Week 1 2026 · September 10, 2026
49ers vs Rams, Week 1 2026: who deserved to win?
The 49ers beat the Rams 27–7, and it was no fluke: replayed with the way both teams actually played, the 49ers win 9 of 10. The Rams had the bounces: drops alone were worth 2.2 points to the Rams.
An off day for the Rams: their offense and defense both played far below their usual level. In a fresh game against the 49ers they would win 53% of the time; with this day’s form, 11%. The numbers
Before kickoff the Rams were 60% favorites. The biggest swing (Q3, 4:26 left): the Rams were stopped on 3rd & 2, worth 8 points of win probability to the 49ers.
Final
| 27 | |
| 7 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +11 49ers about even · −11 Rams
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. 49ers win 9, Rams win 1.
- 1 SF 38 LA 7
- 2 SF 41 LA 17
- 3 SF 34 LA 14
- 4 SF 27 LA 10
- 5 SF 23 LA 10
- 6 SF 26 LA 16
- 7 SF 20 LA 13
- 8 SF 24 LA 20
- 9 SF 15 LA 13
- 10 SF 13 LA 20
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
An off day for the Rams
Their offense and defense both played far below their usual level. In a fresh game against the 49ers they would win 53% of the time; with this day’s form, 11%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
41 points apart for the Rams: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| 49ers offenseEPA per play gained | +0.35 | +0.15 | better by 0.20 |
| 49ers defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.00 | +0.12 | better by 0.12 |
| Rams offenseEPA per play gained | +0.00 | +0.19 | worse by 0.19 |
| Rams defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.35 | +0.09 | worse by 0.26 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
49ers win 89% of them, Rams 11%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: 49ers by 20.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| 49ers by 17+ | 47.1% |
| 49ers by 9–16 | 23.2% |
| 49ers by 1–8 | 18.2% |
| Level after regulation | 2.1% |
| Rams by 1–8 | 6.8% |
| Rams by 9–16 | 2.1% |
| Rams by 17+ | 0.6% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was 49ers by 20. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes 49ers by 22.2.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- E. Pineiro, 20 yds made · 100% expected
- E. Pineiro, 56 yds made · 71% expected
- E. Pineiro, 52 yds missed · 77% expected
When it happened
Rams’ chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 74%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 6:17 | E. Pineiro made 20-yard field goalKicks · 100% expected for him | +6% LA | SF: Punt |
| 2 | Q2 8:58 | The Rams were stopped on 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 25% expectedThe Rams threw an interception-worthy pass, and it was pickedInterceptions · 47% expected to stay out of the defense's hands | +8% SF | LA: Punt |
| 3 | Q2 6:55 | The 49ers converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 35% expected | +7% SF | SF: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q2 3:10 | Offensive Holding on the Rams, 10 yardsJudgment calls | +8% SF | SF: Punt |
| 5 | Q2 0:32 | The 49ers were stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 55% expectedM. Evans dropped a catchable passDrops · 17 drops on 328 catchable balls before this | +7% LA | SF: Punt |
| 6 | Q3 11:03 | The Rams fumbled and recovered it themselvesFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +7% LA | LA: Turnover on downs |
| 7 | Q3 4:26 | The Rams were stopped on 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 49% expected | +8% SF | LA: Turnover on downs |
| 8 | Q3 3:46 | The Rams were stopped on 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 63% expected | +6% SF | LA: Turnover |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Ricky Pearsall (SF WR), out (IR) · 0.6 pts
- Sam Okuayinonu (SF DL), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
- Tatum Bethune (SF LB), out · 0.2 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
49ers 100% · Rams 0%
- Final margin
- 49ers by 20
- Luck in points
- 2.2 for the Rams
- Luck-adjusted margin
- 49ers by 22.2
- Replay with same day's form
- 49ers 89% · Rams 11% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 1 2026 games ·
49ers ·
Rams
More from Week 1 2026
- Patriots at Seahawks SEA 13–10 · replay 77% for the winner
- Falcons at Steelers PIT 20–13 · replay 74% for the winner
- Ravens at Colts BAL 41–23 · replay 86% for the winner
- Bills at Texans BUF 36–31 · replay 93% for the winner
- Bears at Panthers CHI 59–37 · replay 76% for the winner
- Browns at Jaguars JAX 34–10 · replay 98% for the winner
- Saints at Lions DET 31–30 · replay 41% for the winner
- Jets at Titans NYJ 23–10 · replay 81% for the winner
- Buccaneers at Bengals CIN 33–27 · replay 96% for the winner
- Cardinals at Chargers ARI 26–14 · replay 49% for the winner
- Packers at Vikings MIN 39–22 · replay 45% for the winner
- Dolphins at Raiders LV 27–13 · replay 45% for the winner
- Commanders at Eagles PHI 24–22 · replay 41% for the winner
- Cowboys at Giants NYG 28–20 · replay 15% for the winner
- Broncos at Chiefs KC 31–10 · replay 86% for the winner