Week 4 2022 · October 2, 2022
Bears at Giants, Week 4 2022: who deserved to win?
The Giants beat the Bears 20–12, and it was no fluke: replayed with the way both teams actually played, the Giants win 9 of 10. The Bears had the bounces: kicks alone were worth 3.3 points to the Bears.
Before kickoff the Giants were 59% favorites. The biggest swing (Q1, 1:33 left): M. Badgley made 22-yard field goal, worth 20 points of win probability to the Giants.
Final
| 12 | |
| 20 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +12 Giants about even · −12 Bears
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Bears win 1, Giants win 9.
- 1 CHI 16 NYG 10
- 2 CHI 14 NYG 16
- 3 CHI 7 NYG 12
- 4 CHI 28 NYG 36
- 5 CHI 7 NYG 19
- 6 CHI 6 NYG 20
- 7 CHI 10 NYG 28
- 8 CHI 17 NYG 38
- 9 CHI 6 NYG 30
- 10 CHI 3 NYG 36
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Bears win 12% of them, Giants 88%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Giants by 8.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Bears by 17+ | 1.1% |
| Bears by 9–16 | 2.5% |
| Bears by 1–8 | 7.1% |
| Level after regulation | 1.5% |
| Giants by 1–8 | 17.6% |
| Giants by 9–16 | 23.5% |
| Giants by 17+ | 46.8% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Giants by 8. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Giants by 8.4.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- M. Badgley, 29 yds made · 95% expected
- M. Badgley, 22 yds made · 97% expected
- M. Badgley, 40 yds made · 85% expected
- M. Badgley, 35 yds made · 91% expected
- G. Gano, 44 yds made · 82% expected
- G. Gano, 43 yds made · 84% expected
- G. Gano, 37 yds missed · 92% expected
When it happened
Giants’ chance of winning
As low as 38% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 1:33 | M. Badgley made 22-yard field goalKicks · 97% expected for him | +20% NYG | CHI: Turnover |
| 2 | Q2 10:22 | The Bears converted 3rd & 203rd & 4th downs · 15% expected | +13% CHI | CHI: Turnover |
| 3 | Q2 9:38 | The Bears fumbled and the Giants recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +10% NYG | CHI: Punt |
| 4 | Q2 7:14 | Illegal Formation on the Giants, 5 yards, wiping out the playPre-snap flags | +9% CHI | CHI: Punt |
| 5 | Q2 6:45 | The Giants converted 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 28% expected | +7% NYG | NYG: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q2 1:49 | M. Badgley made 40-yard field goalKicks · 85% expected for him | +8% CHI | CHI: End of half |
| 7 | Q3 13:06 | The Bears converted 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 27% expected | +9% CHI | CHI: Field goal |
| 8 | Q3 0:50 | The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 43% expectedD. Pettis dropped a catchable passDrops · 0 drops on 2 catchable balls before this | +9% NYG | CHI: Punt |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Leonard Williams (NYG DT), out · 0.6 pts
- Sterling Shepard (NYG WR), out (IR) · 0.5 pts
- Matt Peart (NYG T), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
- Jaylon Johnson (CHI CB), out · 0.9 pts
- David Montgomery (CHI RB), out · 0.4 pts
- Cairo Santos (CHI K), out · 0.3 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Bears 11% · Giants 89%
- Final margin
- Giants by 8
- Luck in points
- 0.4 for the Bears
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Giants by 8.4
- Replay with same day's form
- Bears 12% · Giants 88% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 4 2022 games ·
Bears ·
Giants
More from Week 4 2022
- Dolphins at Bengals CIN 27–15 · replay 68% for the winner
- Vikings vs Saints MIN 28–25 · replay 87% for the winner
- Bills at Ravens BUF 23–20 · replay 61% for the winner
- Browns at Falcons ATL 23–20 · replay 53% for the winner
- Jaguars at Eagles PHI 29–21 · replay 97% for the winner
- Chargers at Texans LAC 34–24 · replay 88% for the winner
- Jets at Steelers NYJ 24–20 · replay 56% for the winner
- Seahawks at Lions SEA 48–45 · replay 87% for the winner
- Titans at Colts TEN 24–17 · replay 79% for the winner
- Commanders at Cowboys DAL 25–10 · replay 84% for the winner
- Cardinals at Panthers ARI 26–16 · replay 96% for the winner
- Broncos at Raiders LV 32–23 · replay 90% for the winner
- Patriots at Packers GB 27–24 · replay 62% for the winner
- Chiefs at Buccaneers KC 41–31 · replay 44% for the winner
- Rams at 49ers SF 24–9 · replay 83% for the winner