Week 3 2020 · September 27, 2020
No FTN charting for this game (drops and interception-worthy throws are not modelled).
Panthers at Chargers, Week 3 2020: who deserved to win?
The Panthers beat the Chargers 21–16 and were the better team on the day: replayed with the same form, they win 6 of 10. The Chargers had the bounces: 3rd & 4th downs alone were worth 5.1 points to the Chargers.
Before kickoff the Chargers were 67% favorites. The biggest swing (Q4, 0:06 left): the Chargers were stopped on 3rd & 15, worth 38 points of win probability to the Panthers.
Final
| 21 | |
| 16 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +40 Panthers lucky · −40 Chargers
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Panthers win 6, Chargers win 4.
- 1 CAR 34 LAC 10
- 2 CAR 30 LAC 13
- 3 CAR 23 LAC 10
- 4 CAR 24 LAC 16
- 5 CAR 13 LAC 9
- 6 CAR 27 LAC 25
- 7 CAR 12 LAC 14
- 8 CAR 16 LAC 22
- 9 CAR 12 LAC 23
- 10 CAR 16 LAC 37
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Panthers win 60% of them, Chargers 40%, counting the 4% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Panthers by 5.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Panthers by 17+ | 15.9% |
| Panthers by 9–16 | 17.6% |
| Panthers by 1–8 | 24.4% |
| Level after regulation | 3.8% |
| Chargers by 1–8 | 18.1% |
| Chargers by 9–16 | 12.6% |
| Chargers by 17+ | 7.6% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Panthers by 5. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Panthers by 2.0.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- J. Slye, 29 yds made · 97% expected
- J. Slye, 24 yds made · 99% expected
- J. Slye, 30 yds made · 97% expected
- J. Slye, 22 yds made · 99% expected
- M. Badgley, 41 yds made · 87% expected
- J. Slye, 31 yds made · 96% expected
- Extra point missed · 95% expected
When it happened
Chargers’ chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 65%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 7:52 | The Chargers fumbled and the Panthers recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +8% CAR | LAC: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q1 6:32 | The Panthers converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 34% expected | +8% CAR | CAR: Field goal |
| 3 | Q2 8:54 | The Panthers were stopped on 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 52% expected | +8% LAC | CAR: Field goal |
| 4 | Q2 2:00 | Offensive Pass Interference on the Chargers (Mike Williams), 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls · 3 flags in 973 snaps before, position avg 1 per 385 | +17% CAR | CAR: Field goal |
| 5 | Q2 0:03 | J. Slye made 22-yard field goalKicks · 99% expected for him | +12% LAC | CAR: Punt |
| 6 | Q4 4:39 | The Chargers converted 3rd & 143rd & 4th downs · 22% expected | +11% LAC | LAC: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q4 0:36 | Roughing the Passer on the Panthers (Yetur Gross-Matos), 15 yardsJudgment calls · 0 flags in 18 snaps before, position avg 1 per 259 | +17% LAC | LAC: Turnover |
| 8 | Q4 0:06 | The Chargers were stopped on 3rd & 153rd & 4th downs · 21% expectedThe Chargers fumbled and the Panthers recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +38% CAR | – |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Melvin Ingram (LAC DE), out (IR) · 0.8 pts
- Derwin James (LAC FS), out (IR) · 0.7 pts
- Justin Jones (LAC DT), out (IR) · 0.4 pts
- Drue Tranquill (LAC LB), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
- Russell Okung (CAR T), out · 0.9 pts
- Christian McCaffrey (CAR RB), out (IR) · 0.8 pts
- Dennis Daley (CAR G), out · 0.3 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Panthers 59% · Chargers 41%
- Final margin
- Panthers by 5
- Luck in points
- 3.0 for the Panthers
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Panthers by 2.0
- Replay with same day's form
- Panthers 60% · Chargers 40% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting (not available for this game); injuries from snap counts and injury reports. No FTN charting for this game (drops and interception-worthy throws are not modelled).
Methodology and validation · All Week 3 2020 games ·
Panthers ·
Chargers
More from Week 3 2020
- Dolphins at Jaguars MIA 31–13 · replay 65% for the winner
- Bears at Falcons CHI 30–26 · replay 18% for the winner
- Bengals at Eagles PHI 23–23 · replay 47% for the winner
- Texans at Steelers PIT 28–21 · replay 72% for the winner
- Rams at Bills BUF 35–32 · replay 25% for the winner
- Raiders at Patriots NE 36–20 · replay 59% for the winner
- 49ers at Giants SF 36–9 · replay 97% for the winner
- Titans at Vikings TEN 31–30 · replay 40% for the winner
- Washington at Browns CLE 34–20 · replay 97% for the winner
- Jets at Colts IND 36–7 · replay 89% for the winner
- Cowboys at Seahawks SEA 38–31 · replay 34% for the winner
- Lions at Cardinals DET 26–23 · replay 30% for the winner
- Buccaneers at Broncos TB 28–10 · replay 86% for the winner
- Packers at Saints GB 37–30 · replay 70% for the winner
- Chiefs at Ravens KC 34–20 · replay 83% for the winner