Week 2 2024 · September 15, 2024
Rams at Cardinals, Week 2 2024: who deserved to win?
The Cardinals beat the Rams 41–10 and were the better team on the day: replayed with the same form, they win 8 of 10. The Rams had the bounces: judgment calls alone were worth 3.9 points to the Rams.
Before kickoff it was a pick’em.
Final
| 10 | |
| 41 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +21 Cardinals about even · −21 Rams
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Rams win 2, Cardinals win 8.
- 1 LA 43 ARI 28
- 2 LA 17 ARI 13
- 3 LA 27 ARI 30
- 4 LA 13 ARI 17
- 5 LA 26 ARI 33
- 6 LA 17 ARI 27
- 7 LA 15 ARI 28
- 8 LA 16 ARI 31
- 9 LA 12 ARI 31
- 10 LA 3 ARI 30
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Rams win 21% of them, Cardinals 79%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Cardinals by 31.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Rams by 17+ | 2.4% |
| Rams by 9–16 | 6.2% |
| Rams by 1–8 | 12.2% |
| Level after regulation | 1.8% |
| Cardinals by 1–8 | 26.6% |
| Cardinals by 9–16 | 21.1% |
| Cardinals by 17+ | 29.8% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Cardinals by 31. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Cardinals by 20.4.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- J. Karty, 29 yds made · 97% expected
- M. Prater, 48 yds made · 79% expected
- M. Prater, 57 yds made · 65% expected
When it happened
Cardinals’ chance of winning
As low as 48% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 13:40 | The Rams were stopped on 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 62% expected | +4% ARI | LA: Turnover on downs |
| 2 | Q1 13:37 | The Rams were stopped on 4th & 23rd & 4th downs · 61% expected | +7% ARI | LA: Punt |
| 3 | Q1 9:45 | The Rams were stopped on 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 46% expected | +5% ARI | LA: Punt |
| 4 | Q1 3:35 | The Cardinals converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 44% expected | +3% ARI | ARI: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q2 2:16 | The Cardinals were stopped on 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 38% expected | +2% LA | ARI: Punt |
| 6 | Q2 1:23 | The Rams converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 32% expected | +2% LA | LA: Turnover on downs |
| 7 | Q2 0:58 | T. Atwell dropped a catchable passDrops · 3 drops on 67 catchable balls before this | +2% ARI | LA: Turnover on downs |
| 8 | Q2 0:05 | The Rams were stopped on 4th & 43rd & 4th downs · 37% expected | +2% ARI | LA: Punt |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Carter O'Donnell (ARI T), out (IR) · 0.4 pts
- Dante Stills (ARI DE), out · 0.3 pts
- Puka Nacua (LA WR), out (IR) · 1.6 pts
- Alaric Jackson (LA T), out (IR) · 0.6 pts
- Tyler Higbee (LA TE), out (IR) · 0.6 pts
- Steve Avila (LA G), out (IR) · 0.4 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Rams 0% · Cardinals 100%
- Final margin
- Cardinals by 31
- Luck in points
- 10.6 for the Cardinals
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Cardinals by 20.4
- Replay with same day's form
- Rams 21% · Cardinals 79% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 2 2024 games ·
Rams ·
Cardinals
More from Week 2 2024
- Bills at Dolphins BUF 31–10 · replay 67% for the winner
- Browns at Jaguars CLE 18–13 · replay 9% for the winner
- Colts at Packers GB 16–10 · replay 70% for the winner
- Chargers at Panthers LAC 26–3 · replay 98% for the winner
- Raiders at Ravens LV 26–23 · replay 16% for the winner
- Saints at Cowboys NO 44–19 · replay 89% for the winner
- Giants at Commanders WAS 21–18 · replay 79% for the winner
- Jets at Titans NYJ 24–17 · replay 40% for the winner
- Seahawks at Patriots SEA 23–20 · replay 83% for the winner
- 49ers at Vikings MIN 23–17 · replay 47% for the winner
- Buccaneers at Lions TB 20–16 · replay 18% for the winner
- Bengals at Chiefs KC 26–25 · replay 75% for the winner
- Steelers at Broncos PIT 13–6 · replay 50% for the winner
- Bears at Texans HOU 19–13 · replay 49% for the winner
- Falcons at Eagles ATL 22–21 · replay 35% for the winner