Week 2 2026 · September 20, 2026
Raiders at Chargers, Week 2 2026: who deserved to win?
The Raiders beat the Chargers 26–14 and were the better team on the day: replayed with the same form, they win 7 of 10. The Chargers had the bounces: drops alone were worth 2.6 points to the Chargers.
An off day for the Chargers: they played far below what the matchup promised. In a fresh game against the Raiders they would win 62% of the time; with this day’s form, 31%. The numbers
Before kickoff the Chargers were 68% favorites. The biggest swing (Q1, 3:26 left): the Chargers were stopped on 3rd & 5, worth 25 points of win probability to the Raiders.
Final
| 26 | |
| 14 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +31 Raiders lucky · −31 Chargers
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Raiders win 7, Chargers win 3.
- 1 LV 31 LAC 8
- 2 LV 34 LAC 17
- 3 LV 23 LAC 10
- 4 LV 33 LAC 23
- 5 LV 13 LAC 6
- 6 LV 24 LAC 19
- 7 LV 24 LAC 22
- 8 LV 17 LAC 20
- 9 LV 16 LAC 24
- 10 LV 9 LAC 26
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
An off day for the Chargers
They played far below what the matchup promised. In a fresh game against the Raiders they would win 62% of the time; with this day’s form, 31%.
Same teams, fresh game
Replay with same day's form
31 points apart for the Chargers: the gap is how differently this game went from what the two teams usually are.
| Unit | This game | Usual level | Better or worse than usual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raiders offenseEPA per play gained | +0.03 | +0.01 | better by 0.03 |
| Raiders defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.00 | +0.09 | better by 0.08 |
| Chargers offenseEPA per play gained | +0.00 | +0.07 | worse by 0.07 |
| Chargers defenseEPA per play allowed | +0.03 | +0.06 | better by 0.03 |
EPA (expected points added) per play on competitive snaps, turnovers left out because they are valued as luck. Usual level: the team’s earlier games this season plus half of last season, pulled toward the league average. One team’s defense and the other team’s offense are the same snaps, so one game can’t fully say whose day it was; it shows how far this one was from both teams’ norms.
How 4,000 replays ended
Raiders win 69% of them, Chargers 31%, counting the 3% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Raiders by 12.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Raiders by 17+ | 22.2% |
| Raiders by 9–16 | 20.8% |
| Raiders by 1–8 | 24.7% |
| Level after regulation | 3.3% |
| Chargers by 1–8 | 16.2% |
| Chargers by 9–16 | 8.4% |
| Chargers by 17+ | 4.4% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Raiders by 12. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Raiders by 9.3.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- C. Dicker, 58 yds missed · 69% expected
- M. Gay, 59 yds made · 59% expected
When it happened
Chargers’ chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 72%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 3:26 | The Chargers were stopped on 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 40% expectedThe Chargers were intercepted on a well-placed throwInterceptions · 0% expected to stay out of the defense's hands | +24% LV | LAC: Punt |
| 2 | Q1 0:40 | The Raiders were stopped on 4th & 13rd & 4th downs · 63% expected | +10% LAC | LV: Touchdown |
| 3 | Q2 14:01 | The Chargers were stopped on 3rd & 93rd & 4th downs · 28% expected | +10% LV | LAC: Punt |
| 4 | Q3 11:14 | The Chargers converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 40% expected | +18% LAC | LAC: Touchdown |
| 5 | Q3 3:59 | The Raiders converted 3rd & 103rd & 4th downs · 24% expected | +12% LV | LV: Touchdown |
| 6 | Q4 6:59 | The Raiders were stopped on 3rd & 13rd & 4th downs · 71% expectedA. Jeanty dropped a catchable passDrops · 5 drops on 73 catchable balls before this | +13% LAC | LV: Punt |
| 7 | Q4 4:49 | The Chargers were stopped on 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 33% expectedThe Chargers fumbled and recovered it themselvesFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +11% LAC | LAC: Turnover |
| 8 | Q4 3:03 | The Raiders converted 3rd & 53rd & 4th downs · 38% expected | +11% LV | LV: Touchdown |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Trey Pipkins (LAC G), out · 0.4 pts
- Elijah Molden (LAC DB), out · 0.3 pts
- Denzel Perryman (LAC LB), out (IR) · 0.2 pts
- Brock Bowers (LV TE), out · 1.2 pts
- Darien Porter (LV CB), out · 0.4 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Raiders 89% · Chargers 11%
- Final margin
- Raiders by 12
- Luck in points
- 2.7 for the Raiders
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Raiders by 9.3
- Replay with same day's form
- Raiders 69% · Chargers 31% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 2 2026 games ·
Raiders ·
Chargers
More from Week 2 2026
- Lions at Bills BUF 41–31 · replay 94% for the winner
- Panthers at Falcons CAR 34–3 · replay 87% for the winner
- Bengals at Texans CIN 20–6 · replay 44% for the winner
- Browns at Buccaneers CLE 23–19 · replay 43% for the winner
- Packers at Jets GB 20–17 · replay 34% for the winner
- Vikings at Bears MIN 9–3 · replay 55% for the winner
- Saints at Ravens NO 24–17 · replay 13% for the winner
- Eagles at Titans PHI 24–20 · replay 74% for the winner
- Steelers at Patriots NE 20–3 · replay 90% for the winner
- Jaguars at Broncos DEN 20–13 · replay 60% for the winner
- Dolphins at 49ers SF 35–13 · replay 99% for the winner
- Seahawks at Cardinals SEA 31–7 · replay 70% for the winner
- Commanders at Cowboys DAL 37–20 · replay 79% for the winner
- Colts at Chiefs KC 33–30 · replay 53% for the winner
- Giants at Rams LA 28–6 · replay 94% for the winner