Week 3 2024 · September 22, 2024
Bears at Colts, Week 3 2024: who deserved to win?
The Colts beat the Bears 21–16 and were the better team on the day: replayed with the same form, they win 7 of 10. The Bears had the bounces: judgment calls alone were worth 5.2 points to the Bears.
Before kickoff the Colts were 54% favorites. The biggest swing (Q2, 11:07 left): the Colts were stopped on 3rd & 3, worth 17 points of win probability to the Bears.
Final
| 16 | |
| 21 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +30 Colts lucky · −30 Bears
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Bears win 3, Colts win 7.
- 1 CHI 41 IND 21
- 2 CHI 30 IND 20
- 3 CHI 16 IND 13
- 4 CHI 19 IND 20
- 5 CHI 24 IND 27
- 6 CHI 10 IND 17
- 7 CHI 21 IND 31
- 8 CHI 20 IND 34
- 9 CHI 10 IND 28
- 10 CHI 7 IND 34
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Bears win 30% of them, Colts 70%, counting the 4% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Colts by 5.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Bears by 17+ | 4.3% |
| Bears by 9–16 | 8.6% |
| Bears by 1–8 | 15.1% |
| Level after regulation | 3.7% |
| Colts by 1–8 | 24.8% |
| Colts by 9–16 | 19.9% |
| Colts by 17+ | 23.5% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Colts by 5. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Colts by 14.6.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- C. Santos, 56 yds missed · 67% expected
- C. Santos, 53 yds made · 71% expected
When it happened
Colts’ chance of winning
As low as 46% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 9:38 | C. Santos missed 56-yard field goalKicks · 67% expected for him, 31 of 42 from 45+ before | +9% IND | CHI: Punt |
| 2 | Q2 13:02 | The Colts converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 26% expected | +13% IND | IND: Turnover |
| 3 | Q2 11:07 | The Colts were stopped on 3rd & 33rd & 4th downs · 42% expectedThe Colts threw an interception-worthy pass, and it was pickedInterceptions · 48% expected to stay out of the defense's hands | +17% CHI | IND: Touchdown |
| 4 | Q2 9:41 | The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 43rd & 4th downs · 43% expectedThe Bears threw an interception-worthy pass, and it was pickedInterceptions · 49% expected to stay out of the defense's hands | +17% IND | CHI: Turnover on downs |
| 5 | Q2 1:46 | The Bears were stopped on 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 64% expected | +10% IND | CHI: End of half |
| 6 | Q2 0:31 | Offensive Holding on the Bears, 10 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +8% IND | IND: Turnover |
| 7 | Q3 10:05 | Roughing the Kicker on the Colts, 15 yards, wiping out the playJudgment calls | +8% CHI | CHI: Turnover |
| 8 | Q3 7:30 | The Colts were stopped on 4th & 33rd & 4th downs · 49% expected | +9% CHI | IND: Touchdown |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- DeForest Buckner (IND DT), out (IR) · 0.6 pts
- Blake Freeland (IND T), out · 0.5 pts
- Samson Ebukam (IND DE), out (IR) · 0.4 pts
- Julius Brents (IND CB), out (IR) · 0.4 pts
- Patrick Scales (CHI LS), out (IR) · 0.1 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Bears 3% · Colts 97%
- Final margin
- Colts by 5
- Luck in points
- 9.6 for the Bears
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Colts by 14.6
- Replay with same day's form
- Bears 30% · Colts 70% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 3 2024 games ·
Bears ·
Colts
More from Week 3 2024
- Patriots at Jets NYJ 24–3 · replay 88% for the winner
- Broncos at Buccaneers DEN 26–7 · replay 55% for the winner
- Packers at Titans GB 30–14 · replay 86% for the winner
- Texans at Vikings MIN 34–7 · replay 84% for the winner
- Chargers at Steelers PIT 20–10 · replay 86% for the winner
- Giants at Browns NYG 21–15 · replay 80% for the winner
- Eagles at Saints PHI 15–12 · replay 90% for the winner
- Panthers at Raiders CAR 36–22 · replay 49% for the winner
- Dolphins at Seahawks SEA 24–3 · replay 58% for the winner
- Ravens at Cowboys BAL 28–25 · replay 94% for the winner
- Lions at Cardinals DET 20–13 · replay 75% for the winner
- 49ers at Rams LA 27–24 · replay 30% for the winner
- Chiefs at Falcons KC 22–17 · replay 81% for the winner
- Jaguars at Bills BUF 47–10 · replay 99% for the winner
- Commanders at Bengals WAS 38–33 · replay 18% for the winner