Week 5 2022 · October 9, 2022
Giants vs Packers, Week 5 2022: who deserved to win?
The Giants beat the Packers 27–22 and were the better team on the day: replayed with the same form, they win 7 of 10. The Packers had the bounces: fumble bounces alone were worth 3.1 points to the Packers.
An off day for the Packers: their defense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against the Giants they would win 67% of the time; with this day’s form, 31%. The numbers
Before kickoff the Packers were 74% favorites. The biggest swing (Q4, 1:05 left): the Packers were stopped on 4th & 1, worth 17 points of win probability to the Giants.
Final
| 27 | |
| 22 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +31 Giants lucky · −31 Packers
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Giants win 7, Packers win 3.
- 1 NYG 30 GB 7
- 2 NYG 26 GB 10
- 3 NYG 27 GB 14
- 4 NYG 22 GB 13
- 5 NYG 17 GB 10
- 6 NYG 24 GB 20
- 7 NYG 26 GB 24
- 8 NYG 20 GB 23
- 9 NYG 17 GB 24
- 10 NYG 17 GB 34
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
An off day for the Packers
Their defense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against the Giants they would win 67% of the time; with this day’s form, 31%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
36 points apart for the Packers: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Giants offenseEPA per play gained | +0.32 | +0.02 | better by 0.30 |
| Giants defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.07 | +0.11 | better by 0.05 |
| Packers offenseEPA per play gained | +0.07 | +0.15 | worse by 0.09 |
| Packers defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.32 | +0.09 | worse by 0.23 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
Giants win 69% of them, Packers 31%, counting the 4% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Giants by 5.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Giants by 17+ | 20.4% |
| Giants by 9–16 | 22.1% |
| Giants by 1–8 | 26.2% |
| Level after regulation | 4.1% |
| Packers by 1–8 | 16.1% |
| Packers by 9–16 | 7.2% |
| Packers by 17+ | 3.9% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Giants by 5. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Giants by 9.4.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- M. Crosby, 46 yds made · 80% expected
- G. Gano, 48 yds made · 78% expected
- M. Crosby, 48 yds made · 76% expected
- G. Gano, 37 yds made · 92% expected
When it happened
Packers’ chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 87%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 14:16 | The Packers converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 32% expected | +12% GB | GB: Field goal |
| 2 | Q1 3:33 | Defensive Pass Interference on the Giants (Xavier McKinney), 33 yardsJudgment calls · 1 flag in 1646 snaps before, position avg 1 per 548 | +7% GB | GB: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q1 0:17 | The Giants were stopped on 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 34% expectedS. Barkley dropped a catchable passDrops · 0 drops on 17 catchable balls before this | +7% GB | NYG: Field goal |
| 4 | Q2 4:08 | The Giants converted 3rd & 133rd & 4th downs · 23% expected | +7% NYG | NYG: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q3 4:09 | The Packers were stopped on 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 32% expected | +5% NYG | GB: Punt |
| 6 | Q4 10:08 | The Packers got away with an interception-worthy throwInterceptions · 46% expected to stay out of the defense's hands | +8% GB | GB: Punt |
| 7 | Q4 3:23 | A. Lazard dropped a catchable passDrops · 0 drops on 17 catchable balls before this | +9% NYG | GB: Turnover on downs |
| 8 | Q4 1:05 | The Packers were stopped on 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 67% expected | +17% NYG | GB: End of game |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Sammy Watkins (GB WR), out (IR) · 0.6 pts
- Krys Barnes (GB LB), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
- Kenny Golladay (NYG WR), out · 0.7 pts
- Leonard Williams (NYG DT), out · 0.6 pts
- Sterling Shepard (NYG WR), out (IR) · 0.5 pts
- Azeez Ojulari (NYG LB), out · 0.2 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Giants 86% · Packers 14%
- Final margin
- Giants by 5
- Luck in points
- 4.4 for the Packers
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Giants by 9.4
- Replay with same day's form
- Giants 69% · Packers 31% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 5 2022 games ·
Giants ·
Packers
More from Week 5 2022
- Colts at Broncos IND 12–9 · replay 3% for the winner
- Falcons at Buccaneers TB 21–15 · replay 64% for the winner
- Bears at Vikings MIN 29–22 · replay 92% for the winner
- Lions at Patriots NE 29–0 · replay 88% for the winner
- Texans at Jaguars HOU 13–6 · replay 31% for the winner
- Chargers at Browns LAC 30–28 · replay 34% for the winner
- Dolphins at Jets NYJ 40–17 · replay 91% for the winner
- Steelers at Bills BUF 38–3 · replay 98% for the winner
- Seahawks at Saints NO 39–32 · replay 50% for the winner
- Titans at Commanders TEN 21–17 · replay 37% for the winner
- 49ers at Panthers SF 37–15 · replay 82% for the winner
- Cowboys at Rams DAL 22–10 · replay 32% for the winner
- Eagles at Cardinals PHI 20–17 · replay 35% for the winner
- Bengals at Ravens BAL 19–17 · replay 40% for the winner
- Raiders at Chiefs KC 30–29 · replay 59% for the winner