luckadjusted

Week 9 2024 · November 3, 2024

Bears at Cardinals, Week 9 2024: who deserved to win?

The Cardinals beat the Bears 29–9, and it was no fluke: replayed with the way both teams actually played, the Cardinals win 9 of 10. The Bears had the bounces: fumble bounces alone were worth 3.1 points to the Bears.

Before kickoff the Cardinals were 54% favorites. The biggest swing (Q2, 0:12 left): the Cardinals converted 3rd & 5, worth 13 points of win probability to the Cardinals.

Final

Chicago Bears 9
Arizona Cardinals 29

November 3, 2024 · State Farm Stadium · Closing line: Cardinals −1.5

Luck index +10 Cardinals about even · −10 Bears

Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works

Ten replays. Bears win 1, Cardinals win 9.

  1. 1 CHI 23 ARI 17
  2. 2 CHI 19 ARI 21
  3. 3 CHI 22 ARI 28
  4. 4 CHI 23 ARI 31
  5. 5 CHI 9 ARI 21
  6. 6 CHI 17 ARI 31
  7. 7 CHI 6 ARI 24
  8. 8 CHI 9 ARI 31
  9. 9 CHI 3 ARI 29
  10. 10 CHI 3 ARI 36

Three other ways to ask

Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.

The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.

The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.

Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.

How 4,000 replays ended

Bears win 10% of them, Cardinals 90%, counting the 1% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Cardinals by 20.

Show as a table
Final margin in the replaysShare of replays
Bears by 17+0.5%
Bears by 9–162.2%
Bears by 1–87.0%
Level after regulation1.3%
Cardinals by 1–819.4%
Cardinals by 9–1621.7%
Cardinals by 17+47.9%

Where the luck was

Take the luck out

The final margin was Cardinals by 20. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Cardinals by 20.6.

Each row takes one kind of luck out of the margin. Color shows which team it helped. Luck shares are the fitted ones (how much of each component is luck).

The kicks

How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.

  • C. Santos, 29 yds made · 98% expected
  • C. Santos, 53 yds made · 71% expected
  • C. Santos, 53 yds made · 71% expected
  • C. Ryland, 29 yds made · 96% expected
  • C. Ryland, 55 yds made · 62% expected
Bar: expected chance of a make. Filled dot: made. Open dot: missed or blocked.

When it happened

Cardinals’ chance of winning

As low as 42% and as high as 100%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.

nflfastR’s in-game win probability. It ignores the betting line, so it starts near even. Shaded above the middle while the Cardinals were ahead in it, below while the Bears were.
#WhenWhat happenedWin probability forNext drive
1 Q1 10:22 The Bears converted 3rd & 23rd & 4th downs · 60% expected +7% CHI CHI: Punt
2 Q1 8:22 Illegal Formation on the Bears, 5 yards, wiping out the playPre-snap flags +8% ARI ARI: Punt
3 Q2 13:53 The Bears converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 34% expected +10% CHI CHI: Field goal
4 Q2 4:25 The Cardinals were stopped on 3rd & 63rd & 4th downs · 29% expected +8% CHI ARI: Touchdown
5 Q2 3:40 Leverage on the Bears (Gervon Dexter), 7 yardsJudgment calls · 1 flag in 840 snaps before, position avg 1 per 316 +10% ARI ARI: Touchdown
6 Q2 0:35 The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 31% expectedK. Allen dropped a catchable passDrops · 6 drops on 211 catchable balls before this +7% ARI CHI: Field goal
7 Q2 0:30 C. Santos made 53-yard field goalKicks · 71% expected for him, 33 of 45 from 45+ before +8% CHI CHI: End of half
8 Q2 0:12 The Cardinals converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 41% expected +13% ARI ARI: Touchdown

Missing players

Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.

  • Sean Murphy-Bunting (ARI CB), out · 0.8 pts
  • Will Hernandez (ARI G), out (IR) · 0.4 pts
  • Justin Jones (ARI DT), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
  • Matt Prater (ARI K), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
  • Montez Sweat (CHI DE), out · 0.8 pts
  • Braxton Jones (CHI T), out · 0.7 pts
  • Kyler Gordon (CHI CB), out · 0.5 pts
  • Jaquan Brisker (CHI SS), out · 0.4 pts

Adjust the assumptions

Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.

Only coin-flips re-rolled

Bears 0% · Cardinals 100%

Final margin
Cardinals by 20
Luck in points
0.6 for the Bears
Luck-adjusted margin
Cardinals by 20.6
Replay with same day's form
Bears 10% · Cardinals 90% unchanged: why
How much of each is luck?

0% treats it as skill, 100% as pure luck. The tick is our fit.

What counts

We tested momentum on 19,000 lucky breaks and found none, so it's off by default. Why

Flip a play

Force the other outcome, in this game and in every replay: a made kick becomes a miss, a stop becomes a conversion, a flag goes the other way.

About these numbers

Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.

Methodology and validation · All Week 9 2024 games · Bears · Cardinals

More from Week 9 2024