Week 5 2024 · October 6, 2024
Packers at Rams, Week 5 2024: who deserved to win?
The Packers beat the Rams 24–19 and were the better team on the day: replayed with the same form, they win 7 of 10. The Rams had the bounces: drops alone were worth 2.9 points to the Rams.
Before kickoff the Packers were 59% favorites. The biggest swing (Q2, 2:12 left): the Packers were stopped on 3rd & 12, worth 28 points of win probability to the Rams.
Final
| 24 | |
| 19 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +33 Packers lucky · −33 Rams
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Packers win 7, Rams win 3.
- 1 GB 37 LA 13
- 2 GB 30 LA 12
- 3 GB 17 LA 3
- 4 GB 27 LA 16
- 5 GB 42 LA 34
- 6 GB 17 LA 13
- 7 GB 28 LA 26
- 8 GB 10 LA 13
- 9 GB 23 LA 30
- 10 GB 20 LA 38
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Packers win 67% of them, Rams 33%, counting the 2% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Packers by 5.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Packers by 17+ | 18.2% |
| Packers by 9–16 | 21.3% |
| Packers by 1–8 | 26.2% |
| Level after regulation | 2.4% |
| Rams by 1–8 | 18.6% |
| Rams by 9–16 | 9.2% |
| Rams by 17+ | 4.2% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Packers by 5. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Packers by 3.4.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- B. Narveson, 46 yds made · 79% expected
- Extra point missed · 95% expected
When it happened
Rams’ chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 77%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q2 14:26 | The Rams converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 72% expected | +9% LA | LA: Touchdown |
| 2 | Q2 9:51 | The Rams converted 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 66% expected | +9% LA | LA: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q2 3:49 | The Rams were stopped on 3rd & 163rd & 4th downs · 20% expected | +8% GB | LA: Punt |
| 4 | Q2 2:12 | The Packers were stopped on 3rd & 123rd & 4th downs · 27% expectedThe Packers threw an interception-worthy pass, and it was pickedInterceptions · 49% expected to stay out of the defense's handsReturn touchdown by the RamsSpecial teams | +28% LA | GB: Field goal |
| 5 | Q2 0:02 | B. Narveson made 46-yard field goalKicks · 79% expected for him, 2 of 4 from 45+ before | +7% GB | GB: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q3 8:15 | The Rams were stopped on 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 27% expectedThe Rams threw an interception-worthy pass, and it was pickedInterceptions · 48% expected to stay out of the defense's hands | +11% GB | LA: Punt |
| 7 | Q4 1:57 | The Rams converted 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 73% expected | +11% LA | LA: Turnover on downs |
| 8 | Q4 1:05 | The Rams were stopped on 4th & 53rd & 4th downs · 40% expected | +19% GB | – |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Puka Nacua (LA WR), out (IR) · 1.5 pts
- Cooper Kupp (LA WR), out · 1.3 pts
- Tre'Davious White (LA CB), out · 1.3 pts
- Tyler Higbee (LA TE), out (IR) · 0.7 pts
- John Johnson (LA SS), out (IR) · 0.5 pts
- Steve Avila (LA G), out (IR) · 0.4 pts
- Jaire Alexander (GB CB), out · 0.9 pts
- Romeo Doubs (GB WR), out (IR) · 0.7 pts
- Christian Watson (GB WR), out · 0.5 pts
- Devonte Wyatt (GB DE), out · 0.2 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Packers 91% · Rams 9%
- Final margin
- Packers by 5
- Luck in points
- 1.6 for the Packers
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Packers by 3.4
- Replay with same day's form
- Packers 67% · Rams 33% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 5 2024 games ·
Packers ·
Rams
More from Week 5 2024
- Buccaneers at Falcons ATL 36–30 · replay 69% for the winner
- Jets vs Vikings MIN 23–17 · replay 90% for the winner
- Ravens at Bengals BAL 41–38 · replay 51% for the winner
- Bills at Texans HOU 23–20 · replay 83% for the winner
- Panthers at Bears CHI 36–10 · replay 96% for the winner
- Browns at Commanders WAS 34–13 · replay 99% for the winner
- Colts at Jaguars JAX 37–34 · replay 26% for the winner
- Dolphins at Patriots MIA 15–10 · replay 32% for the winner
- Cardinals at 49ers ARI 24–23 · replay 58% for the winner
- Raiders at Broncos DEN 34–18 · replay 30% for the winner
- Giants at Seahawks NYG 29–20 · replay 19% for the winner
- Cowboys at Steelers DAL 20–17 · replay 84% for the winner
- Saints at Chiefs KC 26–13 · replay 71% for the winner