Week 3 2022 · September 25, 2022
Jaguars at Chargers, Week 3 2022: who deserved to win?
The Jaguars beat the Chargers 38–10, and it was no fluke: replayed with the way both teams actually played, the Jaguars win 9 of 10. The Chargers had the bounces: drops alone were worth 3.0 points to the Chargers.
An off day for the Chargers: their offense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against the Jaguars they would win 57% of the time; with this day’s form, 14%. The numbers
Before kickoff the Chargers were 68% favorites. The biggest swing (Q2, 12:34 left): the Chargers were stopped on 3rd & 10, worth 17 points of win probability to the Jaguars.
Final
| 38 | |
| 10 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +14 Jaguars about even · −14 Chargers
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Jaguars win 9, Chargers win 1.
- 1 JAX 30 LAC 0
- 2 JAX 33 LAC 12
- 3 JAX 27 LAC 10
- 4 JAX 30 LAC 16
- 5 JAX 20 LAC 8
- 6 JAX 33 LAC 24
- 7 JAX 27 LAC 20
- 8 JAX 17 LAC 13
- 9 JAX 23 LAC 21
- 10 JAX 20 LAC 27
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
An off day for the Chargers
Their offense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against the Jaguars they would win 57% of the time; with this day’s form, 14%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
43 points apart for the Chargers: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaguars offenseEPA per play gained | +0.16 | +0.07 | better by 0.10 |
| Jaguars defenseEPA per play allowed | −0.01 | +0.15 | better by 0.16 |
| Chargers offenseEPA per play gained | −0.01 | +0.16 | worse by 0.17 |
| Chargers defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.16 | +0.12 | worse by 0.05 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
Jaguars win 86% of them, Chargers 14%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Jaguars by 28.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Jaguars by 17+ | 39.0% |
| Jaguars by 9–16 | 25.7% |
| Jaguars by 1–8 | 20.5% |
| Level after regulation | 1.2% |
| Chargers by 1–8 | 9.7% |
| Chargers by 9–16 | 3.1% |
| Chargers by 17+ | 0.8% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Jaguars by 28. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Jaguars by 22.4.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- R. Patterson, 22 yds made · 99% expected
- R. Patterson, 23 yds made · 99% expected
- R. Patterson, 23 yds made · 99% expected
- D. Hopkins, 25 yds made · 98% expected
When it happened
Chargers’ chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 64%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 12:13 | The Jaguars were stopped on 4th & 53rd & 4th downs · 40% expected | +6% LAC | JAX: Punt |
| 2 | Q2 15:00 | R. Patterson made 22-yard field goalKicks · 99% expected for him | +8% LAC | JAX: Field goal |
| 3 | Q2 14:49 | The Chargers were intercepted on a well-placed throwInterceptions · 0% expected to stay out of the defense's hands | +9% JAX | LAC: Turnover |
| 4 | Q2 12:34 | The Chargers were stopped on 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 26% expectedThe Chargers fumbled and the Jaguars recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +17% JAX | LAC: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q2 4:55 | The Jaguars converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 41% expected | +7% JAX | JAX: Field goal |
| 6 | Q2 1:04 | R. Patterson made 23-yard field goalKicks · 99% expected for him | +8% LAC | JAX: End of half |
| 7 | Q3 14:00 | The Chargers converted 3rd & 153rd & 4th downs · 20% expected | +12% LAC | LAC: Field goal |
| 8 | Q3 10:47 | The Jaguars converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 73% expected | +12% JAX | JAX: Touchdown |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Keenan Allen (LAC WR), out · 0.9 pts
- Corey Linsley (LAC C), out · 0.7 pts
- Shaquill Griffin (JAX CB), out · 0.7 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Jaguars 100% · Chargers 0%
- Final margin
- Jaguars by 28
- Luck in points
- 5.6 for the Jaguars
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Jaguars by 22.4
- Replay with same day's form
- Jaguars 86% · Chargers 14% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 3 2022 games ·
Jaguars ·
Chargers
More from Week 3 2022
- Steelers at Browns CLE 29–17 · replay 83% for the winner
- Ravens at Patriots BAL 37–26 · replay 68% for the winner
- Bills at Dolphins MIA 21–19 · replay 60% for the winner
- Bengals at Jets CIN 27–12 · replay 94% for the winner
- Lions at Vikings MIN 28–24 · replay 77% for the winner
- Texans at Bears CHI 23–20 · replay 72% for the winner
- Chiefs at Colts IND 20–17 · replay 5% for the winner
- Raiders at Titans TEN 24–22 · replay 54% for the winner
- Saints at Panthers CAR 22–14 · replay 78% for the winner
- Eagles at Commanders PHI 24–8 · replay 93% for the winner
- Falcons at Seahawks ATL 27–23 · replay 54% for the winner
- Packers at Buccaneers GB 14–12 · replay 53% for the winner
- Rams at Cardinals LA 20–12 · replay 81% for the winner
- 49ers at Broncos DEN 11–10 · replay 45% for the winner
- Cowboys at Giants DAL 23–16 · replay 96% for the winner