Week 2 2026 · September 20, 2026
Vikings at Bears, Week 2 2026: who deserved to win?
The Vikings beat the Bears 9–3, but it was a coin flip: replayed with the way both teams played, the Vikings win 5 of 10. Luck ran their way: kicks alone were worth 4.2 points to the Vikings.
Before kickoff the Bears were 63% favorites. The biggest swing (Q4, 6:26 left): C. Santos had a 23-yard field goal blocked, worth 25 points of win probability to the Vikings.
Final
| 9 | |
| 3 |
Replay with same day's form
Luck index +45 Vikings lucky · −45 Bears
Each team’s own plays from this game, resampled into new drives 4,000 times: with the way both teams actually played, how often does this performance win? How the replay works
Ten replays. Vikings win 5, Bears win 5.
- 1 MIN 32 CHI 13
- 2 MIN 21 CHI 9
- 3 MIN 15 CHI 7
- 4 MIN 21 CHI 17
- 5 MIN 10 CHI 8
- 6 MIN 17 CHI 19
- 7 MIN 7 CHI 12
- 8 MIN 10 CHI 19
- 9 MIN 7 CHI 20
- 10 MIN 3 CHI 21
Three other ways to ask
Each answers a different question, so none of them replaces the replay above.
Before kickoff
The closing betting line, turned into a probability. What everyone knew before the game.
Same teams, fresh game
The line plus what this game showed, weighted by how much one game can tell. It stays close to the line because one game says little.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Every kick, fumble bounce, drop, conversion and judgment call redrawn; everything else fixed. The narrowest view of luck.
How 4,000 replays ended
Vikings win 55% of them, Bears 45%, counting the 7% still level after regulation as half each. The line is what actually happened: Vikings by 6.
Show as a table
| Final margin in the replays | Share of replays |
|---|---|
| Vikings by 17+ | 8.2% |
| Vikings by 9–16 | 16.2% |
| Vikings by 1–8 | 24.7% |
| Level after regulation | 6.9% |
| Bears by 1–8 | 22.6% |
| Bears by 9–16 | 14.3% |
| Bears by 17+ | 7.2% |
Where the luck was
Take the luck out
The final margin was Vikings by 6. Remove the luck, one kind at a time, and it becomes Bears by 5.9.
The kicks
How likely each kicker was to make that kick (his own record, the distance and the weather), and what happened.
- W. Reichard, 35 yds made · 93% expected
- C. Santos, 50 yds made · 72% expected
- W. Reichard, 49 yds made · 76% expected
- C. Santos, 23 yds blocked · 100% expected
- W. Reichard, 39 yds made · 89% expected
When it happened
Bears’ chance of winning
As low as 0% and as high as 66%. Numbers mark the biggest luck moments, listed below.
| # | When | What happened | Win probability for | Next drive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q1 1:47 | The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 123rd & 4th downs · 23% expectedThe Bears threw an interception-worthy pass, and it was pickedInterceptions · 49% expected to stay out of the defense's handsDelay of Game on the Bears, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +8% MIN | CHI: Punt |
| 2 | Q2 2:00 | The Bears were stopped on 3rd & 293rd & 4th downs · 12% expectedFalse Start on the Bears, 5 yardsPre-snap flags | +8% MIN | CHI: Punt |
| 3 | Q3 10:19 | The Bears converted 3rd & 83rd & 4th downs · 23% expected | +8% CHI | CHI: Turnover |
| 4 | Q3 9:42 | The Bears fumbled and the Vikings recoveredFumble bounces · loose balls are close to 50/50 | +10% MIN | CHI: Punt |
| 5 | Q4 11:42 | The Bears converted 3rd & 73rd & 4th downs · 33% expected | +15% CHI | CHI: Missed field goal |
| 6 | Q4 6:26 | C. Santos had a 23-yard field goal blockedKicks · 100% expected for him | +25% MIN | CHI: Turnover on downs |
| 7 | Q4 0:10 | The Bears got away with an interception-worthy throwInterceptions · 49% expected to stay out of the defense's hands | +10% CHI | CHI: Turnover on downs |
| 8 | Q4 0:01 | The Bears were stopped on 4th & 23rd & 4th downs · 58% expected | +22% MIN | – |
Missing players
Key players (usually on the field for half the snaps or more) who missed this game or part of it, valued by position and quality. The same players are missing in every replay, so this counts as luck in points only.
- Ozzy Trapilo (CHI OL), out · 0.3 pts
- Kyler Gordon (CHI DB), out (IR) · 0.3 pts
Adjust the assumptions
Disagree with how much of a fumble bounce or a pass interference call is luck? Change it and the coin-flip replay reruns in your browser.
Only coin-flips re-rolled
Vikings 19% · Bears 81%
- Final margin
- Vikings by 6
- Luck in points
- 11.9 for the Vikings
- Luck-adjusted margin
- Bears by 5.9
- Replay with same day's form
- Vikings 55% · Bears 45% unchanged: why
About these numbers
Play-by-play and win probability from nflfastR via nflverse; kicks valued against each kicker’s own record; drops and interception-worthy throws from FTN charting; injuries from snap counts and injury reports.
Methodology and validation · All Week 2 2026 games ·
Vikings ·
Bears
More from Week 2 2026
- Lions at Bills BUF 41–31 · replay 94% for the winner
- Panthers at Falcons CAR 34–3 · replay 87% for the winner
- Bengals at Texans CIN 20–6 · replay 44% for the winner
- Browns at Buccaneers CLE 23–19 · replay 43% for the winner
- Packers at Jets GB 20–17 · replay 34% for the winner
- Saints at Ravens NO 24–17 · replay 13% for the winner
- Eagles at Titans PHI 24–20 · replay 74% for the winner
- Steelers at Patriots NE 20–3 · replay 90% for the winner
- Jaguars at Broncos DEN 20–13 · replay 60% for the winner
- Raiders at Chargers LV 26–14 · replay 69% for the winner
- Dolphins at 49ers SF 35–13 · replay 99% for the winner
- Seahawks at Cardinals SEA 31–7 · replay 70% for the winner
- Commanders at Cowboys DAL 37–20 · replay 79% for the winner
- Colts at Chiefs KC 33–30 · replay 53% for the winner
- Giants at Rams LA 28–6 · replay 94% for the winner