luckadjusted

Week 14 2023 · December 10, 2023

Lions at Bears, Week 14 2023: who deserved to win?

The Bears beat the Lions 28–13, and it was no fluke: replayed with the way both teams actually played, the Bears win 8 of 10.

An off day for the Lions: their offense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against the Bears they would win 54% of the time; with this day’s form, 15%. The numbers

Before kickoff the Lions were 59% favorites. The biggest swing (Q3, 1:42 left): the Bears converted 4th & 13, worth 25 points of win probability to the Bears.

Final

Detroit Lions 13
Chicago Bears 28

December 10, 2023 · Soldier Field · Closing line: Lions −3

Luck index +15 Bears about even · −15 Lions

Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works

Ten replays. Lions win 2, Bears win 8.

  1. 1 DET 27 CHI 16
  2. 2 DET 17 CHI 14
  3. 3 DET 24 CHI 26
  4. 4 DET 14 CHI 19
  5. 5 DET 26 CHI 34
  6. 6 DET 7 CHI 19
  7. 7 DET 16 CHI 31
  8. 8 DET 6 CHI 24
  9. 9 DET 3 CHI 27
  10. 10 DET 12 CHI 43

Three other ways to ask

Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.

The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.

The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.

Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.

An off day for the Lions

Their offense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against the Bears they would win 54% of the time; with this day’s form, 15%.

39 points apart for the Lions: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.

UnitThis gameUsual levelBetter or worse than usual
Lions offenseEPA per play gained +0.01 +0.15 worse by 0.14
Lions defenseEPA per play allowed +0.10 +0.11 better by 0.02
Bears offenseEPA per play gained +0.10 +0.09 better by 0.01
Bears defenseEPA per play allowed +0.01 +0.15 better by 0.14

EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.

How 4,000 replays ended

Lions win 15% of them, Bears 85%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Bears by 15.

Show as a table
Final margin in the replaysShare of replays
Lions by 17+1.3%
Lions by 9–163.1%
Lions by 1–89.7%
Level after regulation1.9%
Bears by 1–820.1%
Bears by 9–1624.3%
Bears by 17+39.7%

Where the luck was

Take the luck out

The final margin was Bears by 15. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Bears by 5.6.

Each row takes one kind of luck out of the margin. Color shows which team it helped. Luck shares are the fitted ones (how much of each component is luck).

The kicks

How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.

  • C. Santos, 46 yds made · 73% expected
  • C. Santos, 25 yds made · 98% expected
  • C. Santos, 28 yds made · 97% expected
  • Extra point missed · 93% expected
  • Extra point missed · 93% expected
Bar: expected chance of a make. Filled dot: made. Open dot: missed or blocked.

When it happened

Bears’ chance of winning

As low as 33% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.

nflfastR’s in-game win probability. It ignores the betting line, so it starts near even. Shaded above the middle while the Bears were ahead in it, below while the Lions were.
#WhenWhat happenedWin probability forNext drive
1 Q1 2:06 The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 30% expected +7% DET CHI: Field goal
2 Q2 9:01 The Lions converted 4th & 33rd & 4th downs · 52% expected +9% DET DET: Touchdown
3 Q2 3:54 The Lions converted 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 61% expected +7% DET DET: Touchdown
4 Q3 10:38 The Bears converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 32% expected +9% CHI CHI: Field goal
5 Q3 7:36 Offensive Holding on the Bears, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls +12% DET DET: Punt
6 Q3 3:26 The Bears converted 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 52% expected +8% CHI CHI: Touchdown
7 Q3 1:42 The Bears converted 4th & 133rd & 4th downs · 24% expected +25% CHI CHI: Touchdown
8 Q4 14:19 The Bears converted 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 27% expected +8% CHI CHI: Touchdown

Missing players

Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.

  • Frank Ragnow (DET C), out · 0.8 pts
  • Alim McNeill (DET DT), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
  • Scott Daly (DET LS), out (IR) · 0.1 pts

Adjust the assumptions

Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.

Only coin-flips re-rolled

Lions 10% · Bears 90%

Final margin
Bears by 15
Luck in points
9.4 for the Bears
Luck-adjusted margin
Bears by 5.6
Replay with same day's form
Lions 15% · Bears 85% unchanged: why
How much of each is luck?

0% treats it as skill, 100% as pure luck. The tick is our fit.

What counts

We tested momentum on 19,000 lucky breaks and found none, so it's off by default. Why

Flip a play

Force the other outcome, in this game and in every replay: a made kick becomes a miss, a stop becomes a conversion, a flag goes the other way.

About these numbers

Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.

Methodology and validation · All Week 14 2023 games · Lions · Bears

More from Week 14 2023