Week 5 2023 · October 9, 2023
Packers at Raiders, Week 5 2023: who deserved to win?
The Raiders beat the Packers 17–13, and it was no fluke: replayed with the way both teams actually played, the Raiders win 8 of 10. The Packers had the bounces: kicks alone were worth 7.0 points to the Packers.
Before kickoff it was a pick’em. The biggest swing (Q4, 0:51 left): the Packers were stopped on 3rd & 10, worth 44 points of win probability to the Raiders.
Final
| 13 | |
| 17 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +19 Raiders about even · −19 Packers
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Packers win 2, Raiders win 8.
- 1 GB 16 LV 2
- 2 GB 30 LV 27
- 3 GB 38 LV 41
- 4 GB 7 LV 12
- 5 GB 14 LV 22
- 6 GB 14 LV 24
- 7 GB 17 LV 31
- 8 GB 9 LV 27
- 9 GB 7 LV 29
- 10 GB 3 LV 30
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Packers win 19% of them, Raiders 81%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Raiders by 4.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Packers by 17+ | 1.8% |
| Packers by 9–16 | 5.2% |
| Packers by 1–8 | 11.9% |
| Level after regulation | 2.4% |
| Raiders by 1–8 | 25.4% |
| Raiders by 9–16 | 20.9% |
| Raiders by 17+ | 32.3% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Raiders by 4. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Raiders by 6.8.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- A. Carlson, 37 yds made · 92% expected
- D. Carlson, 26 yds made · 99% expected
- D. Carlson, 53 yds blocked · 74% expected
- A. Carlson, 22 yds made · 99% expected
- D. Carlson, 52 yds missed · 75% expected
When it happened
Raiders’ chance of winning
As low as 35% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q2 10:02 | The Raiders converted 3rd & 113rd & 4th downs · 24% expected | +11% LV | LV: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q3 11:12 | The Packers converted 4th & 23rd & 4th downs · 57% expected | +9% GB | GB: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q4 7:57 | The Raiders were stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 50% expected | +8% GB | LV: Punt |
| 4 | Q4 7:03 | Offensive Holding on the Packers (Tucker Kraft), 8 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls · 0 flags in 75 snaps before, position avg 1 per 286 | +13% LV | LV: Missed field goal |
| 5 | Q4 2:00 | D. Carlson missed 52-yard field goalKicks · 75% expected for him, 36 of 45 from 45+ before | +18% GB | LV: End of game |
| 6 | Q4 0:59 | R. Doubs dropped a catchable passDrops · 6 drops on 81 catchable balls before this | +18% LV | GB: Turnover |
| 7 | Q4 0:55 | L. Musgrave dropped a catchable passDrops · 0 drops on 18 catchable balls before this | +22% LV | GB: Turnover |
| 8 | Q4 0:51 | The Packers were stopped on 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 25% expectedThe Packers threw an interception-worthy pass, and it was pickedInterceptions · 48% expected to stay out of the defense's hands | +44% LV | – |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Nate Hobbs (LV CB), out · 0.6 pts
- Jakorian Bennett (LV CB), out · 0.4 pts
- David Bakhtiari (GB T), out (IR) · 1.3 pts
- De'Vondre Campbell (GB LB), out · 0.4 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Packers 9% · Raiders 91%
- Final margin
- Raiders by 4
- Luck in points
- 2.8 for the Packers
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Raiders by 6.8
- Replay with same day's form
- Packers 19% · Raiders 81% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 5 2023 games ·
Packers ·
Raiders
More from Week 5 2023
- Bears at Commanders CHI 40–20 · replay 22% for the winner
- Jaguars vs Bills JAX 25–20 · replay 14% for the winner
- Ravens at Steelers PIT 17–10 · replay 44% for the winner
- Panthers at Lions DET 42–24 · replay 92% for the winner
- Texans at Falcons ATL 21–19 · replay 41% for the winner
- Saints at Patriots NO 34–0 · replay 88% for the winner
- Giants at Dolphins MIA 31–16 · replay 100% for the winner
- Titans at Colts IND 23–16 · replay 50% for the winner
- Bengals at Cardinals CIN 34–20 · replay 65% for the winner
- Eagles at Rams PHI 23–14 · replay 92% for the winner
- Chiefs at Vikings KC 27–20 · replay 78% for the winner
- Jets at Broncos NYJ 31–21 · replay 37% for the winner
- Cowboys at 49ers SF 42–10 · replay 99% for the winner