Week 11 2025 · November 16, 2025
Bears at Vikings, Week 11 2025: who deserved to win?
The Bears beat the Vikings 19–17 and were the better team on the day: replayed with the same form, they win 8 of 10. The Vikings had the bounces: judgment calls alone were worth 1.8 points to the Vikings.
An off day for the Vikings: they played far below what the matchup promised. In a fresh game against the Bears they would win 56% of the time; with this day’s form, 20%. The numbers
Before kickoff the Vikings were 59% favorites. The biggest swing (Q4, 0:04 left): C. Santos made 48-yard field goal, worth 37 points of win probability to the Bears.
Final
| 19 | |
| 17 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +20 Bears about even · −20 Vikings
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Bears win 8, Vikings win 2.
- 1 CHI 47 MIN 16
- 2 CHI 35 MIN 13
- 3 CHI 29 MIN 12
- 4 CHI 23 MIN 9
- 5 CHI 24 MIN 13
- 6 CHI 20 MIN 13
- 7 CHI 32 MIN 27
- 8 CHI 19 MIN 17
- 9 CHI 20 MIN 23
- 10 CHI 12 MIN 26
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
An off day for the Vikings
They played far below what the matchup promised. In a fresh game against the Bears they would win 56% of the time; with this day’s form, 20%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
36 points apart for the Vikings: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bears offenseEPA per play gained | −0.02 | +0.07 | worse by 0.09 |
| Bears defenseEPA per play allowed | −0.02 | +0.14 | better by 0.15 |
| Vikings offenseEPA per play gained | −0.02 | +0.08 | worse by 0.09 |
| Vikings defenseEPA per play allowed | −0.02 | +0.07 | better by 0.09 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
Bears win 80% of them, Vikings 20%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Bears by 2.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Bears by 17+ | 33.8% |
| Bears by 9–16 | 20.1% |
| Bears by 1–8 | 24.6% |
| Level after regulation | 2.0% |
| Vikings by 1–8 | 11.3% |
| Vikings by 9–16 | 5.8% |
| Vikings by 17+ | 2.6% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Bears by 2. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Vikings by 0.4.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- W. Reichard, 31 yds made · 97% expected
- C. Santos, 38 yds made · 92% expected
- C. Santos, 54 yds made · 69% expected
- C. Santos, 33 yds made · 96% expected
- C. Santos, 45 yds missed · 83% expected
- C. Santos, 48 yds made · 78% expected
When it happened
Vikings’ chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 66%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q2 15:00 | The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 44% expectedL. Burden dropped a catchable passDrops · 0 drops on 17 catchable balls before this | +7% MIN | CHI: Punt |
| 2 | Q2 13:31 | The Vikings were stopped on 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 42% expectedA. Jones dropped a catchable passDrops · 11 drops on 179 catchable balls before this | +8% CHI | MIN: Punt |
| 3 | Q4 8:13 | C. Santos missed 45-yard field goalKicks · 83% expected for him, 43 of 60 from 45+ before | +12% MIN | CHI: Punt |
| 4 | Q4 7:32 | J. Addison dropped a catchable passDrops · 6 drops on 177 catchable balls before this | +7% CHI | MIN: Punt |
| 5 | Q4 6:32 | The Bears converted 3rd & 133rd & 4th downs · 22% expected | +7% CHI | CHI: Punt |
| 6 | Q4 2:07 | T. Hockenson dropped a catchable passDrops · 9 drops on 302 catchable balls before this | +8% CHI | MIN: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q4 1:59 | The Vikings converted 4th & 43rd & 4th downs · 41% expected | +7% MIN | MIN: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q4 0:04 | C. Santos made 48-yard field goalKicks · 78% expected for him, 43 of 61 from 45+ before | +37% CHI | – |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Carson Wentz (MIN QB), out (IR), replaced by j.mccarthy · 2.6 pts
- Jonathan Greenard (MIN LB), out · 0.5 pts
- Kyler Gordon (CHI DB), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
- T.J. Edwards (CHI LB), out · 0.3 pts
- Dayo Odeyingbo (CHI DL), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Bears 64% · Vikings 36%
- Final margin
- Bears by 2
- Luck in points
- 2.4 for the Bears
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Vikings by 0.4
- Replay with same day's form
- Bears 80% · Vikings 20% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 11 2025 games ·
Bears ·
Vikings
More from Week 11 2025
- Jets at Patriots NE 27–14 · replay 97% for the winner
- Commanders vs Dolphins MIA 16–13 · replay 53% for the winner
- Panthers at Falcons CAR 30–27 · replay 59% for the winner
- Bengals at Steelers PIT 34–12 · replay 75% for the winner
- Packers at Giants GB 27–20 · replay 83% for the winner
- Texans at Titans HOU 16–13 · replay 90% for the winner
- Chargers at Jaguars JAX 35–6 · replay 94% for the winner
- Buccaneers at Bills BUF 44–32 · replay 66% for the winner
- Seahawks at Rams LA 21–19 · replay 48% for the winner
- 49ers at Cardinals SF 41–22 · replay 74% for the winner
- Ravens at Browns BAL 23–16 · replay 99% for the winner
- Chiefs at Broncos DEN 22–19 · replay 42% for the winner
- Lions at Eagles PHI 16–9 · replay 12% for the winner
- Cowboys at Raiders DAL 33–16 · replay 94% for the winner