luckadjusted

Week 5 2019 · October 6, 2019

No FTN charting for this game (drops and interception-worthy throws are not modelled).

Bears vs Raiders, Week 5 2019: who deserved to win?

The Raiders beat the Bears 24–21, and it was no fluke: replayed with the way both teams actually played, the Raiders win 9 of 10. The Bears had the bounces: judgment calls alone were worth 3.5 points to the Bears.

An off day for the Bears: their defense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against the Raiders they would win 63% of the time; with this day’s form, 13%. The numbers

Before kickoff the Bears were 68% favorites. The biggest swing (Q4, 11:26 left): Roughing the Passer on the Raiders (Maurice Hurst Jr.), 15 yards, wiping out the play, worth 28 points of win probability to the Bears.

Final

Chicago Bears 21
Oakland Raiders 24

October 6, 2019 · Tottenham Stadium · Closing line: Bears −6.5

Luck index +13 Raiders about even · −13 Bears

Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works

Ten replays. Bears win 1, Raiders win 9.

  1. 1 CHI 24 OAK 16
  2. 2 CHI 15 OAK 17
  3. 3 CHI 17 OAK 21
  4. 4 CHI 20 OAK 27
  5. 5 CHI 13 OAK 23
  6. 6 CHI 10 OAK 23
  7. 7 CHI 6 OAK 22
  8. 8 CHI 0 OAK 20
  9. 9 CHI 3 OAK 26
  10. 10 CHI 10 OAK 41

Three other ways to ask

Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.

The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.

The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.

Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.

An off day for the Bears

Their defense played far below its usual level. In a fresh game against the Raiders they would win 63% of the time; with this day’s form, 13%.

51 points apart for the Bears: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.

UnitThis gameUsual levelBetter or worse than usual
Bears offenseEPA per play gained +0.11 +0.12 worse by 0.01
Bears defenseEPA per play allowed +0.23 +0.02 worse by 0.20
Raiders offenseEPA per play gained +0.23 +0.13 better by 0.10
Raiders defenseEPA per play allowed +0.11 +0.17 better by 0.06

EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.

How 4,000 replays ended

Bears win 13% of them, Raiders 87%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Raiders by 3.

Show as a table
Final margin in the replaysShare of replays
Bears by 17+0.9%
Bears by 9–162.6%
Bears by 1–88.3%
Level after regulation1.6%
Raiders by 1–820.9%
Raiders by 9–1624.3%
Raiders by 17+41.2%

Where the luck was

Take the luck out

The final margin was Raiders by 3. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Raiders by 10.1.

Each row takes one kind of luck out of the margin. Color shows which team it helped. Luck shares are the fitted ones (how much of each component is luck).

When it happened

Raiders’ chance of winning

As low as 21% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.

nflfastR’s in-game win probability. It ignores the betting line, so it starts near even. Shaded above the middle while the Raiders were ahead in it, below while the Bears were.
#WhenWhat happenedWin probability forNext drive
1 Q1 10:03 The Raiders were stopped on 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 28% expectedUnnecessary Roughness on the Raiders, 15 yardsJudgment calls +10% CHI OAK: Punt
2 Q3 5:26 The Bears converted 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 60% expected +10% CHI CHI: Touchdown
3 Q4 13:58 The Raiders fumbled and the Bears recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 +15% CHI OAK: Touchdown
4 Q4 11:26 Roughing the Passer on the Raiders (Maurice Hurst Jr.), 15 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls · 0 flags in 156 snaps before, position avg 1 per 242 +28% CHI CHI: Punt
5 Q4 5:48 The Raiders converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 74% expected +10% OAK OAK: Touchdown
6 Q4 4:29 The Raiders converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 74% expected +11% OAK OAK: Touchdown
7 Q4 1:57 Unnecessary Roughness on the Bears (Eddie Goldman), 15 yardsJudgment calls · 1 flag in 156 snaps before, position avg 1 per 411 +20% OAK OAK: Punt
8 Q4 0:03 The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 51% expected +11% OAK –

Missing players

Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.

  • Tyrell Williams (OAK WR), out · 0.7 pts
  • Clelin Ferrell (OAK DE), out · 0.5 pts
  • Brandon Parker (OAK T), out · 0.5 pts
  • Jordan Devey (OAK C), out (IR) · 0.4 pts
  • Taylor Gabriel (CHI WR), out · 0.6 pts

Adjust the assumptions

Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.

Only coin-flips re-rolled

Bears 14% · Raiders 86%

Final margin
Raiders by 3
Luck in points
7.1 for the Bears
Luck-adjusted margin
Raiders by 10.1
Replay with same day's form
Bears 13% · Raiders 87% unchanged: why
How much of each is luck?

0% treats it as skill, 100% as pure luck. The tick is our fit.

What counts

We tested momentum on 19,000 lucky breaks and found none, so it's off by default. Why

Flip a play

Force the other outcome, in this game and in every replay: a made kick becomes a miss, a stop becomes a conversion, a flag goes the other way.

About these numbers

Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting (not available for this game); injuries from snap counts and injury reports. No FTN charting for this game (drops and interception-worthy throws are not modelled).

Methodology and validation · All Week 5 2019 games · Bears · Raiders

More from Week 5 2019