Week 2 2022 · September 18, 2022
Bears at Packers, Week 2 2022: who deserved to win?
The Packers beat the Bears 27–10, and it was no fluke: replayed with the way both teams actually played, the Packers win 9 of 10.
Before kickoff the Packers were 78% favorites.
Final
| 10 | |
| 27 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +12 Packers about even · −12 Bears
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Bears win 1, Packers win 9.
- 1 CHI 12 GB 6
- 2 CHI 25 GB 27
- 3 CHI 3 GB 7
- 4 CHI 16 GB 23
- 5 CHI 3 GB 13
- 6 CHI 13 GB 26
- 7 CHI 24 GB 40
- 8 CHI 0 GB 20
- 9 CHI 7 GB 31
- 10 CHI 7 GB 38
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Bears win 12% of them, Packers 88%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Packers by 17.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Bears by 17+ | 0.7% |
| Bears by 9–16 | 2.9% |
| Bears by 1–8 | 8.1% |
| Level after regulation | 2.1% |
| Packers by 1–8 | 19.4% |
| Packers by 9–16 | 24.9% |
| Packers by 17+ | 41.9% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Packers by 17. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Packers by 9.6.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- M. Crosby, 40 yds made · 86% expected
- C. Santos, 44 yds made · 80% expected
- M. Crosby, 28 yds made · 97% expected
When it happened
Packers’ chance of winning
As low as 39% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 15:00 | Low Block on the Bears (Kindle Vildor), 15 yardsJudgment calls · 7 flags in 1317 snaps before, position avg 1 per 216 | +5% GB | GB: Field goal |
| 2 | Q1 12:22 | The Packers converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 35% expected | +6% GB | GB: Field goal |
| 3 | Q1 10:10 | The Packers converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 29% expected | +7% GB | GB: Field goal |
| 4 | Q1 9:23 | The Packers got away with an interception-worthy throwInterceptions · 47% expected to stay out of the defense's hands | +5% GB | GB: Field goal |
| 5 | Q1 7:06 | The Bears fumbled and recovered it themselvesFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +5% CHI | CHI: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q2 12:41 | The Packers were stopped on 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 29% expected | +7% CHI | GB: Punt |
| 7 | Q2 7:39 | Offensive Holding on the Packers, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +4% CHI | CHI: Punt |
| 8 | Q2 6:05 | The Packers converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 33% expected | +4% GB | GB: Touchdown |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Krys Barnes (GB LB), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Bears 6% · Packers 94%
- Final margin
- Packers by 17
- Luck in points
- 7.4 for the Packers
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Packers by 9.6
- Replay with same day's form
- Bears 12% · Packers 88% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 2 2022 games ·
Bears ·
Packers
More from Week 2 2022
- Chargers at Chiefs KC 27–24 · replay 33% for the winner
- Panthers at Giants NYG 19–16 · replay 74% for the winner
- Colts at Jaguars JAX 24–0 · replay 99% for the winner
- Dolphins at Ravens MIA 42–38 · replay 46% for the winner
- Patriots at Steelers NE 17–14 · replay 78% for the winner
- Jets at Browns NYJ 31–30 · replay 2% for the winner
- Buccaneers at Saints TB 20–10 · replay 66% for the winner
- Commanders at Lions DET 36–27 · replay 55% for the winner
- Falcons at Rams LA 31–27 · replay 82% for the winner
- Seahawks at 49ers SF 27–7 · replay 73% for the winner
- Cardinals at Raiders ARI 29–23 · replay 66% for the winner
- Bengals at Cowboys DAL 20–17 · replay 79% for the winner
- Texans at Broncos DEN 16–9 · replay 97% for the winner
- Titans at Bills BUF 41–7 · replay 99% for the winner
- Vikings at Eagles PHI 24–7 · replay 99% for the winner