Week 2 2025 · September 14, 2025
Bears at Lions, Week 2 2025: who deserved to win?
The Lions beat the Bears 52–21, and it was no fluke: replayed with the way both teams actually played, the Lions win 10 of 10. The Bears had the bounces: judgment calls alone were worth 3.2 points to the Bears.
Before kickoff the Lions were 67% favorites. The biggest swing (Q1, 8:38 left): the Bears converted 3rd & 9, worth 12 points of win probability to the Bears.
Final
| 21 | |
| 52 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index 0 Lions about even · 0 Bears
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Bears win 0, Lions win 10.
- 1 CHI 27 DET 34
- 2 CHI 16 DET 30
- 3 CHI 10 DET 29
- 4 CHI 16 DET 38
- 5 CHI 23 DET 50
- 6 CHI 10 DET 41
- 7 CHI 16 DET 50
- 8 CHI 3 DET 41
- 9 CHI 6 DET 50
- 10 CHI 13 DET 65
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Bears win 0% of them, Lions 100%. The line is what actually happened: Lions by 31.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Bears by 17+ | 0.0% |
| Bears by 9–16 | 0.0% |
| Bears by 1–8 | 0.1% |
| Level after regulation | 0.1% |
| Lions by 1–8 | 0.9% |
| Lions by 9–16 | 3.5% |
| Lions by 17+ | 95.5% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Lions by 31. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Lions by 33.3.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- J. Bates, 55 yds missed · 68% expected
- J. Bates, 34 yds made · 95% expected
When it happened
Lions’ chance of winning
As low as 50% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 8:43 | K. Monangai dropped a catchable passDrops · 0 drops on 1 catchable balls before this | +5% DET | CHI: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q1 8:38 | The Bears converted 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 26% expected | +12% CHI | CHI: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q1 7:06 | The Lions were stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 41% expected | +5% CHI | DET: Punt |
| 4 | Q1 0:38 | The Bears fumbled and the Lions recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +5% DET | CHI: Turnover on downs |
| 5 | Q2 13:19 | The Bears were stopped on 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 70% expected | +6% DET | CHI: Turnover |
| 6 | Q2 12:02 | J. Bates missed 55-yard field goalKicks · 68% expected for him, 9 of 12 from 45+ before | +6% CHI | DET: Touchdown |
| 7 | Q2 10:14 | Face Mask on the Bears, 15 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +5% CHI | DET: Touchdown |
| 8 | Q3 6:28 | The Lions converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 35% expected | +4% DET | DET: Touchdown |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Levi Onwuzurike (DET DE), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
- Alim McNeill (DET DT), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
- Kyler Gordon (CHI CB), out · 0.5 pts
- Kiran Amegadjie (CHI T), out · 0.2 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Bears 0% · Lions 100%
- Final margin
- Lions by 31
- Luck in points
- 2.2 for the Bears
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Lions by 33.2
- Replay with same day's form
- Bears 0% · Lions 100% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 2 2025 games ·
Bears ·
Lions
More from Week 2 2025
- Commanders at Packers GB 27–18 · replay 92% for the winner
- Bills at Jets BUF 30–10 · replay 98% for the winner
- Browns at Ravens BAL 41–17 · replay 86% for the winner
- Jaguars at Bengals CIN 31–27 · replay 69% for the winner
- Rams at Titans LA 33–19 · replay 96% for the winner
- Patriots at Dolphins NE 33–27 · replay 28% for the winner
- Giants at Cowboys DAL 40–37 · replay 16% for the winner
- Seahawks at Steelers SEA 31–17 · replay 87% for the winner
- 49ers at Saints SF 26–21 · replay 77% for the winner
- Panthers at Cardinals ARI 27–22 · replay 87% for the winner
- Broncos at Colts IND 29–28 · replay 67% for the winner
- Eagles at Chiefs PHI 20–17 · replay 10% for the winner
- Falcons at Vikings ATL 22–6 · replay 87% for the winner
- Buccaneers at Texans TB 20–19 · replay 77% for the winner
- Chargers at Raiders LAC 20–9 · replay 75% for the winner