Week 9 2025 · November 2, 2025
Chargers at Titans, Week 9 2025: who deserved to win?
The Chargers beat the Titans 27–20, and the replays back it up: with the way both teams actually played, the Chargers win 10 of 10.
Before kickoff the Chargers were 77% favorites. The biggest swing (Q1, 11:25 left): Return touchdown by the Titans, worth 21 points of win probability to the Titans.
Final
| 27 | |
| 20 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +2 Chargers about even · −2 Titans
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Chargers win 10, Titans win 0.
- 1 LAC 40 TEN 7
- 2 LAC 29 TEN 0
- 3 LAC 34 TEN 9
- 4 LAC 38 TEN 17
- 5 LAC 19 TEN 0
- 6 LAC 29 TEN 13
- 7 LAC 20 TEN 6
- 8 LAC 13 TEN 3
- 9 LAC 14 TEN 7
- 10 LAC 31 TEN 28
Your call
Did the Chargers earn it, or get lucky?
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Chargers win 98% of them, Titans 2%. The line is what actually happened: Chargers by 7.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Chargers by 17+ | 78.0% |
| Chargers by 9–16 | 13.7% |
| Chargers by 1–8 | 6.3% |
| Level after regulation | 0.5% |
| Titans by 1–8 | 1.4% |
| Titans by 9–16 | 0.2% |
| Titans by 17+ | 0.0% |
Where the luck was
What the luck was worth
Every lucky and unlucky play, weighted by the moment it happened: its swing in win probability, added up by kind. A missed kick in a decided game counts for nothing; the same kick at the end of a tie game can be most of a win.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- C. Dicker, 27 yds made · 99% expected
- J. Slye, 49 yds made · 72% expected
- C. Dicker, 52 yds made · 73% expected
- J. Slye, 37 yds made · 91% expected
Penalties: Chargers 3 for 20 yards, Titans 7 for 60 yards
Every accepted flag, in order, and what it did to the helped team’s chance of winning at that moment, including any play it wiped out (points on the scoreboard in grey). A flag in a decided game is worth nothing; one at the turn of a close game can be worth most of a win. Judgment calls count half toward luck; pre-snap fouls, which repeat, don’t count. How calls are valued
| When | Flag | Win probability for |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 15:00 | Offensive Holding on the Titans (Julius Chestnut), 10 yards | 0% LAC +0.9 pts |
| Q1 10:34 | Face Mask on the Titans (Cedric Gray), 15 yards | +4% LAC +1.5 pts |
| Q1 7:17 | Illegal Formation on the Titans, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% LAC +0.8 pts |
| Q1 2:55 | Unnecessary Roughness on the Chargers (Teair Tart), 15 yards | +4% TEN +0.9 pts |
| Q2 12:50 | Offensive Holding on the Titans (Elic Ayomanor), 10 yards | +5% LAC +1.8 pts |
| Q2 12:28 | False Start on the Titans, 5 yards · pre-snap | +1% LAC +0.4 pts |
| Q2 8:37 | Kickoff Out of Bounds on the Chargers (Cameron Dicker), 0 yards · pre-snap | 0% TEN 0.0 pts |
| Q2 7:56 | False Start on the Titans, 5 yards · pre-snap | +4% LAC +0.6 pts |
| Q2 7:01 | Offensive Holding on the Titans, 10 yards | +5% LAC +0.8 pts |
| Q3 0:21 | False Start on the Chargers, 5 yards · pre-snap | +2% TEN +0.6 pts |
Chargers penalties, every game · Titans penalties, every game · All teams, 2025
When it happened
Titans’ chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 71%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 11:25 | The Chargers threw an interception-worthy pass, and it was pickedInterceptions · defenses catch 54% of interception-worthy throwsReturn touchdown by the TitansSpecial teams | +21% TEN | LAC: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q1 3:13 | Return touchdown by the TitansSpecial teams | +9% TEN | TEN: Opp touchdown |
| 3 | Q2 5:07 | J. Slye made a 49-yard field goalKicks · 72% expected for him, 52 of 79 from 45+ before | +7% TEN | TEN: Punt |
| 4 | Q2 3:52 | The Titans got away with an interception-worthy throwInterceptions · defenses catch 54% of interception-worthy throws | +8% TEN | TEN: Punt |
| 5 | Q2 3:09 | The Titans were stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 52% expected | +7% LAC | TEN: Punt |
| 6 | Q2 0:08 | The Titans fumbled and recovered it themselvesFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +8% TEN | TEN: Turnover on downs |
| 7 | Q3 12:24 | The Titans converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 34% expected | +9% TEN | TEN: Turnover on downs |
| 8 | Q3 7:09 | The Titans were stopped on 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 67% expected | +15% LAC | TEN: Punt |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Jeffery Simmons (TEN DT), out · 0.8 pts
- Calvin Ridley (TEN WR), out · 0.7 pts
- L'Jarius Sneed (TEN CB), out (IR) · 0.6 pts
- Xavier Woods (TEN S), out · 0.4 pts
- Oluwafemi Oladejo (TEN LB), out (IR) · 0.1 pts
- Tarheeb Still (LAC CB), out · 0.7 pts
- Austin Deculus (LAC T), out · 0.3 pts
- Tony Jefferson (LAC S), out · 0.2 pts
- Mekhi Becton (LAC G), out · 0.2 pts
- Omarion Hampton (LAC RB), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
- Da'Shawn Hand (LAC DL), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Chargers 76% · Titans 24%
- Final margin
- Chargers by 7
- Luck in points
- 4.3 for the Chargers
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Chargers by 2.7
- Replay with same day's form
- Chargers 98% · Titans 2% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 9 2025 games ·
Chargers ·
Titans
More from Week 9 2025
- Ravens at Dolphins BAL 28–6 · replay 95% for the winner
- Falcons at Patriots NE 24–23 · replay 86% for the winner
- Panthers at Packers CAR 16–13 · replay 27% for the winner
- Bears at Bengals CHI 47–42 · replay 65% for the winner
- Broncos at Texans DEN 18–15 · replay 72% for the winner
- Colts at Steelers PIT 27–20 · replay 39% for the winner
- Vikings at Lions MIN 27–24 · replay 60% for the winner
- 49ers at Giants SF 34–24 · replay 78% for the winner
- Jaguars at Raiders JAX 30–29 · replay 23% for the winner
- Saints at Rams LA 34–10 · replay 98% for the winner
- Chiefs at Bills BUF 28–21 · replay 86% for the winner
- Seahawks at Commanders SEA 38–14 · replay 82% for the winner
- Cardinals at Cowboys ARI 27–17 · replay 77% for the winner