd & 4th downs · 22% expected | +9% LAC | LAC: Field goal |
| 3 | Q3 13:21 | The Titans converted 3rd & 143rd & 4th downs · 21% expected | +11% TEN | TEN: Punt |
| 4 | Q3 6:28 | Defensive Holding on the Titans (Adoree' Jackson), 5 yardsJudgment calls · 1 flag in 302 snaps before, position avg 1 per 199 | +8% LAC | LAC: Punt |
| 5 | Q4 14:55 | The Titans converted 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 25% expected | +10% TEN | TEN: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q4 13:16 | The Titans converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 32% expected | +16% TEN | TEN: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q4 2:39 | The Titans were stopped on 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 73% expected | +14% LAC | TEN: End of game |
| 8 | Q4 0:19 | The Chargers fumbled and the Titans recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +26% TEN | – |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Jayon Brown (TEN LB), out · 0.4 pts
- Ryan Succop (TEN K), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
- Sharif Finch (TEN LB), out · 0.2 pts
- Melvin Ingram (LAC DE), out · 0.8 pts
- Derwin James (LAC FS), out (IR) · 0.7 pts
- Mike Pouncey (LAC C), out (IR) · 0.7 pts
- Adrian Phillips (LAC SS), out (IR) · 0.4 pts
- Justin Jones (LAC DT), out · 0.3 pts
- Travis Benjamin (LAC WR), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
- Brandon Mebane (LAC NT), out · 0.2 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Chargers 20% · Titans 80%
- Final margin
- Titans by 3
- Luck in points
- 0.5 for the Titans
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Titans by 2.5
- Replay with same day's form
- Chargers 80% · Titans 20% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting (not available for this game); injuries from snap counts and injury reports. No FTN charting for this game (drops and interception-worthy throws are not modelled).
Methodology and validation · All Week 7 2019 games ·
Chargers ·
Titans
More from Week 7 2019
- Chiefs at Broncos KC 30–6 · replay 98% for the winner
- Cardinals at Giants ARI 27–21 · replay 87% for the winner
- Texans at Colts IND 30–23 · replay 12% for the winner
- Jaguars at Bengals JAX 27–17 · replay 79% for the winner
- Rams at Falcons LA 37–10 · replay 80% for the winner
- Dolphins at Bills BUF 31–21 · replay 84% for the winner
- Vikings at Lions MIN 42–30 · replay 84% for the winner
- Raiders at Packers GB 42–24 · replay 38% for the winner
- 49ers at Washington SF 9–0 · replay 84% for the winner
- Ravens at Seahawks BAL 30–16 · replay 64% for the winner
- Saints at Bears NO 36–25 · replay 99% for the winner
- Eagles at Cowboys DAL 37–10 · replay 97% for the winner
- Patriots at Jets NE 33–0 · replay 97% for the winner